Aims: In hypoxic tumor microenvironments, the strongly reducing redox environment reduces evofosfamide (TH-302) to release a cytotoxic bromo-isophosphoramide (Br-IPM) moiety. This drug therefore preferentially attacks hypoxic regions in tumors where other standard anticancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy are often ineffective. Various combination therapies with evofosfamide have been proposed and tested in preclinical and clinical settings. However, the treatment effect of evofosfamide monotherapy on tumor hypoxia has not been fully understood, partly due to the lack of quantitative methods to assess tumor pO2in vivo. Here, we use quantitative pO2 imaging by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to evaluate the change in tumor hypoxia in response to evofosfamide treatment using two pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenograft models: MIA Paca-2 tumors responding to evofosfamide and Su.86.86 tumors that do not respond. Results: EPR imaging showed that oxygenation improved globally after evofosfamide treatment in hypoxic MIA Paca-2 tumors, in agreement with the ex vivo results obtained from hypoxia staining by pimonidazole and in apparent contrast to the decrease in Ktrans observed in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI). Innovations: The observation that evofosfamide not only kills the hypoxic region of the tumor but also improves oxygenation in the residual tumor regions provides a rationale for combination therapies using radiation and antiproliferatives post evofosfamide for improved outcomes. Conclusion: This study suggests that reoxygenation after evofosfamide treatment is due to decreased oxygen demand rather than improved perfusion. Following the change in pO2 after treatment may therefore yield a way of monitoring treatment response. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 35, 904-915.
Aims: In hypoxic tumor microenvironments, the strongly reducing redox environment reduces evofosfamide (TH-302) to release a cytotoxic bromo-isophosphoramide (Br-IPM) moiety. This drug therefore preferentially attacks hypoxic regions in tumors where other standard anticancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy are often ineffective. Various combination therapies with evofosfamide have been proposed and tested in preclinical and clinical settings. However, the treatment effect of evofosfamide monotherapy on tumor hypoxia has not been fully understood, partly due to the lack of quantitative methods to assess tumor pO2in vivo. Here, we use quantitative pO2 imaging by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to evaluate the change in tumor hypoxia in response to evofosfamide treatment using two pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenograft models: MIA Paca-2 tumors responding to evofosfamide and Su.86.86 tumors that do not respond. Results: EPR imaging showed that oxygenation improved globally after evofosfamide treatment in hypoxic MIA Paca-2 tumors, in agreement with the ex vivo results obtained from hypoxia staining by pimonidazole and in apparent contrast to the decrease in Ktrans observed in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI). Innovations: The observation that evofosfamide not only kills the hypoxic region of the tumor but also improves oxygenation in the residual tumor regions provides a rationale for combination therapies using radiation and antiproliferatives post evofosfamide for improved outcomes. Conclusion: This study suggests that reoxygenation after evofosfamide treatment is due to decreased oxygen demand rather than improved perfusion. Following the change in pO2 after treatment may therefore yield a way of monitoring treatment response. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 35, 904-915.
Authors: Ken-ichiro Matsumoto; Marcelino Bernardo; Sankaran Subramanian; Peter Choyke; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna; Martin J Lizak Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark W Dewhirst; Yvonne M Mowery; James B Mitchell; Murali K Cherukuri; Timothy W Secomb Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jingli Wang; Chris P Guise; Gabi U Dachs; Yen Phung; Annie Huai-Ling Hsu; Neil K Lambie; Adam V Patterson; William R Wilson Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: William D Tap; Zsuzsanna Papai; Brian A Van Tine; Steven Attia; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robin L Jones; Scott Schuetze; Damon Reed; Sant P Chawla; Richard F Riedel; Anders Krarup-Hansen; Maud Toulmonde; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Peter Hohenberger; Giovanni Grignani; Lee D Cranmer; Scott Okuno; Mark Agulnik; William Read; Christopher W Ryan; Thierry Alcindor; Xavier F Garcia Del Muro; G Thomas Budd; Hussein Tawbi; Tillman Pearce; Stew Kroll; Denise K Reinke; Patrick Schöffski Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ken-ichiro Matsumoto; Sankaran Subramanian; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Thirumaran Aravalluvan; Ramachandran Murugesan; John A Cook; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sarah G J A Peeters; Catharina M L Zegers; Rianne Biemans; Natasja G Lieuwes; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Ala Yaromina; Jessica D Sun; Charles P Hart; Albert D Windhorst; Wouter van Elmpt; Ludwig J Dubois; Philippe Lambin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hélène Pelicano; Li Feng; Yan Zhou; Jennifer S Carew; Elizabeth O Hileman; William Plunkett; Michael J Keating; Peng Huang Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-07-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Carla Hajj; James Russell; Charles P Hart; Karyn A Goodman; Maeve A Lowery; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Joseph O Deasy; John L Humm Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Bruna V Jardim-Perassi; Wei Mu; Suning Huang; Michal R Tomaszewski; Jan Poleszczuk; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Mikalai M Budzevich; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Damon R Reed; Marilyn M Bui; Joseph O Johnson; Gary V Martinez; Robert J Gillies Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Enrique Grande; Cristina Rodriguez-Antona; Carlos López; Teresa Alonso-Gordoa; Marta Benavent; Jaume Capdevila; Alex Teulé; Ana Custodio; Isabel Sevilla; Jorge Hernando; Pablo Gajate; Javier Molina-Cerrillo; Juan José Díez; María Santos; Javier Lanillos; Rocío García-Carbonero Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-07-14