Confidence in coping with COVID-19 and its related factors among the public in Taiwan.

Confidence in coping with respiratory infectious diseases (RID) has an influence on the coping strategies that people may use during a pandemic. A study in Hong Kong demonstrated that elderly individuals who had greater confidence were more likely to adopt authority‐suggested preventive behaviors during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) pandemic. We were interested in how confident the people living in Taiwan were in coping with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and what factors might relate to the levels of confidence during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

This online survey study on COVID‐19 in Taiwan used a Facebook advertisement from 10 to 23 April 2020 to recruit participants who were aged ≥20 years and living in Taiwan. The disclosure of the study was listed on the first page of the online survey, and participants voluntarily answered the questionnaires if they agreed. We used the following question, adapted from the questionnaire on risk perception of an RID outbreak, to assess how confident respondents were in coping with COVID‐19: “How confident are you that you can cope well with COVID‐19?” The question was rated from 1 (not confident at all) to 5 (very confident). Those who scored 1 or 2 were identified as having a low level of confidence in coping with COVID‐19, and those with 4 or 5 were identified as having a high level of confidence. The definition of ‘confidence’ in our study is comparable to self‐efficacy, representing the individuals’ beliefs that they have the ability to do specific tasks in the future. We also collected data on the respondents’ age, sex, occupational background (health‐care worker or not), self‐reported mental and physical health status before the COVID‐19 pandemic, risk perception of COVID‐19, adequacy of resources and support against COVID‐19, and perceived social support (Table S1). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and followed the provision of the Declaration of Helsinki.

In total, the data of 1970 respondents were analyzed. Of them, 268 (13.6%) respondents reported a low level of confidence, 751 (38.1%) of them replied neutral, and 951 (48.3%) had a high level of confidence in coping with COVID‐19. The reliability and validity tests for the above measurements were estimated, indicating satisfactory as acceptable range (Table S1–S3). We used stepwise linear regression to examine the factors related to the level of confidence (Table 1). The results indicated that multidimensional factors were significantly associated with a higher level of confidence in coping with COVID‐19, including individual factors (younger age, being male or transgender, being health‐care workers, better self‐reported mental and physical health before the COVID‐19 pandemic), COVID‐19‐specified factors (lower risk perception of COVID‐19, having sufficient basic protective equipment, information about COVID‐19, financial support and medical resources), and social factors (higher perceived social support). We also used a bootstrapping multiple linear regression with 5000 bootstrap samples to verify the results from the above stepwise multivariate linear regression. The results demonstrated that the same patterns of the factors significantly related to the level of confidence in coping with COVID‐19 (Table S4).

Table 1

Factors that were associated with the level of confidence in coping with COVID‐19 examined by stepwise multivariate linear regression (n = 1970)

			Stepwise multivariate regression
Predictors	Mean	SD	β	t	95%CI	P
Age (years)	37.81	10.80	−0.05	−2.23	−0.01, <0.001	0.026
Risk perception of COVID‐19	19.66	4.78	−0.34	−16.64	−0.07, −0.05	<0.001
Perceived social support	8.59	2.01	0.10	5.16	0.03, 0.06	<0.001
Self‐reported physical health	2.05	0.91	0.06	2.90	0.02, 0.10	0.004
Self‐reported mental health	2.36	0.96	0.10	4.39	0.05, 0.12	<0.001
	n	%	β	t	95%CI	P
Sex
Female	1305	66.2	Ref.
Male	650	33.0	0.08	4.29	0.08, 0.22	<0.001
Transgender	15	0.8	0.05	2.53	0.11, 0.84	0.012
Education level
Low (high school or below)	218	11.1	Ref.
High (college or above)	1752	88.9	0.01	0.23	—	0.817 †
Health‐care workers
No	1324	67.2	Ref.
Yes	646	32.8	0.05	2.53	0.02, 0.16	0.011
Sources and support against COVID‐19
Basic equipment
Insufficient	533	27.1	Ref.
Sufficient	1437	72.9	0.06	2.80	0.04, 0.20	0.005
Information about COVID‐19
Insufficient	194	9.8
Sufficient	1776	90.2	0.05	2.12	0.01, 0.25	0.034
Financial support
Insufficient	506	25.7	Ref.
Sufficient	1464	74.3	0.08	3.65	0.07, 0.24	<0.001
Medical resources
Insufficient	425	21.6	Ref.
Sufficient	1545	78.4	0.11	4.38	0.12, 0.31	<0.001
Mental support sources
Insufficient	411	20.9	Ref.
Sufficient	1559	79.1	−0.01	−0.54	—	0.592 †

Excluded from stepwise regression.

CI, confidence interval.

A relatively low proportion (13.6%) of respondents reported low confidence in coping with COVID‐19, which might result from timely border control, application of big data analytics, and experienced teams of officials in Taiwan. Taiwan experienced a severe outbreak of SARS, which made many Taiwanese people vigilant against COVID‐19 and this has aided in COVID‐19 prevention.

Higher social support may decrease uncertain and fearful feelings in the pandemic and increase confidence in coping with COVID‐19. However, the familiar ways to interact with and provide social support to one another may be interrupted during a pandemic. Health professionals should develop alternative ways, such as telephone visits, to provide social support for the public, especially for those who are quarantined.

Sufficient protective equipment, information about COVID‐19, financial support, and medical resources were significantly associated with higher confidence. Research also found that up‐to‐date and accurate health information about COVID‐19 and sufficient protective equipment were associated with less psychological impact. How to deliver information, protective equipment, and resources to all people requires planning ahead of time.

Research reported that current physical symptoms and poor self‐rated health status were significantly associated with greater psychological distress. This study found that better self‐rated mental and physical health before the COVID‐19 outbreak were associated with higher confidence, indicating that good health status may contribute to confronting the unanticipated pandemic with confidence.

Women had lower confidence in coping with COVID‐19 than men and transgender participants. A study in Spain also found that women reported more severe distress and loneliness than men during the COVID‐19 lockdown period. Older people have poorer clinical features and prognoses than young people if infected with COVID‐19. , Older people may also have more difficulties in obtaining the information necessary to cope with the pandemic. These disadvantages may damage older people's morale and confidence. Health‐care workers may have more abundant knowledge about COVID‐19 and thus have higher confidence in coping with the pandemic than non‐health‐care workers.

In conclusion, we found multidimensional factors related to the level of confidence in coping with COVID‐19. Health professionals should take these factors into consideration when developing strategies for enhancing people's confidence in coping with RID in future.

Disclosure statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Table S1. Measures used in this study and exploratory factor analysis.

Table S2. Confirmatory factor analysis for risk perception of COVID‐19.

Table S3. Indices of goodness‐of‐fit index for confirmatory factor analysis at risk perception of COVID‐19.

Table S4. Factors related to confidence in coping with COVID‐19 verified with multivariate linear regression with 5000 bootstrapping samples.

Click here for additional data file.