Objective to map the current knowledge on recommendations for labor, childbirth, and newborn (NB) care in the context of the novel coronavirus. Method scoping review of papers identified in databases, repositories, and reference lists of papers included in the study. Two researchers independently read the papers' full texts, extracted and analyzed data, and synthesized content. Results 19 papers were included, the content of which was synthesized and organized into two conceptual categories: 1) Recommendations concerning childbirth with three subcategories - Indications to anticipate delivery, Route of delivery, and Preparation of the staff and birth room, and 2) Recommendations concerning postpartum care with four categories - Breastfeeding, NB care, Hospital discharge, and Care provided to NB at home. Conclusion prevent the transmission of the virus in the pregnancy-postpartum cycle, assess whether there is a need to interrupt pregnancies, decrease the circulation of people, avoid skin-to-skin contact and water births, prefer epidural over general anesthesia, keep mothers who tested positive or are symptomatic isolated from NB, and encourage breastfeeding. Future studies are needed to address directed pushing, instrumental delivery, delayed umbilical cord clamping, and bathing NB immediately after birth.
Objective to map the current knowledge on recommendations for labor, childbirth, and newborn (NB) care in the context of the novel coronavirus. Method scoping review of papers identified in databases, repositories, and reference lists of papers included in the study. Two researchers independently read the papers' full texts, extracted and analyzed data, and synthesized content. Results 19 papers were included, the content of which was synthesized and organized into two conceptual categories: 1) Recommendations concerning childbirth with three subcategories - Indications to anticipate delivery, Route of delivery, and Preparation of the staff and birth room, and 2) Recommendations concerning postpartum care with four categories - Breastfeeding, NB care, Hospital discharge, and Care provided to NB at home. Conclusion prevent the transmission of the virus in the pregnancy-postpartum cycle, assess whether there is a need to interrupt pregnancies, decrease the circulation of people, avoid skin-to-skin contact and water births, prefer epidural over general anesthesia, keep mothers who tested positive or are symptomatic isolated from NB, and encourage breastfeeding. Future studies are needed to address directed pushing, instrumental delivery, delayed umbilical cord clamping, and bathing NB immediately after birth.
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the humaninfection caused by the novel
coronavirusSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), named
COVID-19”, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern”(.This infection has been acknowledged as the most disturbing event since World War II
and has put health systems worldwide under unprecedented stress. This context has
led the entire population, health workers, and government officials to experience an
atmosphere of fear and emotional stress, because of its severity and high mortality
rates as well as the lack of sufficient services and equipment to meet the large
demand of patients requiring hospitalization in Intensive Care Units and mechanical
ventilators. On April 30th, 2020, infectious disease experts reported that this
pandemic may last between 18 and 24 months and that everyone should be prepared for
its resurgence after the first wave of contamination(.To decrease infection or prevent the majority of the population from being infected
at the same time, causing the health system to collapse, the WHO and Brazilian
Ministry of Health have recommended social isolation, early detection, reporting, as
well as investigation and appropriate case management(.The novel coronavirus is transmitted through droplets and respiratory secretions of
individuals infected by the disease or through contaminated objects; this virus can
be also transmitted through contaminated feces(. Health workers are advised to observe contact and droplet
precautions, according to the procedures performed. Hence, complete Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) has to be worn, such as disposable waterproof aprons or
gown, goggles, head covers, gloves, and N95 masks or PFF2 respirators. Care is
advised when removing PPE(.Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 may range from mild symptoms such as fever, runny nose, nasal
congestion, dyspnea, malaise, myalgia, and loss of taste up to severe symptoms such
as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Complications are most common, and more
frequently lethal, among elderly individuals and those with comorbidities(. The Brazilian Ministry of Health classified women in the
pregnancy-postpartum cycle and newborns (NB) to be risk groups(, considering that the clinical condition of these
individuals may be aggravated by the infection due to low immunity and poor
tolerance to hypoxia, which culminate in worse outcomes, compared to the population
in general(.The number of pregnant women and NB infected is much lower than that of the general
population, however, pregnant and puerperal women are more vulnerable to COVID-19
and, when they become infected, the symptoms may be more severe. Transmission may
occur from mother to NB in the postpartum and, the NB’s immunological system being
still immature, they are believed to be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Hence, it is recommended to prevent infection of NB through contact with mothers,
close family members, and health workers who are sick or carry the virus(.One study conducted by Chinese researchers analyzed 2,143 cases of children younger
than 18 years, 731 of whom were confirmed and 1,412 considered suggestive due to
their clinical condition, imaging tests, and the fact they had been exposed to
individuals with the virus. The study’s results show that children younger than one
year had their clinical condition worsened(.Decisions concerning the route of childbirth also need to take into account
individual characteristics. As usual, C-sections should be indicated depending on
the maternal and fetal conditions(. Note that even amidst this pandemic, good practices
concerning labor, birth and postpartum care should continue among women who are not
suggestive of being infected or had a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, as well as
women who have recovered from the infection(.There is little scientific evidence for the development of a protocol addressing the
best treatment against the novel coronavirus. Therefore, this study is intended to
map the body of knowledge acquired thus far concerning recommendations for
childbirth, postpartum, and newborn care in the context of the novel coronavirus
pandemic.
Method
A scoping review was chosen because it permits a broad, comprehensive, and systematic
exploration of the findings reported in the literature. This type of study is
appropriate to collect the main recommendations for childbirth and postpartum, as it
provides an overview of existing content without necessarily critiquing the
methodological rigor of findings, an important factor at a time when information is
still uncertain. According to Arksey and O’Malley, this method is implemented in
five stages: (1) establishment of the research question; (2) identification of
relevant studies; (3) selection and inclusion of studies; (4) data organization; and
(5) collection, synthesis, and report of results(. These
stages are individually described, as follows.This review’s research question was: “What body of knowledge is available regarding
the main recommendations for the care provided to parturient and postpartum women
and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic?” This question and the main elements for
the search in this study were based on the PCC strategy (Population, Concept, and
Context), which is the ideal method for a scoping review, according to the protocol
released by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)(. The population includes parturient and postpartum women
and newborns. The main concept addressed here refers to the COVID-19 pandemic and
the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the contexts addressed are labor, childbirth, and
postpartum in addition to the neonatal period.The studies relevant in this review were identified through a search and selection
process conducted in the following databases: Online Medical Literature Search and
Analysis System - MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing
and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science
(WoS), Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and
Brazilian Nursing Database (BDENF). Descriptors that were appropriate to the
databases (Medical Subject Headings - MeSH, CINAHL Headings, and
Health Sciences Descriptors - DeCS) were used, along with keywords to broaden the
search. Unpublished research was searched in the repository of the Brazilian Digital
Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD) and the Theses and Dissertations Catalog
provided by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel
(CAPES). Additionally, the reference lists of the main papers included in the study
were verified to identify other pertinent papers.The search strategy used with the selected terms was (“postpartum women” OR
“postnatal women” OR “perinatal women” OR “pregnant women”) AND (“covid-19” OR
“severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” OR “severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2” OR “2019-nCoV” OR “SARS-CoV-2” OR “2019nCoV” OR
“coronavirus”) AND (parturition OR “labor, obstetric” OR “labor stage, third” OR
“labor stage, fourth” OR childbirth OR delivery OR postpartum OR puerperium OR
“period, postpartum”).The sources included met the following criteria: the full-texts of published or
unpublished literature, written in English, Spanish or Portuguese, with no time
frame. The search was conducted in April 2020 and included studies addressing
maternal and neonatal variables during the childbirth, postpartum and neonatal
periods in the context of the new coronavirus. Studies addressing the gestational
period and prenatal care were excluded, along with papers that did not provide
direct recommendations for the care provided to parturient and puerperal women and
newborns.The results of the search for papers were transferred to the bibliographic manager
Endnote Web, an instrument that permits access by multiple
researchers, the identification of duplicated papers, and the organization of the
references in separate files, according to the database. To minimize selection bias,
two independent researchers read and assessed the studies included. Disagreements
were discussed until a consensus was obtained or with the help of a third
reviewer.Data were extracted and descriptively analyzed using an instrument the authors
developed to characterize the manuscripts (year, country of origin, journal,
authors), addressing methodological characteristics (study design, sample
characteristics, summary of the method), and results (main recommendations to
parturient and puerperal women and NB), and conclusions.Afterward, thematic content analysis was performed to identify the key points,
establish strengths, and the existing gaps in the literature. Finally, the results
were revised regarding the main recommendations and practices performed thus far.
The results were summarized in tables presenting the main findings and information
is presented in the narrative form.Due to the method’s specificity, there was no need to formally assess the
methodological quality of the studies included. This review followed the PRISMA
checklist to ensure methodological rigor and content of the report(.
Results
In total, 108 papers were identified in the databases, while 17 were identified in
reference lists and unpublished research repositories. Of these, 29 appeared more
than once and were removed. Hence, 96 papers were selected to read the titles and
abstracts. Two researchers independently selected the papers, the full texts of
which would be read. Then, 61 documents were excluded. The full texts of the
remaining 35 eligible papers were read and 16 of these papers were excluded because
they did not address the research question or did not provide significant
recommendations to be included in this review. Hence, 19 met the inclusion criteria
and remained in the final sample (Figure
1).
Figure 1
– Flowchart of the paper selection process, PRISMA-ScR. São Paulo,
SP, Brazil, 2020
Most papers included in this review were studies conducted in China (n=13), the
country where the epidemic of the novel coronavirus started. Even after the pandemic
had been reported, other countries also experienced the growing presence of the
novel coronavirus, however, scientific research was still incipient in these
countries, with only two papers conducted in the United States and two in
Singapore.Even though there was an attempt to decrease the language bias, all the studies were
published in English, despite the origin of the publications. Due to the current
nature of the topic addressed, all studies dated from 2020 and comprised the first
scientific documents available thus far. The journals comprised different medical
specialties, not limited to gynecology and obstetrics, showing the importance of
various fields addressing this subject. The characteristics of the studies included
here are detailed in Figure 2.
Figure 2
– Records included by scoping review according to title, journal, and
country of origin. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2020
*USA = United States of America; †BJOG = British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology; ‡BMJ = British Medical
Journal
– Records included by scoping review according to title, journal, and
country of origin. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2020
*USA = United States of America; †BJOG = British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology; ‡BMJ = British Medical
JournalRegarding the methodological designs of the papers included in this review, these
include six retrospective descriptive studies, five reviews, four opinion papers,
three case studies, and one experience report.To facilitate the presentation of information collected from the manuscripts, after
reading and analyzing recommendations, the content was grouped into two general
conceptual categories: 1) Recommendations regarding care provided to childbirth in
the context of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, which consisted of three subcategories
(Indications to anticipate childbirth; Route of childbirth; and Preparation of the
staff and childbirth room), and 2) Recommendations for postpartum care provided in
the context of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, which comprised four subcategories
(Breastfeeding; Newborn care; Hospital discharge; and Care provided to NB at
home).The contents of these categories are described and represented in Figures 3 and 4:
Figure 3
– Main recommendations for childbirth care in the context of
SARS-CoV-2 infection. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2020
*SARS-CoV-2 = Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus;
†NB = Newborn;‡PPE = Personal Protective
Equipment
Figure 4
– Main recommendations for postpartum and newborn care in the context
of SARS-CoV-2 infection. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2020
This scoping review allowed mapping the body of knowledge currently available on how
to deal with COVID-19 during the pregnancy-postpartum cycle and the main
recommendations regarding labor, childbirth, postpartum, and breastfeeding. This
topic should be a priority and has gained attention after a group of Brazilian
researchers developed a survey in the field of women’s health. This document reports
that five deaths caused by COVID-19 occurred in a context of 1,947 deaths while, in
Iran, two maternal deaths were reported in a total of 3,800 deaths. Little has been
mentioned about maternal deaths in the context of the pandemic in European countries
or even in the remaining countries in the Americas. Hence, attention should be drawn
to maternal deaths caused by the novel coronavirus(.Even with limited results concerning how the SARS-CoV-2 infection affects parturient
and postpartum women, greater deterioration of the health condition of mothers has
been observed in Brazil. Therefore, the Brazilian Ministry of Health included
pregnant women, those who gave birth recently, and those who experienced an abortion
or fetal death in the group of risk and provided specific guidelines(. One recent study( addressing 53 Swedish women aged between 20 and 45 years
old identified that 13 of them were in the pregnant-postpartum cycle. The results
show that these pregnant and postpartum women needed intensive care and seven of
them required mechanical ventilation. Even with limitations due to the sample size,
the researchers state that pregnant women more frequently demand intensive care
compared to non-pregnant women. Therefore, greater care is recommended with this
group given the potential of positive cases for SARS-CoV-2 to become more
severe.In this context, a suggestive or confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 has promoted changes
in the context of childbirth and obstetric care that is provided to women with the
infection. There was a need for a rigorous evaluation of pregnancy and fetal status
due to the tendency to fetal growth restriction and greater chances of
prematurity(.Decisions regarding the course of pregnancy or its resolution should take into
account: the mother’s clinical condition, fetal wellbeing, gestational age, and the
mother’s autonomy. As long as the clinical condition of both mother and fetus is
ensured, the ideal time for delivery should be determined by gestational
age(. If, however, the safety of
either mother or fetus is compromised due to SARS or there is no satisfactory
response to the therapy implemented against COVID-19, or yet, in the presence of
severe pneumonia or critical condition, a premature delivery should be considered to
safeguard mother and infant, as an anticipated birth decreases fetal hypoxemia and
the maternal condition is expected to improve(.In some cases, the interruption of pregnancy should be considered, even before fetal
viability is achieved, seeking to improve the mother’s clinical condition,
considering that there is evidence showing rapid recovery of maternal oxygenation
after the procedure[28-29,31]). Any decision by the health staff should consider the mother’s and family’s
principles and desires, without disregarding ethical principles(. These precepts are endorsed by
the International Confederation of Midwives, which reinforce the need of women and
fetuses to be treated with dignity, compassion, and respect(.Regarding the birth route, studies( show
that there is no contraindication for vaginal deliveries if clinical and obstetrical
assessments are favorable. Greater surveillance of both mother and fetus is
recommended through cardiotocography or intermittent auscultation in a short period.
Water births are contraindicated due to the possibility for the mother’s fecal
elimination and water contamination, and consequently, greater risk of contamination
of NB(. C-sections should be
indicated when there is clinical or obstetrical instability in addition to changes
in fetal vitality(. These recommendations are corroborated by
obstetricians in Wuhan, China, who state that C-sections indicated for women with
the infection should be flexible, as the objective is to decrease the length of
hospitalization of mothers to minimize cross-infection and avoid physical exertion,
which is characteristic of normal deliveries(.The staff providing childbirth care must be informed about a suspected or confirmed
diagnosis of COVID-19 to prepare for and implement biosafety measures, as well as to
grant priority for these deliveries to occur in labor, childbirth and postpartum
rooms reserved for those with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2infection(. At the time of delivery, a minimum team of essential
workers should be considered; hygiene measures and protective equipment guidelines
should be rigorously observed; parturient women should wear surgical or N95 masks;
and only one companion should be recommended during labor, childbirth and
postpartum(. This
companion should be someone who lives with the mother, does not belong to a risk
group, does not present any signs and symptoms of the flu; and wears a mask during
his/her entire permanence in the service(.Recommendations to hasten the expulsive period by promoting directed pushing or
instrumental delivery demand caution because there is no consensus and this
procedure may increase the risk of exposure, as it decreases the efficacy of face
masks in preventing the propagation of particles(. Furthermore, there is a lack of evidence on
whether the abbreviation of labor improves maternal and fetal outcomes. Epidural
analgesia is preferred in the case of mothers wishing pharmacological analgesia
during childbirth(. This option
should also be offered in the case of C-sections, considering that general
anesthesia may cause pulmonary complications related to intubation/extubation, in
addition to side effects for NB(.It is important to highlight one review addressing the guidelines concerning pregnant
women and NB in the context of COVID-19, reporting that there is no consensus among
the practices adopted in the different countries and that these recommendations may
differ between countries, as each can give priority to follow local health
government agencies or international organizations(.The Chinese studies included in this review recommend isolating the mother-infant
pair after birth, as this procedure is believed to decrease NB contamination by
SARS-CoV-2. For this reason, these studies recommend delayed umbilical cord clamping
and skin-to-skin contact to be avoided. Therefore, NB should be placed in a warm
crib in an environment different from that of mothers(. One review(, a guide providing guidelines for pregnancy, labor and
childbirth(, and a
technical note from the Brazilian Ministry of Health( report, however, that umbilical cord clamping
among asymptomatic women, and even among women with symptoms, does not need to be
immediate. Because there is no evidence of vertical transmission, optimal timing for
umbilical cord clamping may be chosen instead of immediate clamping.It is important to consider that the pandemic demands that health workers and health
services exercise good judgment and assess each case individually, encouraging and
adopting good practices to promote a positive experience for mothers. The desire and
clinical conditions of women should be taken into account, and physical structures
should be adapted, observing biosafety maneuvers necessary to decrease the chances
of virus transmission(.Vigilant attention should be intensified in the postpartum period to monitor the
mother’s signs and symptoms and detect any worsening of the mothers’ health
conditions early(. Even though
hyperthermia is the symptom most frequently reported in the SARS-CoV-2 infection, a
differential diagnosis should be made, considering that other pathologies may be
associated, while other specific signs and symptoms of the respiratory infection
caused by COVID-19 should be also investigated(.The hospital discharge of mothers depends on their health conditions. Chinese studies
recommend waiting for the minimization or complete disappearance of signs or
symptoms over time. Therefore, postpartum women are expected to present: sustained
normothermia for at least three days; improved respiratory and clinical standards;
involution of acute exudative lesions or lung inflammation; and to test negatively
in Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) twice in a row, with
intervals greater than 24 hours between tests(. The discharge
of mothers in situations of social vulnerability, comorbidities or pregnancy
complications, or with a COVID-19 diagnosis, should occur after health workers
ensure that these women have established a systematic monitoring flow within the
primary health care network and have access to specialized care in case their
condition aggravates(. In such a context, the state of
São Paulo, Brazil establishes that pregnant, parturient and postpartum women are
referred via system by Central de Regulação de Ofertas de Serviços de
Saúde (CROSS) [Central Regulation for the Supply of Health Services],
granting priority to those in this phase of the lifecycle, considering the need for
early detection and severity in this risk group(.Regarding breastfeeding, the postpartum women in China are advised against
breastfeeding based on previous experiences with SARS and also because the antiviral
drug lopinavir/ritonavir, which is chosen for the treatment against COVID-19, is
excreted through breast milk(. Evidence, however, shows that there is no virus in human
breast milk. Therefore, breastfeeding should be encouraged, especially when we
consider the benefits of immunization for the NB(.Currently, the greatest concern with breastfeeding lies in the possibility of infants
being contaminated by the mothers’ respiratory droplets(. To
decrease this risk, mothers are recommended to wear surgical masks during
breastfeeding to protect against coughing or sneezing, in addition to constantly
performing proper hand hygiene. If mothers opt not to breastfeed while the symptoms
remain, health workers should encourage them to pump breast milk and allow another
caregiver, who lives in the same home, to feed the infant(.Bottles, dosing spoons, or glasses used to feed infants with breast milk have to be
sterilized(. A
multi-center retrospective study conducted in Italy addressing 42 women, recommend
physicians and midwives, working in regions with high contamination rates by
COVID-19, to encourage women to wear face masks, both during labor and childbirth
and when providing care to infants and breastfeeding, aiming to decrease
transmission to NB, considering that individuals with the infection may be
asymptomatic(.As for the NB in general, neonatal variables immediately after birth were
satisfactory in terms of weight, height, and Apgar indexes, while no asphyxia or
neonatal death was reported(. Even though infection due to the
COVID-19 is less frequent in this population, attention should be paid to the risk
of infection with greater severity among NB and children under three months of
age(. Therefore, one
should monitor for signs and symptoms, such as dyspnea and tachypnea, hyperthermia
or hypothermia, tachycardia, emesis, gastrointestinal symptoms, and
thrombocytopenia. In the case of infection, early intervention and differential
diagnosis should apply(.After hospital discharge, the routine and care provided at home are important to
prevent the infant and other family members from becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Hence, mothers are recommended to be isolated until the symptoms disappear or
present negative RT-PCR; keep at least two-meter distance from NB when not
breastfeeding or providing childcare; keep bedrooms airy and with appropriate
temperature and humidity levels; minimize or completely disallow visits and physical
contact. It is also important to clean and disinfect the floor and furniture with
alcohol or dissolved chlorinated compounds(. The Brazilian Ministry of Health reports an acceptable
distance of one meter between mother and NB(.The general health aspects of mother and infant should be assessed during home
visits, childcare, and postpartum consultations. Also, checks should include
anthropometric measures, weight gain, reflexes, breastfeeding, contraceptive
methods, how the mother is adapting to the postpartum period, and vital
signs(. Additionally, reproductive planning is indicated
to ensure the safety of contraceptive methods. It should even be intensified,
considering that there is a lack of strong evidence concerning vertical
transmission, premature labor, and restricted intrauterine growth. It is also
noteworthy that parturient and postpartum women and newborns have been included in
vulnerable groups. The choice of the contraceptive should consider the desires of
women and their families, although the intrauterine device is an option that can be
offered in the immediate postpartum period(.Finally, most of the studies included in this scoping review were conducted in China
because it is where the novel coronavirus originated. Retrospective studies were
most frequent, followed by reviews, opinion papers, and experience reports, a fact
that denotes poor scientific evidence. Nonetheless, this scoping review contributes
to scientific advancement as it shows, through the mapping of knowledge available
thus far, the main clinical, obstetrical, and neonatal recommendations to deal with
the COVID-19 among vulnerable groups, the population addressed here. Additionally,
these recommendations can improve reflections on clinical practices. In the
scientific field, this study encourages future studies to involve this topic and
method, considering the high flow of scientific knowledge regarding the novel
coronavirus and the COVID-19.The potential limitations of this scoping review include the fact that most studies
were conducted in a single country (China), which may increase information bias, and
the fact that other socio-cultural contexts are not contextualized. Note also that
there is a lack of controlled clinical trials or observational studies. The sudden
onset of the pandemic and intense flow of information hinders the availability of
strong and/or sound recommendations. The decision to select studies written in three
different languages limited the findings, as most of the scientific knowledge has
been produced in China and was not available in the languages selected for this
review.
Conclusion
Women in the pregnancy-postpartum cycle and NB are more vulnerable to complications
when infected by the novel coronavirus. Thus, it is important to acquire knowledge
on the main recommendations regarding the care that is provided to women during
childbirth, postpartum, and also childcare.Due to the recent emergence of the COVID-19, there is not sufficient scientific
evidence to provide precise guidelines and protocols to fight the disease.
Nonetheless, prior knowledge from different health fields and the results reported
by the papers available enabled mapping the various practices that can be
recommended in obstetrical and neonatal care, as follows: companions and health
workers are supposed to prevent the transmission of the virus to NB by adopting
isolation measures and contact, droplets and/or aerosols precautions; keep strict
hand hygiene; health workers, mothers, and companions must wear PPE when providing
care to NB; consider when a pregnancy should be interrupted or anticipated; decrease
the circulation and number of people involved in the care provided to women and NB.
Skin-to-skin contact during childbirth and water births is not recommended. The
route of childbirth should be chosen following conventional obstetrical indications
and the women’s clinical conditions. If anesthesia is indicated, the epidural is
preferred over general anesthesia.In some cases, women are advised to keep a distance from NB, though each case should
be considered individually, taking into account the desires of women and their
companions. Breastfeeding is recommended even among womeninfected with COVID-19,
provided that they wear surgical masks and observe hand hygiene. When breastfeeding
is impossible, mothers are recommended to express or pump breast milk. Vital signs
should be rigorously assessed and symptoms of this infection identified during
childcare consultations. Also, support such as medication, oxygen, and guidance
concerning sleeping, resting, hydration, feeding should be provided in case of
worsened symptoms, along with multidisciplinary care.Further studies with greater methodological rigor are needed to resolve controversies
regarding directed pushing, instrumental delivery, delayed umbilical cord clamping
and bathing NB immediately after birth. Because this content is new, some
recommendations may change as new knowledge and guidelines emerge in each
country.
Authors: Pradip Dashraath; Jing Lin Jeslyn Wong; Mei Xian Karen Lim; Li Min Lim; Sarah Li; Arijit Biswas; Mahesh Choolani; Citra Mattar; Lin Lin Su Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Anelise de Toledo Bonatti; Nathassia Miller; Maria Antonieta de Barros Leite Carvalhaes; Rodrigo Jensen; Cristina Maria Garcia de Lima Parada Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2021-11-19
Authors: Aleksandra Wesołowska; Magdalena Orczyk-Pawiłowicz; Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura; Małgorzata Gawrońska; Bartłomiej Walczak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 3.390