Kate E Stanley1, Jessica Giordano1, Vanessa Thorsten1, Christie Buchovecky1, Amanda Thomas1, Mythily Ganapathi1, Jun Liao1, Avinash V Dharmadhikari1, Anya Revah-Politi1, Michelle Ernst1, Natalie Lippa1, Halie Holmes1, Gundula Povysil1, Joseph Hostyk1, Corette B Parker1, Robert Goldenberg1, George R Saade1, Donald J Dudley1, Halit Pinar1, Carol Hogue1, Uma M Reddy1, Robert M Silver1, Vimla Aggarwal1, Andrew S Allen1, Ronald J Wapner1, David B Goldstein1. 1. From the Institute for Genomic Medicine at Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center (K.E.S., J.G., A.R.-P., M.E., N.L., H.H., G.P., J.H., V.A., R.J.W., D.B.G.), and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (J.G., R.G., R.J.W.) and Pathology and Cell Biology (C.B., A.T., M.G., J.L., A.V.D., V.A.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York; RTI International, Research Triangle Park (V.T., C.B.P.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham (A.S.A.) - both in North Carolina; the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.); the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (D.J.D.); the Division of Perinatal and Pediatric Pathology, Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University, Providence, RI (H.P.); Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta (C.H.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); and the University of Utah and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (R.M.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the majority of cases, the cause of stillbirth remains unknown despite detailed clinical and laboratory evaluation. Approximately 10 to 20% of stillbirths are attributed to chromosomal abnormalities. However, the causal nature of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions in exomes has been understudied. METHODS: We generated exome sequencing data for 246 stillborn cases and followed established guidelines to identify causal variants in disease-associated genes. These genes included those that have been associated with stillbirth and strong candidate genes. We also evaluated the contribution of 18,653 genes in case-control analyses stratified according to the degree of depletion of functional variation (described here as "intolerance" to variation). RESULTS: We identified molecular diagnoses in 15 of 246 cases of stillbirth (6.1%) involving seven genes that have been implicated in stillbirth and six disease genes that are good candidates for phenotypic expansion. Among the cases we evaluated, we also found an enrichment of loss-of-function variants in genes that are intolerant to such variation in the human population (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 3.06). Loss-of-function variants in intolerant genes were concentrated in genes that have not been associated with human disease (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.41 to 3.34), findings that differ from those in two postnatal clinical populations that were also evaluated in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings establish the diagnostic utility of clinical exome sequencing to evaluate the role of small genomic changes in stillbirth. The strength of the novel risk signal (as generated through the stratified analysis) was similar to that in known disease genes, which indicates that the genetic cause of stillbirth remains largely unknown. (Funded by the Institute for Genomic Medicine.).
BACKGROUND: In the majority of cases, the cause of stillbirth remains unknown despite detailed clinical and laboratory evaluation. Approximately 10 to 20% of stillbirths are attributed to chromosomal abnormalities. However, the causal nature of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions in exomes has been understudied. METHODS: We generated exome sequencing data for 246 stillborn cases and followed established guidelines to identify causal variants in disease-associated genes. These genes included those that have been associated with stillbirth and strong candidate genes. We also evaluated the contribution of 18,653 genes in case-control analyses stratified according to the degree of depletion of functional variation (described here as "intolerance" to variation). RESULTS: We identified molecular diagnoses in 15 of 246 cases of stillbirth (6.1%) involving seven genes that have been implicated in stillbirth and six disease genes that are good candidates for phenotypic expansion. Among the cases we evaluated, we also found an enrichment of loss-of-function variants in genes that are intolerant to such variation in the human population (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46 to 3.06). Loss-of-function variants in intolerant genes were concentrated in genes that have not been associated with human disease (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.41 to 3.34), findings that differ from those in two postnatal clinical populations that were also evaluated in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings establish the diagnostic utility of clinical exome sequencing to evaluate the role of small genomic changes in stillbirth. The strength of the novel risk signal (as generated through the stratified analysis) was similar to that in known disease genes, which indicates that the genetic cause of stillbirth remains largely unknown. (Funded by the Institute for Genomic Medicine.).
Authors: Donald J Dudley; Robert Goldenberg; Deborah Conway; Robert M Silver; George R Saade; Michael W Varner; Halit Pinar; Donald Coustan; Radek Bukowski; Barbara Stoll; Matthew A Koch; Corette B Parker; Uma M Reddy Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Richard D Bagnall; Douglas E Crompton; Slavé Petrovski; Lien Lam; Carina Cutmore; Sarah I Garry; Lynette G Sadleir; Leanne M Dibbens; Anita Cairns; Sara Kivity; Zaid Afawi; Brigid M Regan; Johan Duflou; Samuel F Berkovic; Ingrid E Scheffer; Christopher Semsarian Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Yaping Yang; Donna M Muzny; Jeffrey G Reid; Matthew N Bainbridge; Alecia Willis; Patricia A Ward; Alicia Braxton; Joke Beuten; Fan Xia; Zhiyv Niu; Matthew Hardison; Richard Person; Mir Reza Bekheirnia; Magalie S Leduc; Amelia Kirby; Peter Pham; Jennifer Scull; Min Wang; Yan Ding; Sharon E Plon; James R Lupski; Arthur L Beaudet; Richard A Gibbs; Christine M Eng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kimberly Splinter; David R Adams; Carlos A Bacino; Hugo J Bellen; Jonathan A Bernstein; Alys M Cheatle-Jarvela; Christine M Eng; Cecilia Esteves; William A Gahl; Rizwan Hamid; Howard J Jacob; Bijal Kikani; David M Koeller; Isaac S Kohane; Brendan H Lee; Joseph Loscalzo; Xi Luo; Alexa T McCray; Thomas O Metz; John J Mulvihill; Stanley F Nelson; Christina G S Palmer; John A Phillips; Leslie Pick; John H Postlethwait; Chloe Reuter; Vandana Shashi; David A Sweetser; Cynthia J Tifft; Nicole M Walley; Michael F Wangler; Monte Westerfield; Matthew T Wheeler; Anastasia L Wise; Elizabeth A Worthey; Shinya Yamamoto; Euan A Ashley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Xiaolin Zhu; Slavé Petrovski; Pingxing Xie; Elizabeth K Ruzzo; Yi-Fan Lu; K Melodi McSweeney; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Andreea Nissenkorn; Yair Anikster; Danit Oz-Levi; Ryan S Dhindsa; Yuki Hitomi; Kelly Schoch; Rebecca C Spillmann; Gali Heimer; Dina Marek-Yagel; Michal Tzadok; Yujun Han; Gordon Worley; Jennifer Goldstein; Yong-Hui Jiang; Doron Lancet; Elon Pras; Vandana Shashi; Duncan McHale; Anna C Need; David B Goldstein Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; Eric V Minikel; Kaitlin E Samocha; Eric Banks; Timothy Fennell; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; James S Ware; Andrew J Hill; Beryl B Cummings; Taru Tukiainen; Daniel P Birnbaum; Jack A Kosmicki; Laramie E Duncan; Karol Estrada; Fengmei Zhao; James Zou; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Joanne Berghout; David N Cooper; Nicole Deflaux; Mark DePristo; Ron Do; Jason Flannick; Menachem Fromer; Laura Gauthier; Jackie Goldstein; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Howrigan; Adam Kiezun; Mitja I Kurki; Ami Levy Moonshine; Pradeep Natarajan; Lorena Orozco; Gina M Peloso; Ryan Poplin; Manuel A Rivas; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Samuel A Rose; Douglas M Ruderfer; Khalid Shakir; Peter D Stenson; Christine Stevens; Brett P Thomas; Grace Tiao; Maria T Tusie-Luna; Ben Weisburd; Hong-Hee Won; Dongmei Yu; David M Altshuler; Diego Ardissino; Michael Boehnke; John Danesh; Stacey Donnelly; Roberto Elosua; Jose C Florez; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Stephen J Glatt; Christina M Hultman; Sekar Kathiresan; Markku Laakso; Steven McCarroll; Mark I McCarthy; Dermot McGovern; Ruth McPherson; Benjamin M Neale; Aarno Palotie; Shaun M Purcell; Danish Saleheen; Jeremiah M Scharf; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Ming T Tsuang; Hugh C Watkins; James G Wilson; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur Journal: Nature Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Pleuntje J van der Sluijs; Marieke Joosten; Caroline Alby; Tania Attié-Bitach; Kelly Gilmore; Christele Dubourg; Mélanie Fradin; Tianyun Wang; Evangeline C Kurtz-Nelson; Kaitlyn P Ahlers; Peer Arts; Christopher P Barnett; Myla Ashfaq; Anwar Baban; Myrthe van den Born; Sarah Borrie; Tiffany Busa; Alicia Byrne; Miriam Carriero; Claudia Cesario; Karen Chong; Anna Maria Cueto-González; Jennifer C Dempsey; Karin E M Diderich; Dan Doherty; Stense Farholt; Erica H Gerkes; Svetlana Gorokhova; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Pernille A Gregersen; Scott E Hickey; Mathilde Lefebvre; Francesca Mari; Jelena Martinovic; Hope Northrup; Melanie O'Leary; Kareesma Parbhoo; Sophie Patrier; Bernt Popp; Fernando Santos-Simarro; Corinna Stoltenburg; Christel Thauvin-Robinet; Elisabeth Thompson; Anneke T Vulto-van Silfhout; Farah R Zahir; Hamish S Scott; Rachel K Earl; Evan E Eichler; Neeta L Vora; Yael Wilnai; Jessica L Giordano; Ronald J Wapner; Jill A Rosenfeld; Monique C Haak; Gijs W E Santen Journal: Genet Med Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 8.864
Authors: Hyun Yong Koh; Alireza Haghighi; Christine Keywan; Sanda Alexandrescu; Erin Plews-Ogan; Elisabeth A Haas; Catherine A Brownstein; Sara O Vargas; Robin L Haynes; Gerard T Berry; Ingrid A Holm; Annapurna H Poduri; Richard D Goldstein Journal: Genet Med Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 8.864
Authors: Andrew Z Carey; Nathan R Blue; Michael W Varner; Jessica M Page; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Aaron R Quinlan; D Ware Branch; Robert M Silver; Tsegaselassie Workalemahu Journal: Front Reprod Health Date: 2021-12-15
Authors: Pleuntje J van der Sluijs; Mariëlle Alders; Alexander J M Dingemans; Kareesma Parbhoo; Bregje W van Bon; Jennifer C Dempsey; Dan Doherty; Johan T den Dunnen; Erica H Gerkes; Ilana M Milller; Stephanie Moortgat; Debra S Regier; Claudia A L Ruivenkamp; Betsy Schmalz; Thomas Smol; Kyra E Stuurman; Catherine Vincent-Delorme; Bert B A de Vries; Bekim Sadikovic; Scott E Hickey; Jill A Rosenfeld; Isabelle Maystadt; Gijs W E Santen Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Kevin Eade; Marin L Gantner; Joseph A Hostyk; Takayuki Nagasaki; Christian M Metallo; Martin Friedlander; Rando Allikmets; Sarah Giles; Regis Fallon; Sarah Harkins-Perry; Michelle Baldini; Esther W Lim; Lea Scheppke; Michael I Dorrell; Carolyn Cai; Evan H Baugh; Charles J Wolock; Martina Wallace; Rebecca B Berlow; David B Goldstein Journal: Nat Metab Date: 2021-03-22
Authors: Eugene J Gardner; Matthew D C Neville; Kaitlin E Samocha; Kieron Barclay; Martin Kolk; Mari E K Niemi; George Kirov; Hilary C Martin; Matthew E Hurles Journal: Nature Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Lara Wahlster; Jeffrey M Verboon; Leif S Ludwig; Susan C Black; Wendy Luo; Kopal Garg; Richard A Voit; Ryan L Collins; Kiran Garimella; Maura Costello; Katherine R Chao; Julia K Goodrich; Stephanie P DiTroia; Anne O'Donnell-Luria; Michael E Talkowski; Alan D Michelson; Alan B Cantor; Vijay G Sankaran Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 17.579