| Literature DB >> 32787833 |
Mohammad Mahdi Taghipour1, Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing demand for medical services has increased patient waiting time due to the limited number or unbalanced distribution of healthcare centers. Healthcare teleconsultation networks are one of the potentially powerful systems to overcome this problem. Medical pathology can hugely benefit from teleconsultation networks because having second opinions is precious for many cases; however, resource planning (i.e., assignment and distribution of pathology consultation requests) is challenging due to bulky medical images of patients. This results in high setup and operational costs. The aim of this study is to design an optimal teleconsultation network for pathology labs under the supervision of medical sciences universities in Tehran, Iran.Entities:
Keywords: Cost management; Healthcare networks; Mathematical modeling; Medical teleconsultation; Resource optimization; Telepathology
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32787833 PMCID: PMC7477836 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01170-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ISSN: 1472-6947 Impact factor: 2.796
| The cost of request transmission from nodes | |
| The consultation fee of node | |
| The maximum number of consultation requests of type | |
| The minimum number of consultation requests of type | |
| The number of consultation requests of type | |
| The maximum capacity of the link between node | |
| The number of consultations needed per request for the requests of type |
Underlying network topology classes
| Na | Avg Degb | α | β | ε | N | Avg Deg | α | β | ε | N | Avg Deg | α | β | ε |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 4 | 0.65 | 0.15 | 3.12 | 200 | 4 | 0.63 | 0.13 | 3.04 | 300 | 4 | 0.61 | 0.11 | 3.00 |
| 8 | 0.94 | 0.15 | 3.12 | 8 | 0.93 | 0.13 | 3.04 | 8 | 0.91 | 0.11 | 3.00 | |||
| 12 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 3.26 | 12 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 3.32 | 12 | 0.98 | 0.15 | 3.40 | |||
| 16 | 1.12 | 0.17 | 3.12 | 16 | 1.12 | 0.17 | 3.08 | 16 | 1.15 | 0.18 | 3.00 | |||
| 100 | 4 | 0.64 | 0.13 | 3.09 | 250 | 4 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 3.02 | 325 | 4 | 0.60 | 0.11 | 3.00 |
| 8 | 0.94 | 0.13 | 3.09 | 8 | 0.92 | 0.12 | 3.02 | 8 | 0.90 | 0.11 | 3.00 | |||
| 12 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 3.26 | 12 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 3.32 | 12 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 3.45 | |||
| 16 | 1.12 | 0.17 | 3.09 | 16 | 1.15 | 0.17 | 3.40 | 16 | 1.15 | 0.18 | 3.00 | |||
| 150 | 4 | 0.64 | 0.13 | 3.07 | 275 | 4 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 3.01 | 350 | 4 | 0.60 | 0.10 | 3.00 |
| 8 | 0.93 | 0.13 | 3.07 | 8 | 0.92 | 0.12 | 3.01 | 8 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 3.00 | |||
| 12 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 3.30 | 12 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 3.40 | 12 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 3.50 | |||
| 16 | 1.12 | 0.17 | 3.07 | 16 | 1.15 | 0.17 | 3.02 | 16 | 1.20 | 0.18 | 3.00 |
aN: Network Nodes, bAvg Deg: Average Node Degree
Intervals for the model parameters in the test problems
| Parameter | Range |
|---|---|
| cij | |
| uij | |
Effect of the number of nodes on the performance of the model
| No. | Network nodes | Computational time (Secs) | Consultation cost | Transmission cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 1.65 | 50,540 | 16,259 |
| 2 | 100 | 7.92 | 103,067 | 31,039 |
| 3 | 150 | 19.69 | 162,251 | 49,545 |
| 4 | 200 | 51.87 | 204,702 | 63,895 |
| 5 | 250 | 91.29 | 247,532 | 83,678 |
| 6 | 275 | 120.21 | 277,292 | 85,492 |
| 7 | 300 | 172.44 | 303,149 | 95,089 |
| 8 | 325 | 241.97 | 335,138 | 104,507 |
| 9 | 350 | 350.01 | 360,547 | 112,430 |
Computational times for different average node degrees
| No. | Network nodes | Computational times for Avg. Deg. of 4 | Computational times for Avg. Deg. of 8 | Computational times for Avg. Deg. of 12 | Computational times for Avg. Deg. of 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 1.65 | 2.42 | 3.23 | 3.96 |
| 2 | 100 | 7.92 | 9.36 | 11.87 | 14.04 |
| 3 | 150 | 19.69 | 23.95 | 27.94 | 30.56 |
| 4 | 200 | 51.87 | 53.76 | 58.09 | 63.45 |
| 5 | 250 | 91.29 | 95.72 | 99.98 | 109.78 |
| 6 | 275 | 120.21 | 132.05 | 135.08 | 148.68 |
| 7 | 300 | 172.44 | 180.34 | 184.16 | 196.01 |
| 8 | 325 | 241.97 | 261.46 | 285.83 | 311.60 |
| 9 | 350 | 350.01 | 374.64 | 409.21 | 443.73 |
| The number of type | |
| The number of type |