Literature DB >> 3278574

Combination of calcium channel blocker and thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

R Erbel1, T Pop, T Meinertz, K V Olshausen, N Treese, K J Henrichs, C J Schuster, H J Rupprecht, W Schlürmann, J Meyer.   

Abstract

To evaluate the protective effect of nifedipine on ischemic myocardium, in addition to thrombolytic therapy, a total of 149 patients with acute myocardial infarction were included in a double-blind controlled study in which they received 20 mg sublingual nifedipine (74 patients in group 1) or placebo (75 patients in group 2) in the emergency ward, either intracoronary nifedipine, 0.2 mg before and 0.2 mg after reperfusion of the infarct-related vessel and 20 mg three times/day during the hospital stay, or placebo. Combined intravenous and intracoronary thrombolytic therapy was initiated by means of mechanical recanalization in nonreperfused vessels. There were no differences between group 1 and 2 with regard to age, sex, body weight, or location of infarct. Evolution of CK-MB release and cumulative CK-MB was higher in group 1 than in group 2. Changes with regard to regional and global left ventricular function and coronary anatomy were not significantly different (NS) between the two groups. Reocclusion occurred in 15 of 74 (20%) and 10 of 75 (13%) patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. During the reperfusion period, second- and third-degree atrioventricular block occurred in 5.4% and 6.7% (NS), ventricular couplets in 17.6% and 24% (NS), ventricular tachycardia in 2.7% and 9.3%, and ventricular fibrillation in 2.7% and 8% of the patients, respectively. Mortality rates were 13% and 8%. The study demonstrates that even very early administration of nifedipine combined with intracoronary administration does not enhance the salvage of ischemic myocardium achieved by reperfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3278574     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90800-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The role of prophylactic diltiazem therapy and indications for predischarge coronary arteriography.

Authors:  R S Gibson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Therapeutic options in treating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J W Danforth
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-10

3.  Calcium channel antagonists in the modern era of coronary thrombolysis: benefit or detriment?

Authors:  J A Foley; R C Becker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 4.  The role of beta-receptor and calcium-entry-blocking agents in acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: can the results of thrombolytic reperfusion be enhanced?

Authors:  C J Lavie; J G Murphy; B J Gersh
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  Cardioprotective therapeutics--drugs used in hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, thromboembolism, arrhythmias, the postmenopausal state and as anti-oxidants.

Authors:  M J Kendall; I Rajman; S R Maxwell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Protective effects of calcium antagonists against ischaemia and reperfusion damage.

Authors:  R Ferrari; O Visioli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: an overview.

Authors:  P H Held; S Yusuf; C D Furberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-11-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.