Cecilia Ciccolini1, Giacomo Mari1, Francesco G Gatti2, Giuseppe Gatti1, Gianluca Giorgi3, Fabio Mantellini1, Gianfranco Favi1. 1. Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Section of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technologies, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Via I Maggetti 24, 61029 Urbino, Italy. 2. Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "G. Natta", Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy. 3. Department of Biotechnologies, Chemistry & Pharmacy, University of Siena, Via A. Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Abstract
Zn(II)-catalyzed divergent synthesis of functionalized polycyclic indolines through formal [3 + 2] and [4 + 2] cycloadditions of indoles with 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) is reported. The nature and type of substituents of substrates are found to act as a chemical switch to trigger two distinct reaction pathways and to obtain two different types of products upon the influence of the same catalyst. The mechanism of both [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadditions was investigated and fully rationalized by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Zn(II)-catalyzed divergent synthesis of functionalized polycyclic indolines through formal [3 + 2] and [4 + 2] cycloadditions of indoles with 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) is reported. The nature and type of substituents of substrates are found to act as a chemical switch to trigger two distinct reaction pathways and to obtain two different types of products upon the influence of the same catalyst. The mechanism of both [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadditions was investigated and fully rationalized by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
Functionalized polycyclic
fused indoline frameworks are central
molecular architectures in nature and pharmaceuticals.[1] As one of the indolines, C2,C3-fused indolines[2] have attracted extensive research effort over
the past decades because scaffolds of this type lead to relatively
rigid structures that might be expected to show substantial selectivity
in their interactions with enzymes or receptors.[3] Representative naturally occurring polycyclic indolines
such as vincorine, minfiensine, gliocladin C, kopsnone, pleiomaltinine,
and communesin F are shown in Figure .
Figure 1
Examples of naturally occurring compounds containing 2,3-fused
indolines.
Examples of naturally occurring compounds containing 2,3-fused
indolines.Among the annelated indolines,
the pyrroloindoline, pyridazino
indoline skeletons and their related structures, can be found in numerous
natural bioactive products, marketed drugs, and other functional molecules.[4,5] The desire to build such appealing polycyclic frameworks, particularly
those with bridgehead amino acetal C2 carbons, has inspired the development
of elegant methodologies over the past several years. Among the reported
methods, dearomatization of indoles via cycloaddition
reactions[6] has been demonstrated as a reliable
approach in converting simple planar aromatic molecules into structurally
complex and stereoselective ring systems.Following the initial
discovery of the inverse electron-demand
[4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of electron-rich alkenes (furans, pyrroles,
and indoles) with 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs) by Gilchrist et al.,[7] other elegant studies by the groups of Wang[8] and Tan[9] have been
recently reported exploiting indoles as nucleophiles.By taking
advantage of the unique reactivity of DDs[10] and intrigued by these and our recent findings
in the manipulation of indolyl cores,[11] we reasoned that the proper combination of indole and 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene
elements might allow us to design a substrate-controlled divergent
approach. In this design, DDs would be used as C2N1 or C2N2 units
(1,3 or 1,4 dipole synthons) to realize [3 + 2] and [4 + 2] annulation
reactions of indoles, respectively (Scheme ). Thus, by tuning the substituents of both
substrates upon the influence of the same catalyst, two series of
fused indoline-based scaffolds such as tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indoles and tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles would be generated with chemodivergence.
Scheme 1
Working
Hypothesis: Chemodivergent Synthesis of Polycyclic Fused
Indoline Scaffolds
Distinct from previous
findings, we herein report our successful
development of a substituent-controlled divergent synthesis of fused
indoline-based scaffolds. These [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadditions
were realized in a straightforward, pretty challenging, and highly
atom-economical/diastereselective manner from rationally designed
indole and 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene substrates with C3 and/or C4 position(s)
substituted, respectively.
Results and Discussion
We began
our work by studying the reaction between indole 1a and
cyclic 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2a (Table S1, Supporting Information (SI)). No reaction
took place, and both compounds remained inactive in the absence of
a Lewis acidcatalyst. A series of Lewis acidcatalysts [such as Sc(OTf)3, Zn(OAc)2, ZnSO4, Zn(OTf)2, SmCl3·6H2O, LiClO4, LiCl,
CuCl2, Cu(OTf)2, CuBr2, InBr3, ZnBr2, and ZnCl2] and solvents [such
as dichloromethane (DCM), acetone, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile,
and cyclohexane] were examined, and the combination of ZnCl2 and CH2Cl2 (heterogeneous catalytic system)
was found to be superior for this transformation. Noteworthy, compound 3a was obtained as a single regio- and diastereoisomer (50%
yield).The substrate scope with respect to various 2,3-unsubstituted
indoles 1a–n and cyclic DDs 2a–h (see the SI for details) was
then examined under the optimized reaction conditions, and a variety
of tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indoles (tetracyclic fused ring (6-5-6-6/7/8) systems) 3a–x was synthesized (Table ). As shown in Table , indoles 1a–n with different electroniccharacters were suitable for the reaction,
with six-membered cyclic DDs giving the relative fused indoline heterocycles 3a–d in moderate to good yields. The Zn-catalyzed
[4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions were further extended to seven- and
eight-membered cyclic DDs. We were glad to find that the use of seven-membered
DDs gave rise to the best results in terms of isolated yields. Also,
the wide functional group tolerance was well demonstrated by the fact
that both electron-donating (5-OMe, 5-, 7-Me) and electron-withdrawing
(6-Cl, 5-CO2Me, 5-CN, 5-CHO, 5-NO2) groups were
well tolerated, providing efficient access to the fused indoline heterocycles 3e–s. Interestingly, the use of the 7-azaindole
substrate also worked well to give the product 3t in
85% isolated yield. The formal [4 + 2] annulation was then extended
to DDs bearing cyclooctane, and the reactions furnished the relative
products 3u–x with lower yields than
those of seven-membered cyclic DDs. Additionally, the generality of
the N-terminal protective group on DDs as well as for the N atom of
indoles was explored. Remarkably, free N–H
indoles were also compatible with this protocol, albeit slightly lower
yields were observed, probably owing to the reduced nucleophilicity
at C3 and the reduced electrophilicity at C2 of the starting indole
(Scheme , 3svs3p, and 3xvs3u).
Table 1
Scope of the Zn(II)-Catalyzed
[4 +
2] Cycloaddition Reaction of 2,3-Unsubstituted Indoles (1) and Cyclic Azoalkenes (2)a,b
Reaction conditions: 1 (2.0 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol), ZnCl2 (0.1 mmol,
10 mol %), DCM (2.0 mL), 25 °C.Isolated yields.Ring-opened product 4 was also isolated.No annulation occurred when five-membered
cyclic DD was employed
under the optimized reaction conditions (3y, 0%).[12] The relative configurations of cycloadducts 3 were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis of 3e(13) (see the SI for detailed X-ray crystallography data), and those of other compounds
were assigned by analogy.During the investigation on the ring
size effect of the 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene
substrate, it was also noted the formation of ring-opened [4 + 2]
byproduct 4, highlighting the ease of rearomatization
of 3 to give a more stable indole derivative. The sensitivity
of 3 to the rearomatization process was confirmed by
complete transformation of 3b into 4e in
the presence of Amberlyst 15(H) (vide infra, Scheme b). This undesirable
event appears to be the cause for lowering the [4 + 2] cycloaddition
product yields found in some cases. Notably, this pathway remains
dominant when the reaction was conducted using N-methyl indole (1a) or 1,2-dimethyl indole (1o) with linear DDs 2j and 2n (Scheme ) in line with what was previously
observed in the reactions of 2,3- (and 3-)unsubstituted indoles with
cyclic and noncyclic DDs.[7a,10e]
Scheme 4
Control Experiments
Scheme 2
Other Substrates
Scope Studies
More precisely, the
reaction of N-methyl indole
(1a) with linear DD 2n afforded the more
polar ring-opened [4 + 2] product 4a (48% yield). However,
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis revealed the presence of
a mixture of the diastereoisomers of pyridazine 3z. Consistent
with Gilchrist’s observation,[7b] monitoring
the progress of the reaction by 1H NMR, we detected an
initial (preferential) formation of (cis,cis)-3z, which then partially
isomerized to its isomer (cis,trans)-3z either during the course of the
reaction or during chromatographic separation. Despite the isomerization
side reaction, both diastereoisomers were isolated ((cis,cis)/(cis,trans) ∼ 2:1, 32% combined yield) and characterized (see the SI for details). On the other hand, the reaction
of N-methyl indole (1a) with DD 2j or 1,2-dimethyl indole (1o) with DD 2j or 2a led to the formation of the sole ring-opened
[4 + 2] products 4b–d (Scheme ). Therefore, given the results
with the use of both 2,3- and 3-unsubstituted indoles (associated
with the [4 + 2] pyridazine-ring-opening reaction) and to further
showcase the flexibility of this catalytic annulation strategy, we
next moved our attention to exploring the reactivity of C3-blocked
indoles (e.g., 3-substituted and 2,3-disubstitutedindoles) with DDs. To our surprise, the reaction of 3-methyl indole
(1p) with linear DD 2n led to a mixture
of two cycloadducts, the expected tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indolecompound 3ab and the tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indolecompound 5a(14) in a ratio of approximately 1:1, which could possibly be the result
of the above-mentioned two competitive reaction pathways[15] (Scheme ). Interestingly, when 1,3-dimethyl indole (1q) was used in combination with DD 2j, the exclusive
formation of product 5b (46% yield) was detected. As
expected, when the reaction was repeated using cyclic DD 2c, the exclusive formation of the corresponding [4 + 2] product 3ad (40% yield) (Scheme ) was observed. Intrigued by the starkly different
reaction profile, we next focused our attention on the 2,3-disubstitutedindole motif. Unfortunately, the reactions of 2,3-disubstituted indoles
such as 2,3-dimethyl indole 1r and 2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazole 1t with cyclic DD such as 2c did not work well, and only a trace amount of the respective
formal [4 + 2] cycloaddition product was detected in the complex crude
reaction mixture (Scheme ). Explanations for these findings are not immediately intuited,
but the steric effect seems to be playing a major role.To our
pleasure, the reaction of 2,3-dimethyl indole (1r) with
DD 2j proved efficient, leading to the relative
[3 + 2] cycloadduct 5c (58% yield) as the sole product.
Thus, to further extend the substrate scope, a series of differently
2,3-disubstituted indole entities 1r–z containing electron-donating groups (5-OMe and 5-Me) or electron-withdrawing
groups (EWGs) (5-Cl) and 4-ester, 4-amide, or 4-phosphonate N-protected
linear DDs 2j–s were tested. Pleasantly,
all of the reactions proceeded smoothly and furnished the highly crowded
tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole products 5c–s in good to excellent yields (Table ).
Table 2
Scope of
the Zn(II)-Catalyzed [3 +
2] Cycloaddition Reaction of 2,3-Substituted Indoles (1) and Linear Azoalkenes (2)a,b
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.6 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), ZnCl2 (0.04 mmol,
10 mol %), DCM (2.0 mL), 25 °C.Isolated yields.The structures of compounds 5a–s were confirmed by subjecting 5s to N–N bond
cleavage using the Magnus method.[16] Treatment
of compound 5s with ethyl bromoacetate/Cs2CO3/MeCN at 50 °C followed by heating to 80 °C
resulted in N–N′ bond cleavage to the corresponding NH-free tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole6a in 64% isolated yield (Scheme a).As a synthetic strategy, this [3
+ 2] annulation affords, in a
single operation, the structurally rigid 6-5-5 tricyclic subunit with
a substituent at the 3-position of the indole nucleus, which is the
basic structure of pharmaceutically valuable natural products.[4] Besides, this nonclassical approach provides
access to functionalized pyrroloindoline systems with substitution
patterns that are otherwise inaccessible using tryptamines[17] as precursors.The mechanism of the two
divergent cycloadditions was studied by
density functional theory (DFT) computational chemistry (model chemistry:
B3LYP/6-31-G(d)/SCRF = PCM, solvent = DCM,[18,19] Gaussian16 software;[20] all details are
available in the SI). We focused our attention
on the reaction of 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2n (DD) with 3-methyl indole1p (In), since such
a combination affords both cycloaddition products, i.e., (cis,cis)-3ab (with
a de of 99% by 1H NMR) and 5a, in the ratio
of
about 1:1, after column chromatography separation (Scheme ). To begin with, we assumed
a concerted mechanism for the [4 + 2] cycloaddition (Figure a) and a two-step mechanism
for the nonpericyclic [3 + 2] cycloaddition (Figure b).
Figure 2
Catalytic cycles for the model reactants 2n (DD) and 1p (In)
catalyzed by ZnCl2. (a) [4 + 2] cycloaddition: (i) cisoid-DD·ZnCl catalytic complex formation;
(ii) exo or endo adduct formation, exo-In·DD·ZnCl or endo-In·DD·ZnCl; (iii) cycloaddition through the transition
state [TS]‡ affording the pyridazino indoline product
complex, endo-cycle·ZnCl or exo-cycle·ZnCl; (iv) substitution with DD affording (cis,cis)-3ab and cisoid-DD·ZnCl restoration. (b) [3 + 2] Cycloaddition: (v) transoid-DD·ZnCl catalytic complex formation; (vi) nonpericyclic In·DD·ZnCl adduct formation; (vii) [1,6]-addition
to form the zwitterionic intermediate Zw·ZnCl through the transition state [TS1]‡; (viii) ring-closure through [TS2]‡ affording
the nonchelated [3 + 2]-cycle·ZnCl complex, (ix) [1,3]-H shift (tautomerization) giving the pyrazolo
indoline product complex, PI·ZnCl; (x) substitution with DD affording 5b and restoring the transoid-DD·ZnCl. For clarity, the H atoms of the DFT-optimized
structures are omitted.
Catalyticcycles for the model reactants 2n (DD) and 1p (In)
catalyzed by ZnCl2. (a) [4 + 2] cycloaddition: (i) cisoid-DD·ZnCl catalyticcomplex formation;
(ii) exo or endo adduct formation, exo-In·DD·ZnCl or endo-In·DD·ZnCl; (iii) cycloaddition through the transition
state [TS]‡ affording the pyridazino indoline product
complex, endo-cycle·ZnCl or exo-cycle·ZnCl; (iv) substitution with DD affording (cis,cis)-3ab and cisoid-DD·ZnCl restoration. (b) [3 + 2] Cycloaddition: (v) transoid-DD·ZnCl catalyticcomplex formation; (vi) nonpericyclic In·DD·ZnCl adduct formation; (vii) [1,6]-addition
to form the zwitterionic intermediate Zw·ZnCl through the transition state [TS1]‡; (viii) ring-closure through [TS2]‡ affording
the nonchelated [3 + 2]-cycle·ZnCl complex, (ix) [1,3]-H shift (tautomerization) giving the pyrazolo
indoline product complex, PI·ZnCl; (x) substitution with DD affording 5b and restoring the transoid-DD·ZnCl. For clarity, the H atoms of the DFT-optimized
structures are omitted.The computed [4 + 2]
energy reaction paths starting from the cisoid-1,2-diaza-1,3-diene·ZnCl2·catalyticcomplex (cisoid-DD·ZnCl) leading to the complex endo-cycle·ZnCl and to exo-cycle·ZnCl are reported
in Figure a; since
the reaction is highly exoergonic, both reaction trajectories go through
a typical reactant-like transition state [TS]‡ having
pericyclic topology. Both exo and endo transition states ([TS]exo‡ and [TS]endo‡) are shown in Figure b.
Figure 3
(a) DFT-computed Gibbs free energy profile of the rate-limiting
step of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition in CH2Cl2 at
298 K for reagents 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2n and indole 1p. The energies (kcal mol–1) are reported
with respect to the cisoid-DD·ZnCl and In species. (b) Structures
of endo and exo transition states; for clarity, some H atoms have
been omitted.
(a) DFT-computed Gibbs free energy profile of the rate-limiting
step of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition in CH2Cl2 at
298 K for reagents 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2n and indole 1p. The energies (kcal mol–1) are reported
with respect to the cisoid-DD·ZnCl and In species. (b) Structures
of endo and exo transition states; for clarity, some H atoms have
been omitted.The computations show clearly
that the observed high diastereoselectivity
toward the formation of the slightly less stable (cis,cis)-3abpyridazino indoline ((cis,cis)
→ (cis,trans), ΔG° = −2.66
kcal mol–1) is obtained under kineticcontrol. Indeed,
since its endo cyclic precursor is substantially more stable than
the exo adduct (ΔΔG‡ = −1.70 kcal mol–1, mainly for the lack
of the stericclashes of the two methyl groups; see Figure a), the two associated activation
energy barriers are very different (ΔG‡ = 9.02 vs 10.46 kcal mol–1); thus, the endo path is kinetically more favorable. Interestingly,
in both [TS]‡, the ratio between the two forming
C–C and C–N single bonds is about 1.3 (Figure b), which is symptomatic of
an asynchronous concerted transition state.[21]The comparison of the [3 + 2] cycloaddition energy diagram
of the
two stepwise mechanisms with that of the concerted cycloaddition suggested
by Gilchrist et al. with very similar substrates[7b,8] shows
clearly that the latter mechanism is not active in our case (Figure ).
Figure 4
Computed Gibbs free energy
profile of the [3 + 2] cyclization:
stepwise mechanism (blue path) vs the concerted mechanism
(red path) in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The energies
(kcal mol–1) are reported with respect to the transoid-DD·ZnCl and In species. For clarity, the H atoms of transition-state
structures have been omitted.
Computed Gibbs free energy
profile of the [3 + 2] cyclization:
stepwise mechanism (blue path) vs the concerted mechanism
(red path) in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. The energies
(kcal mol–1) are reported with respect to the transoid-DD·ZnCl and In species. For clarity, the H atoms of transition-state
structures have been omitted.The stepwise catalyticcycle is based on the formation of the very
stable transoid-DD·ZnCl (transoid/cisoid, 99.4:0.6; see the SI), followed by the [1,6]-addition of indole to give the
zwitterionic intermediate (Zw·ZnCl) through [TS1]‡; then, the
latter ring closes to form the nonchelated [3 + 2]-cycle·ZnCl complex through [TS2]‡. According to our computations, the energy barriers associated with
these two steps are very similar (ΔG1‡ = 13.41 kcal mol–1vs ΔG2‡ = 12.04 kcal mol–1). However, the catalyticcycle
ends through the following non-rate-limiting steps: [1,3]-H shift
(tautomerization), product delivery, and transoid-DD·ZnCl catalyticcomplex
restoration by substitution with a new molecule of DD.Finally, as a corollary of the above-reported computations,
we
used them to evaluate the order of magnitude of the product ratio
[(cis,cis)-pyridazinio indoline
(3ab)]/[pyrazolo indoline (5b)] in comparison
with the value experimentally obtained (∼1:1, after column
chromatography separation). To this end, we have conveniently summarized
the scheme of the two divergent cyclization reactions as followsSince the two-reactant catalyticcomplexes
(the cisoid-DD·ZnCl and the transoid-DD·ZnCl) are in equilibrium, and their interconversion
is much faster than the cycloaddition reaction rates, it is possible
to apply the Curtin–Hammet equation,[22] which, in our case with a ΔΔG‡ = [TS]endo‡ – [TS1]‡ = 0.50 kcal mol–1, gave a ratio of 7:3, (cis,cis)-3ab and pyrazole
indoline 5b, respectively. We reckon that this result
is fair enough, considering the chemical accuracy attainable via the used model chemistry.Combining the above
experimental results, DFT studies, and available
literature,[7,10e] a reasonable mechanism for these
annulation processes is summarized in Scheme . Two competing (and independent) reaction
pathways for both the tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole and tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole
derivatives appeared to take place upon initial ZnCl2 activation
of the 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene substrate. The [4 + 2] cycloaddition (path
a) can be simply rationalized as a concerted inverse hetero-Diels–Alder
reaction. The preference for an endo cycloaddition
transition state, which requires the cisoid conformation for DD 2 (II), supports the high observed diastereoselectivity
for product 3.[23] Alternatively,
[3 + 2] annulation (path b) can be viewed as proceeding via a stepwise process. Regioselective 1,6-addition of the indole nucleophile 1 on activated DD 2 (I) that is
in a transoid conformation affords the zwitterionic intermediate IV, which undergoes intramolecular 5-exo-trig
cyclization collapsing to the five-membered azomethine imide V. The subsequent 1,3-H shift furnishes via intermediate VI the tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole product 5 and restores the ZnCl2–diene
catalyticcomplex.[24] The fact that the
indole 1q gave both [4 + 2] and [3 + 2] cycloadducts
using cyclic (R4 ≠ H) and linear (R4 =
H) DDs (3advs5b) supported
this mechanism scenario.
Scheme 3
Plausible Reaction Mechanism for Zn(II)-Catalyzed
Annulation Reactions
Likewise, the borderline
example of Scheme in which both cycloadducts 3ab and 5aconcurrently
formed[15] from 1p and 2n illustrates the delicate
balance and subtle nuances between the two annulation processes. It
is evident that, in the presence of additional substituents on the
indole ring (R3 ≠ H), the [3 + 2] mode of addition
becomes competitive since the concerted [4 + 2] pathway is more susceptible
to steric inhibition. Moreover, it was quite interesting to note that
when six-membered cyclic 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2i was reacted
with 1s, the exclusive formation of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition
product 3ae was observed (Scheme c). Similarly, the
use of linear 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene 2t yielded the product 3af (Scheme d). Our control experiments illustrate that the absence of EWG groups
like esters, amides, or phosphonates in the C4 position of the starting
DD (R4 = H; R5 ≠ CO2R, CONR2, and PO(OR)2), which likely disfavors the proton
transfer process (V → VI), also privileged
the [4 + 2] mode of addition.With this work, we have demonstrated that the nature and
type of
substituents of both 1,2-diaza-1,3-diene and indole substrates are
critical factors dictating chemoselectivity in the annulation process.
Notably, the presence of a H atom in the C3 position of the indole
ring is responsible for the observed ring-opened [4 + 2] product 4. As already evidenced, this event becomes prevailing when N-methyl indole (1a) or 1,2-dimethyl indole
(1o) is used as the nucleophile. To our surprise, when
R3 = H, neither the formation of the [3 + 2] annulation
product nor the ring-opened [3 + 2] product of type 7 described by Tan and co-workers was observed.[25] This result shows that when R3 =
H, the indole rearomatization process from 3 (and/or
eventually from intermediate IV) to 4 is
the preferred one.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have
developed substrate-dependent divergent
annulation reactions[26] of indoles with
1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes. By virtue of the versatility of these latter
in switching reactivities, efficient synthesis of two types of polycyclic
fused indoline scaffolds tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indoles and tetrahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles
was achieved. The DFT study revealed that [4 + 2] cycloadditions are
concerted but quite asynchronous, while [3 + 2] reactions go undoubtedly
through a stepwise mechanism. Our approach expands the scope of polycyclic
fused indoline synthesis and increases the flexibility of synthetic
strategies toward heterocycle-based scaffolds. Remarkably, the reactions
feature a high step- and atom-economy, high chemo- and diastereoselectivity,
broad substrate scope, good functional group tolerance, and readily
accessible starting materials. The successful construction of unique
rigid polycyclic skeletons, particularly those with challenging bridgehead N,N-aminal quaternary centers, enriches
the chemistry of both indoles and 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes.
Experimental Section
General Experimental Details
Indoles 1a, 1l, 1m, 1o, 1p, 1r, and 1s are commercially
available
reagents and used without further purification. N-Alkylindole derivatives 1b–k, 1n, and 1q were prepared from corresponding commercially
available NH-indoles following literature procedures.[27] 3,4-Disubstituted indoles 1t–z were synthesized from corresponding phenylhydrazine hydrochlorides
as starting materials via Fisher indole synthesis
according to the literature.[28] 1,2-Diaza-1,3-dienes
(DDs) 2a–t were synthesized from
the corresponding hydrazones following literature procedures.[29] Chromatographic purification of compounds was
carried out on silica gel (60–200 μm). TLC analysis was
performed on preloaded (0.25 mm) glass-supported silica gel plates
(Kieselgel 60); compounds were visualized by exposure to UV light
and by dipping the plates in 1% Ce(SO4)·4H2O and 2.5% (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O in 10% sulfuric acid, followed by heating on
a hot plate. All 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra
were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, using dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO)-d6 or CDCl3 on K2CO3 as the solvent. Chemical shifts (δ scale)
are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the central peak
of the solvent and are sorted in a descending order within each group.
The following abbreviations are used to describe peak patterns where
appropriate: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; sex,
sextet; m, multiplet; and br, broad signal. All coupling constants
(J value) are given in hertz (Hz). Structural assignments
were made with additional information from gradient correlation spectroscopy
(gCOSY), gradient heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation (gHMQC),
gradient heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (gHMBC), and nuclear
Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (NOESY) experiments. Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained as Nujol mulls or neat. High-
and low-resolution mass spectroscopies were performed on a Micromass
Q-ToF Micro mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, U.K.) using
an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Melting points were determined
in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. Elemental analyses were
within ±0.4 of the theoretical values (C, H, N).
General Procedure
for the Formal [4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions
of Indoles 1 with Cyclic Azoalkenes 2
A mixture of indole 1 (2.0 mmol), azoalkene 2 (1.0 mmol), and zinc dichloride (0.1 mmol, 13.6 mg) was
stirred in dry dichloromethane (2 mL). After the disappearance of
azoalkene 2 (TLCcheck), the crude mixture was purified
by column chromatography on silica gel to afford product 3. In some cases (see Table ), a more polar ring-opened [4 + 2] byproduct 4 was also recovered.
The
more polar product was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane
20:80); amorphous white solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.01–7.07 (m, 2H), 6.64 (s,
2H), 6.59 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,
1H), 5.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.88 (m, 2H), 3.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 1.92 (s, 3H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 169.0, 157.5, 151.9, 151.7, 129.1,
127.3, 125.4, 117.8, 107.1, 70.8, 60.9, 44.6, 33.0, 23.0, 14.1; IR
(nujol): υmax = 3309, 3298, 1729, 1678 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 317 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C16H20 N4 O3 (316.35): C 60.75, H 6.37, N 17.71; found: C 60.64,
H 6.49, N 17.56.During the course of the reaction, the following
workup, and the long standing in DMSO-d6 solution at 20 °C for 24 h, the diastereomer (cis,cis)-3z gives a partial isomerization
to more stable (cis,trans)-3z together with the ring-opening reaction leading to the
byproduct 4a. Diastereomers 3z were isolated
in a combined yield of 32%, based on the amount of 1,2-diaza-1,3-dieneconsumed.The relative configurations of diastereomers 3z were
assigned by means of two-dimensional (2D) NOESY experiments.
The product 3af was isolated
by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane 20:80) in 22%
yield (76.9 mg); white solid; mp: 186–188 °C, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.01–7.12 (m, 3H),
6.88 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81–6.85 (m, 2H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (s, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.39 (s, 1H),
2.10 (s, 3H), 1.67 (s, 3H), 1.49 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.8, 155.3, 147.7, 134.2,
131.5, 130.0, 128.3, 127.4, 127.1, 123.9, 118.3, 108.9, 82.8, 54.9,
53.5, 52.3, 24.3, 23.4, 21.7; IR (nujol): υmax =
3290, 1736 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 433 [M + H]+; anal. calcd for C21H23N3O2 (349.43): C 72.18, H 6.63, N 12.03; found:
C 72.03, H 6.72, N 12.17.
General Procedure for the
Formal [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions
of Indoles 1 with Linear Azoalkenes 2
A mixture of indole 1 (0.6 mmol), azoalkene 2 (0.4 mmol), and zinc dichloride (0.04 mmol, 5.45 mg) was
stirred in dry dichloromethane (2 mL). After the disappearance of
azoalkene 2 (TLCcheck), the crude mixture was purified
by column chromatography on silica gel to afford product 5.
The product 5s was isolated by column chromatography (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane
25:75) in 94% yield (129.9 mg); white solid; mp: 155–157 °C.
Notably, compound 5q at NMR analysis shows two sets of peaks. This
fact is probably ascribable to the presence of a second axis along
the N–N bond that determines the existence of syn/anti rotamers
of carbamates.[9,30]1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.59 and 9.38 (s, 1H), 7.32 and 7.29
(d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 and 6.96 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H),
6.59 and 6.56 (dt, J1 = 7.6 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.37 and 6.33 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.67 and 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.63 and 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.75
and 2.69 (s, 3H), 1.99 and 1.95 (s, 3H), 1.45 and 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.30
and 1.26 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.1 and 165.5, 160.9 and 158.8,
157.0 and 156.4, 149.4 and 148.8, 134.4 and 133.1, 127.4 and 127.2,
124.2 and 123.4, 117.5 and 117.1, 105.7 and 104.9, 102.8 and 102.5,
95.5 and 95.1, 55.6 and 55.0, 52.3 and 52.1, 50.1 and 49.8, 29.8 and
27.9, 21.1 and 19.8, 14.2 and 13.6, 12.0 and 11.8; IR (nujol): υmax = 3369, 1741, 1693 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 346 [M + H]+; anal. calcd
for C18H23N3O4 (345.39):
C 62.59, H 6.71, N 12.17; found: C 62.43, H 6.80, N 12.31.
The product 4d was isolated
by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/cyclohexane
60:40) in 61% yield (113.0 mg); white solid; mp: 207–210 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ
9.57 (s, 1H), 7.37 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 =
0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (dt, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 5.84 (br, 2H), 3.94–4.13
(m, 2H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.67–2.91 (m, 2H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.14–2.23
(m, 2H), 1.38–1.59 (m, 4H), 1.09 (t, J = 7.2
Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.2, 157.4, 152.6, 136.2, 135.0,
126.3, 119.8, 119.4, 118.6, 109.3, 108.1, 60.3, 56.9, 35.7, 29.3,
25.5, 24.8, 21.5, 13.9, 11.6; IR (nujol): υmax =
3510, 3393, 3182, 1734, 1687 cm–1; MS (ESI) m/z = 371 [M + H]+; anal. calcd
for C20H26N4O3 (370,45):
C 64.84, H 7.07, N 15.12; found: C 64.69, H 6.99, N 14.99.
Procedure for the Ring-Opening Reaction of Tetrahydro-1H-pyridazino[3,4-b]indole (3b)
To a solution of compound 3b (0.4 mmol) in
dichloromethane (2 mL), Amberlyst 15(H) (500 mg/mmol) was added. After
the disappearance of starting 3b (TLCcheck, 20 h), the
crude mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica gel
to afford product 4e.
Ethyl Bromoacetate-Assisted
Cleavage of the N–N Bond
in 5s (Magnus’ Procedure[16])
Ethyl 2-bromoacetate
(1.5 equiv) and Cs2CO3 (2.5 equiv) were added
to a solution of compound 5s (0.3 mmol) in acetonitrile
(2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred in an oil bath heated at
50 °C until the starting material was consumed (TLCcheck, 1
h) and then refluxed for an additional 1.5 h (TLCcheck). The crude
mixture was filtered and then purified by column chromatography on
silica gel to afford the product 6a. The NMR experiments
show that the title compound has no rotamers.
Authors: John E DeLorbe; David Horne; Richard Jove; Steven M Mennen; Sangkil Nam; Fang-Li Zhang; Larry E Overman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jorge Heredia-Moya; Daniel A Zurita; José Eduardo Cadena-Cruz; Christian D Alcívar-León Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-10-09 Impact factor: 4.927