Literature DB >> 32785937

Guidance on hand jewelry for prevention of COVID-19 transmission in healthcare settings.

Jade Conway1, Albert G Wu1, Shari R Lipner2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32785937      PMCID: PMC7436558          DOI: 10.1111/dth.14178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Ther        ISSN: 1396-0296            Impact factor:   3.858


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Frequent hand washing and donning of personal protective equipment (PPE) are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to limit transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). The CDC mentions evidence that jewelry may harbor microbes, but does not make specific recommendations regarding wearing jewelry in healthcare settings, citing insufficient data. Some hospital infection control policies specify that jewelry be removed in patient care settings. In a study of 134 health care workers in hospitals stipulating no jewelry in the workplace, 45% of individuals continued to wear finger rings or watches. While specific SARS‐CoV‐2 data is unavailable, in this letter, we analyze data on jewelry as a source of microbial transmission and make evidence‐based recommendations to guide physicians regarding wearing hand accessories during the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic. Hand accessories act as surfaces for potential microbial growth and disease transmission (Table 1). In one cross‐sectional study, fluid was collected from sterile gloves of 200 health care workers, and individuals wearing wristwatches had greater skin bacterial counts compared to those without hand jewelry. In a similarly designed study, with 564 cultures obtained from hands of surgical ICU nurses, individuals wearing finger rings had 10‐fold higher median hand bacterial counts, compared to those who abstained from wearing jewelry ; bacterial counts increased step‐wise with each additional ring. Jewelry may act as fomites, particularly if not regularly disinfected. SARS‐CoV‐2 shows the longest surface viability on stainless steel, a common jewelry material. Rings may also inhibit proper hand‐washing technique; in a group of 100 health care workers, there were greater reductions in microbial loads after hand washing in subjects not wearing vs those wearing rings. Microbes may be shielded from detergents on surfaces of wrist and finger jewelry. Jewelry edges may also create skin micro‐tears, which are subject to secondary infections. Therefore, we recommend that physicians remove finger rings and wrist jewelry when caring for patients.
TABLE 1

Associated risks and recommendations for hand jewelry in the healthcare setting

JewelryAssociated pathogensEvidenceRecommendations
Rings

Staphylococcus aureus

Candida albicans

Acinetobacter species

Stenotrophomanas maltophilia

Escherichia coli

Serratia marsencens

Proteus mirabilis

Skin beneath finger rings is more heavily colonized with bacteria than bare digital skin.

Microbial counts increase in a stepwise manner with each additional ring.

Rings may inhibit proper hand washing and drying.

Wearing a metal ring on the finger should be avoided when caring for patients.

A metal ring can be worn on a necklace and tucked under clothing or a disposable gown.

Washable silicone finger rings can be used in place of metal wedding bands. The silicone ring should be removed prior to handwashing and frequently washed with soap and water.

Watches & bracelets

S. aureus

Enterobacteriaceae

Gram‐negative rods

Wrist jewelry may interfere with proper handwashing technique.

Skin cannot be dried properly if wrist jewelry is present.

Handwashing should include the hand and the distal half of the forearm.

All wrist jewelry worn below the elbows should be avoided in health care settings.

Associated risks and recommendations for hand jewelry in the healthcare setting Staphylococcus aureus Candida albicans Acinetobacter species Stenotrophomanas maltophilia Escherichia coli Serratia marsencens Proteus mirabilis Skin beneath finger rings is more heavily colonized with bacteria than bare digital skin. Microbial counts increase in a stepwise manner with each additional ring. Rings may inhibit proper hand washing and drying. Wearing a metal ring on the finger should be avoided when caring for patients. A metal ring can be worn on a necklace and tucked under clothing or a disposable gown. Washable silicone finger rings can be used in place of metal wedding bands. The silicone ring should be removed prior to handwashing and frequently washed with soap and water. S. aureus Enterobacteriaceae Gram‐negative rods Wrist jewelry may interfere with proper handwashing technique. Skin cannot be dried properly if wrist jewelry is present. Handwashing should include the hand and the distal half of the forearm. All wrist jewelry worn below the elbows should be avoided in health care settings. Finger rings and other hand jewelry are associated with higher glove tear rates; finger rings create multiple perforations at the base of gloves. , Bacterial load was similar in those wearing a smooth wedding band vs a ring with a stone (n = 100), however a more complex ring design theoretically increases glove tearing risk. If desired, wedding bands may be worn on a necklace and tucked under clothing. Washable silicone rings may be the safest options for those wishing to wear wedding bands on the finger. The ring should be removed prior to handwashing, with frequent disinfection of the ring itself (Table 1). There is substantial evidence that wearing hand jewelry increases total skin microorganism counts; specific data on SARS‐CoV‐2 and transmission rates require further study. Based on available data, hand jewelry should not be worn in healthcare settings. In conjunction with proper hand‐washing technique and appropriate use of PPE, these suggested modifications might help to prevent unwanted SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission to patients.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Ms. Conway, Mr. Wu, and Dr. Lipner have no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Hand adornment and infection control.

Authors:  Deborah Jane Ward
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2007 Jun 14-27

2.  A prospective comparative study of the relationship between different types of ring and microbial hand colonization among pediatric intensive care unit nurses.

Authors:  Inci Yildirim; Mehmet Ceyhan; Ali Bulent Cengiz; Arzu Bagdat; Cagri Barin; Tezer Kutluk; Deniz Gur
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Factors interfering with the microflora on hands: a regression analysis of samples from 465 healthcare workers.

Authors:  Mette Fagernes; Egil Lingaas
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.