Literature DB >> 32785156

Complete Chloroplast Genomes and Comparative Analyses of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea (Amaryllidaceae).

Fengjiao Zhang1,2, Tao Wang1,2, Xiaochun Shu1,2, Ning Wang1,2, Weibing Zhuang1,2, Zhong Wang1,2.   

Abstract

The genus Lycoris (about 20 species) includes important medicinal and ornamental plants. Due to the similar morphological features and insufficient genomic resources, germplasm identification and molecular phylogeny analysis are very limited. Here, we sequenced the complete chloroplast genomes of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea; they have very similar morphological traits that make it difficult to identify. The full length of their cp genomes was nearly 158k bp with the same guanine-cytosine content of 37.8%. A total of 137 genes were annotated, including 87 protein-coding genes, 42 tRNAs, and eight rRNAs. A comparative analysis revealed the conservation in sequence size, GC content, and gene content. Some variations were observed in repeat structures, gene expansion on the IR-SC (Inverted Repeat-Single-Copy) boundary regions. Together with the cpSSR (chloroplast simple sequence repeats), these genetic variations are useful to develop molecular markers for germplasm identification. Phylogenetic analysis showed that seven Lycoris species were clustered into a monophyletic group, and closed to Narcissus in Amaryllidaceae. L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. longituba were clustered together, suggesting that they were very likely to be derived from one species, and had the same ancestor with L. squamigera. Our results provided information on the study of genetic diversity, origins or relatedness of native species, and the identification of cultivars.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lycoris; chloroplast genome; comparative analysis; phylogeny

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32785156      PMCID: PMC7461117          DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


1. Introduction

The monocot genus Lycoris (Amaryllidaceae) is a herbaceous perennial species and commonly used as an important medicinal and ornamental plant. It is rich in Amaryllidaceae-type alkaloids that have been used in immunostimulatory, anti-malarial, tumor-suppressing, and viral activity studies [1,2]. It also has been used as a garden flower due to the colorful and special flowers; another feature is the absence of leaves while flowering, so it is also called the lily [3]. Lycoris is native to eastern Asia and confined to temperate China, Japan, and Korea [4]. Lycoris consists of about 20 species, of which 15 species and one variety are distributed in China according to the record of “Flora of China”, which represents the most comprehensive catalog. However, several new species continue to be reported, such as L. hunanensis [5], L. hubeiensis [6], and some hybrids, suggesting that more species are present in the genus than we now recognize. Highly frequent natural hybridization caused the wide morphological variation in the genus, so there was a general assumption that Lycoris is of hybrid origin [7], and L. radiata was considered to be a possible ancestor of the genus Lycori, according to the phylogenetic analysis using chloroplast genome regions, but it is not consistent with the karyotype evolution study [8]. The complex genetic background makes it difficult to identify some species with high similarity on morphology and clarify the phylogenetic analysis. In the past years, to understand the genetic diversity, possible origin species, maternal donors, and an evolutionary relationship of Lycoris, morphological characters [9], plastid DNA sequences (such as matk, rbcL, atpB-rbcL IGS, trnL-F, trnS-trnfM, and trnC-ycf6) [8,10,11] and molecular markers, such as random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers [12], inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers [13], and Start codon targeted polymorphism (SCoT) markers [14] were reported. However, compared to the results of each method, some results were conflicting, suggesting that these selected loci and fragments were not sufficient for the phylogenetic information to elucidate the evolutionary relationships among Lycoris species. In the past decade, the technology of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and the application of DNA barcodes have helped to improve our understanding of the species and relationships in many groups of plants [15,16]. In eukaryotes, the chloroplast is the core organelle for photosynthesis and carbon fixation [17]. Their genome sequences are becoming a very useful tool in identifying closely related plant species, and have been widely used for plant evolution and phylogeny [18,19,20]. The complete chloroplast genome information has enhanced our understanding of plant biology, diversity, and evolutionary relationships. Moreover, it could reveal considerable variation within species in terms of both sequence and structural variation. It has been widely used in many genera and family analysis, such as Prunus [21], Aristolochia [22], and Araceae [23]. Therefore, a more species’ complete chloroplast genome will offer especially valuable information for species identification and conservation of valuable traits, then facilitate the breeding of closely related species and phylogenetic analysis [24]. To date, five Lycoris chloroplast genomes have been reported, with published whole sequences and simple clustering but there have been no reports on the structure and comparative analysis of the cp genomes, which need to be paid more attention to analyze their difference by interspecific comparison. Here, we sequenced three complete chloroplast genomes of Lycoris species, L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea, which have highly similar flowers and are difficult to identify by leaf and bulb morphology. To explore their genetic divergence and phylogenetic relationships, we compared the different characteristics of the cp genomes of these three species and other four reported Lycoris species, they were L. squamigera [25], L. radiata [26], L. longitube [27], and L. sprengeri [28]. An interspecific comparative analyses of the cp genomes provide valuable molecular markers for germplasm identification, and the phylogenetic analysis may significantly improve the low resolution in evolutionary relationships and contribute to the conservation, domestication, and utilization of Lycoris plants.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. General Features of the Lycoris Chloroplast Genomes

Using next-generation sequencing technology, the total DNA of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea were sequenced. As a result, a total of 14 million, 8 million, and 7 million paired-end reads of 150 bp were used for chloroplast genome assembly, and the average organelle coverage reached 14,255×, 8624×, and 7497× sequencing depth, respectively. The organelle assembly NOVOPlasty Version 3.3 [29] was conducted to de novo assemble the cp genomes where the sizes of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea were 158,484 bp, 158,490 bp, and 158,367 bp, respectively (Table 1). The other four reported species are also presented in Table 1. The length of L. radiata and L. aurea was close, L. sprengeri was the longest, and the other four species were ranging from 158,480 to 158,490 bp. Their GC contents were 37.8%. Compared with Allium (Amaryllidaceae) [30], most of their genome size was between 152k bp and 155k bp, the GC content varied from 36.7% to 37.0%. Here, longer cp genome sequences and higher GC content were observed in Lycoris species. They exhibited the typical quadripartite structure, consisting of a large single-copy region (LSC) (86,458–86,612 bp), a small single-copy region (SSC) (16,620–18,540 bp), and a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) (26,731–27,568 bp) (Table 1 and Figure 1).
Table 1

Summary of seven chloroplast genomes of Lycoris species.

Genome Features L. chinensis L. anhuiensis L. aurea L. radiata [26]L. longituba [27]L. sprengeri [28]L. squamigera [25]
Genome size (bp)158,484158,490158,367158,335158,484158,687158,482
LSC size (bp)86,45886,46486,61186,61286,45886,48986,454
SSC size (bp)18,49618,49616,62018,26118,49618,54018,500
IR size (bp)26,76526,76527,56826,73126,76526,82926,764
GC content (%)37.837.837.837.837.837.837.8
No. of genes137137137137137137159
No. of PCGs878787878787105
No. of tRNAs42424242424246
No. of rRNAs8888888

PCGs: protein-coding genes.

Figure 1

The plastome features and morphological characteristics of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea. (A,D) are the plastome features and morphological characteristics of L. chinensis. (B,E) are L. anhuiensis. (C,F) are L. aurea. The schematic map contain four circles from the center going outward, the first circle shows the forward and reverse repeats connected with red and green arcs, respectively. The next circle shows the tandem repeats marked with short bars. The third circle shows the microsatellite sequences. The fourth circle shows the gene structure on the plastome. The genes were colored based on their functional categories. (A–C) represented the L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea, respectively.

In seven Lycoris species, a total of 137 genes were identified, including 87 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 42 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes, of these, 20 genes were duplicated in the different regions (Table 1 and Table 2), suggesting the high conservation of cp genes in Lycoris. In the three species we provided in this study, the gene distribution in L. aurea was slightly different from L. chinensis and L. anhuiensis. In L. aurea, the LSC region contained 63 protein-coding genes (rps12 duplicated) and 21 tRNA genes, of these genes, rps19 distributed in the LSC and IR regions. In L. chinensis and L. anhuiensis, 62 PCGs (rps12 duplicated) and 22 tRNA genes were distributed in the LSC region, which had no rps19 but one more trnN-GUU. In three species, the gene distribution in the SSC region was consistent, which contained 13 PCGs (ycf1 duplicated) and one tRNA, two ycf1 and ndhF spanned the SSC and IR regions (Figure 1). The comparative analysis showed the various number of PCGs and tRNAs in different species, but the rRNA number was conserved, where there were 81–87 PCGs in Allium [30], 79 in Amomum [31], 80 in Croomia and Stemona [20], but they all had eight rRNA genes (duplicated four rRNAs in the IR regions).
Table 2

Gene composition of seven Lycoris chloroplast genomes.

Category of GenesGroup of GenesName of Genes
Genes for photosynthesisSubunits of photosystem IpsaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Subunits of photosystem IIpsbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH,psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbL, psbN, psbT, psbZ, ycf3
Subunits of NADH-dehydrogenasendhA, ndhB (x2), ndhC, ndhD, ndhE, ndhF, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI, ndhJ, ndhK
Subunits of cytochrome b/f complexpetA, petB, petD, petG, petL, petN
Subunits of ATP synthaseatpA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, atpI
Subunit of rubisco rbcL
Self-replicationLarge subunit of ribosomerpl2 (x2), rpl14, rpl16, rpl20, rpl22, rpl23 (x2), rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
DNA dependent RNA polymeraserpoA, rpoB, rpoC1, rpoC2
Small subunit of ribosomerps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 (x2), rps8, rps11, rps12 (x2), rps14, rps15, rps16, rps18, rps19 (x2)
Ribosomal RNAsrrn23S (x2), rrn16S (x2), rrn5S (x2), rrn4.5S (x2)
Transfer RNAstrnA-UGC (x4), trnC-GCA, trnD-GUC, trnE-UUC, trnF-GAA, trnfM-CAU, trnG-GCC, trnG-UCC, trnH-GUG (x2), trnI-CAU (x2), trnI-GAU (x4), trnK-UUU, trnL-CAA (x2), trnL-UAA, trnL-UAG, trnM-CAU, trnN-GUU (x2), trnP-UGG, trnQ-UUG, trnR-ACG (x2), trnR-UCU, trnS-GCU, trnS-GGA, trnS-UGA, trnT-GGU, trnT-UGU, trnV-GAC (x2), trnV-UAC, trnW-CCA, trnY-GUA
Other genesSubunit of Acetyl-CoA-carboxylase accD
c-type cytochrome synthesis gene ccsA
Envelop membrane protein cemA
Protease clpP
Translational initiation factor infA
Maturase matK
UnknownConserved open reading framesycf1 (x3), ycf2 (x2), ycf4
In most plant chloroplast genomes, Group II (G2) introns comprise the majority of noncoding DNA and could provide rich sequence characters for infrageneric and intrafamilial comparative analysis and phylogeny construction [32,33]. The sole group I intron, trnL intron, was not detected in Lycoris species, and the trnL gene itself was lost in their plastomes. In Lycoris, there were 17 same-splitting genes in L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, L. aurea, and L. longituba, 18 in L. radiata and L. sprengeri, including one more ndhF, where the 5′ end exon was located in the IR region and the 3′ end exon and intron were located in the SSR regions. Compared with other Lycoris species, there were only 14 splitting genes in L. squamigera; however, it contained four specific genes (trnS-CGA, rpoC2, trnC-ACA, and trnE-UUC). In all seven cp genomes, there were nine identical splitting genes, which were atpF, rpoC1, ycf3, trnL-UAA, clpP, rpl2, ndhB, trnA-UGC, and ndhA; two of them (ycf3 and clpP) contained two introns and three exons, and others consisted of one intron and two exons (Table S1). In seven Lycoris species, the rps12 intron was lost, which was the same as the three members of Anemone [34]. In L. squamigera, the rpl16 intron was absent, that also occurred in some members of Geraniaceae, Goodeniaceae, and Plumbaginaceae [35,36]. In Lycoris, the rpoC1 intron was located in the LSC region, but it was missing in members of the Poaceae, Aizoaceae, Fabaceae, and in [37,38,39]. The differences of introns between species and conservation in the genus provided information on evolutionary relationships in infrageneric and intergeneric studies.

2.2. cpSSRs Analyses and Repeat Structures

Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs) are typically mononucleotide tandem repeat DNA sequences that are widely used as an important molecular marker for ecological and evolutionary processes in plants [40,41]. When there are no effective genomic resources, the simplicity of PCR amplification and the polymorphism of cpSSRs make it easy to use as a marker for characterizing genetic variation. They commonly show intraspecific variation in repeat numbers when located in the noncoding regions of the cp genome [42,43]. Here, we analyzed the number and type of cpSSRs in seven Lycoris species. There were 46, 45, 54, 53, 46, 46, and 44 SSRs in the L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, L. aurea, L. radiata, L. longaituba, L. sprengeri, and L. squamigera cp genomes, respectively (Figure 2a and Table S2). The SSRs were largely distributed in LSC regions (72.7–79.6%), 9–10 SSRs were in the SSC region, and two SSRs in IR regions in seven species that were analyzed in the present study (Figure 2b). For the different unit size, the mononucleotide was the most frequent, accounting more than 95% of all types in the seven species, in which base T and A were the primary elements, one C motif in five species, and one G only in L. aurea (Figure 2c). There was one dinucleotide (TA) and no tetranucleotide repetition in seven species, showing the conservation among species. However, the trinucleotide (ATT) was detected in only four species, which were L. aurea, L. radiata, L. sprengeri, and L. squamigera, suggesting some variation in different species. Our results showed the intraspecific variation in repeat number, repeats distribution, and repeat motifs, the highly similar morphological characteristics of L. chinensis and L. anhuiensis presented minor SSRs changes. Compared with other published species, the cpSSR loci number ranged from a few to several hundred, such as nice in Cryptomeria japonica [44], 237 in Magnolia kwangsiensis [45]. The cpSSRs number of Lycoris was between 40 and 60, and the cpSSRs were primarily composed of short polyadenine or polythymine repeats but rarely tandem guanine or cytosine repeats, which was consistent with the previous hypothesis [45]. It is the first report about the SSRs of Lycoris complete cp genome, in the absence of genome resources of Lycoris, the cpSSRs were available markers for characterizing genetic variation and could offer unique insights into the evolutionary processes of Lycoris species and their relatives.
Figure 2

Analyses of simple sequence repeats of plastome in seven Lycoris species. (a) Numbers of different repeat types; (b) Frequency of repeat types in LSC, SSC, and IR regions. (c) Numbers of identified SSRs motifs.

2.3. Codon Usage

Codon usage patterns and nucleotide composition of the cp genome could provide a theoretical basis for genetic modification of the chloroplast genome. We deduced the amino acid frequency, the number of codon usage, and the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in the seven Lycoris species (Table S3). Seven species presented the 64 RSCU, and the number of codons ranged from 33,640 to 49,982 in seven species, the least in L. squamigera. L. chinensis and L. anhuiensis had the same patterns of codon usage of numbers and types. Leucine and cysteine were the most and least prevalent amino acids, ATT (encoding isoleucine), and TGA (encoding translational stop) were the most and least used codons in Lycoris, respectively. Except for methionine and tryptophan, almost all amino acids had more than one synonymous codon; of these, leucine, arginine and serine had the most (six codon usages). When the RSCU value was >1.00, we defined that it was preferred, and vice versa. There were 32 preferred and 30 non-preferred (RSCU < 1.00) codon usages were identified in five species, which were L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, L. aurea, L. radiata, and L. longituba, 31 preferred and 30 non-preferred in L. sprengeri, 30 preferred and 31 non-preferred in L. squamigera (Table S3). All seven species had the three same stop codons (TAA, TAG, and TGA). Most of the preferred codon usages end with base A or T, and non-preferred codon usages end with base C or G.

2.4. Inverted Repeats Contraction, Expansion, and Interspecific Comparison

The circular structure of chloroplast genome makes four boundaries among IR, LSC and SSC, which are IRB- LSC, IRB-SSC, IRA-SSC, and IRA-LSC. With the evolution of the genome, the shrinkage and expansion of the IR boundary causes the different sizes of the cp genomes and certain genes to enter the IR region or single-copy region [46]. The IR regions of the seven Lycoris species are shown in Figure 3, where the gene number and order were conserved, but minor differences were still exhibited at the boundaries. The IR-LSC borders of L. radiate and L. aurea were within the rps19, where some of the sequences were in the LSC region, showing a partial duplication, but the other five species exhibited IR expansion, leading to the entire rps19 duplication in the IR regions, which is consistent with some species, such as Vigna radiata [47] and Phaseolus vulgaris [48]. The IR-SSC boundaries of all species are on the ycf1, which is common in angiosperms whose complete copy of ycf1 spanned the SSC-IR regions [49], 925 bp ycf1 duplicated at the IR regions in four species, which were L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, L. longituba, and L. squamigera. The trnH gene is duplicated at the IR regions in all seven species, but there is variation in trnR and trnN genes, which were not detected at the IRa region in L. aurea. By comparing the IRb/SSC and SSC/IRa regions of ndhF, and ycf1, high similarity was revealed in the L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, L. longituba and L. squamigera, L. aurea showed the most obvious difference at IR-SSC boundary (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Comparison of boundary distance of large single-copy regions (LSC), small single-copy regions (SSC), and an inverted repeat (IR) among seven Lycoris chloroplast genomes.

To reveal the conservation and divergence in Lycoris species, interspecific comparisons were performed using online software mVISTA [50,51], which was commonly used to compare the cp genome sequences from two or more species and visualize the alignment results [31,52]. Here, we compared seven species using annotated L. squamigera plastome as a reference, including three species we offered in this study and four species previously reported (Figure 4). The alignment revealed high sequence conservation of the seven Lycoris species, especially in the IR regions, but non-coding regions showed more divergence than the coding regions. The exons of ndhF and ycf1 were presented the most obvious difference with others, which was the same as the IR boundary analysis.
Figure 4

mVISTA identity plot based on the complete cp sequence alignment by Shuffle-LAGAN for seven Lycoris species. L. squamigera was selected as a reference. The pink regions are Conserved Non-Coding Sequences (CNS), the dark blue regions are exons, and the light-blue regions are UTRs. Arrows signifying genes are drawn above the graphs, pointing in the direction of the gene. 70% cut-off identity was used for the plots, and the Y-scale represents the percent identity from 50% to 100%.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

To explore the phylogenetic positions and evolutionary relationships of Lycoris species, we selected 16 species from five families for the construction of maximum likelihood (ML) tree (Figure 5). The complete cp genome sequences and 72 common protein-coding genes were used for analysis, respectively. On the basis of the topologic structure, each of the five selected families (Amaryllidaceae, Asparagaceae, Orchidaceae, Liliaceae, Iridaceae) was clustered into a monophyletic branch respectively. Seven Lycoris species formed a monophyletic clade in both trees. They were close to Narcissus in the Amaryllidaceae. Our previous analysis using four complete cp sequences presented the close relationship between L. longituba and L. squamigera [27], here, because of the addition of three species, it showed a closer relationship among the L. longituba, L. chinensis, and L. anhuiensis, but it was still on a subclade with L. squamigera. The complete cp genome analysis supported a closer relationship between L. chinensis and L. longituba (Figure 5a), but the tree constructed by the PCGs showed a closer relationship between L. chinensis and L. anhuiensis (Figure 5b), which was same with the morphological feature classification. The previous study considered that L. anhuiensis might be another variety of L. longituba [27]. In the present study, two phylogenetic trees showed a tiny difference in their relationship, suggesting that L. anhuiensis, L. longituba and L. chinensis were very likely to be derived from one species, and had the same ancestor with L. squamigera. The flower of L. aurea was similar to L. chinensis, but it was clustered with L. radiata, which shared a similar growth habit. L. sprengeri was separated into an independent branch, which was the same as our previous result [27]. Here, the three species with the most similar morphological characteristics were not clustered together, suggesting the inconsistent of phylogenetic relationships in morphology and genomics.
Figure 5

Phylogenetic relationships of the 16 species by maximum likelihood (ML) analyses. (a) The topology was constructed by the complete cp genome sequences. (b) the tree was constructed based on 72 protein-coding genes.

Before the complete cp sequences were published, interspecific relationship and phylogenetic analysis of Lycoris was commonly relied on rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences [53,54] and some specific plastid gene sequences, such as matK, atpB, rbcL [8], trnS-trnfM, and trnC-ycf6 [11]. However, the result of ITS analysis was different from plastid DNA phylogeny, and different plastid fragments also derived differences in results, natural hybridization, and reticulation of Lycoris may be the initial cause. Considering the Lycoris hybrid origin, maternal inheritance characteristics of chloroplast genome could provide more evidence to clarify their intraspecific evolution. In this study, we sequenced three cp genome of Lycoris, and performed the comparative and phylogenetic analyses with four reported sequences, the result revealed the more accurate relationship of these species. Although it was not included all species in the genus, our result provides more cp genome information of Lycoris, and makes sure the closest relationship between L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis and L. longituba.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection, DNA Extraction, and Sequencing

L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis and L. aurea were planted in Nanjing Botanical Garden, Mem. Sun Yat-sen (E118_83, N32_06), Nanjing, China. Their specimens were stored at the herbarium of Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences with the no. of NAS00591936, NAS00585494, and NAS00585496, respectively. Fresh leaves were collected, quick-freezed in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Huayueyang, Beijing, China) according to the instructions. DNA integrity was examined by electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel, the concentration was measured, and quantified accurately using NanoDrop spectrophotometer 2000 (Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) and Qubit 2.0 respectively. Finally, high-quality DNA was used for libraries’ construction and sequencing, which was sequenced at Novogene (Tianjin, China) using Nova-PE150 strategy with an insert size of 350 bp for high-throughput sequencing following the manufacturer’s protocol.

3.2. Cp Genome Assembly, Annotation and Structure Analysis

The complete cp genomes were assembled by the organelle assembly NOVOPlasty Version 3.3 [29]. The complete cp genome sequence of L. radiata (accession no. MN158120) was selected as a reference [26]. Assembled sequences were manually corrected and circularized by BLASTn comparison with the cp genome of L. radiata. GC content was analyzed using Geneious software (version R11, http://www.geneious.com). Then, the web server CPGAVAS2 (http://www.herbalgenomics.org/cpgavas2) [55] was used for cp genome annotation and visualization with the default parameters. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values were calculated using MEGAX [56]. The obtained cp genome of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), under the accession numbers of L. chinensis (MT700549), L. anhuiensis (MT700550) and L. aurea (MN158985).

3.3. Interspecific Genome Comparison

Four reported complete cp genomes of Lycoris were downloaded from the NCBI database, which were L. squamigera (MH118290), L. radiata (MN158120), L. sprengeri (MN158986), and L. longituba (MN096601). Chloroplast simple sequence repeat (cpSSR) markers were identified using MISA [43]. The definition of microsatellites (unit size/minimum repeats) was (1/10) (2/6) (3/5) (4/5) (5/5) (6/5) and the maximum length of sequence between two SSRs was set as 100. IRscope (https://irscope.shinyapps.io/irapp/) was used for visualizing the genes’ differences on the boundaries of the junction sites of the seven chloroplast genomes [57]. mVISTA web-interface [50] was performed to align and compare the seven Lycoris cp genome sequences. Shuffle-LAGAN was selected as the alignment program for detecting the rearrangements and inversions in sequences.

3.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

In this study, we obtained three Lycoris cp genome sequences, and 13 complete cp sequences of related species were downloaded from the NCBI database, including four Lycoris species, four species in Amaryllidaceae, and five species in the other four families. Their Genbank accession number are shown in Table S4. Both the complete cp genome sequences and 72 common PCGs were used for tree construction. The 72 common PCGs were rps12, psbA, matK, psbK, psbI, atpA, atpF, atpH, atpI, rpoC2, rpoC1, rpoB, petN, psbM, psbD, psbC, psbZ, rps14, psaB, psaA, ycf3, rps4, ndhJ, ndhK, ndhC, atpE, atpB, rbcL, accD, psaI, ycf4, cemA, petA, psbJ, psbL, psbF, psbE, petL, petG, psaJ, rpl33, rps18, rpl20, clpP, psbB, psbT, psbN, psbH, petB, petD, rpoA, rpl36, rps8, rpl14, rpl16, rps3, rpl22, rpl2, rpl23, ycf2, ndhB, rps7, ndhF, ccsA, psaC, ndhE, ndhG, ndhI, ndhA, ndhH, rps15, ycf1, which were extracted and aligned using MAFFT v7.458 [58,59], and manually verified. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenies based on the best-fit model of TVM+F+R2 was conducted using IQ-TREE v. 2.0.3 [60]. The Best-fit model by ModelFinder [61], according to Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the robustness of the topology, was estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the complete cp genome sequences of L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis, and L. aurea were reported, and interspecific comparison of complete cp genome sequences was analyzed for the first time in the genus Lycoris. Compared with the published four cp genome of Lycoris species, we found that the genome size, genomic structure, and gene content of the genus Lycoris were comparatively conserved, but the IR-SC boundary regions were distinct in seven cp genomes. In all seven species, trnH gene was duplicated at the IR regions, but the trnR and trnN genes were variations. Phylogenetic analyses clarified the interspecific relationship among the Lycoris species with whole cp genome sequences. Moreover, we identified the cpSSR sites in different species, together with the highly variable regions identified in interspecific comparison, which could be as useful barcoding markers for the species identification and improve the resolution of phylogenetic relationships within Lycoris.
  41 in total

Review 1.  Amaryllidaceae and Sceletium alkaloids.

Authors:  Zhong Jin
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 13.423

2.  [Genetic variations in trnL-F sequence and phylogenetic clustering of Lycoris species].

Authors:  Ju-Hong Yuan; Shi Sun; Feng Peng; Xu Feng; Yu-Hong Zheng; Bing Xia
Journal:  Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi       Date:  2008-07

3.  Chloroplast DNA sequence utility for the lowest phylogenetic and phylogeographic inferences in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare IV.

Authors:  Joey Shaw; Hayden L Shafer; O Rayne Leonard; Margaret J Kovach; Mark Schorr; Ashley B Morris
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  VISTA : visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length.

Authors:  C Mayor; M Brudno; J R Schwartz; A Poliakov; E M Rubin; K A Frazer; L S Pachter; I Dubchak
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Chloroplast phylogenomic analyses resolve deep-level relationships of an intractable bamboo tribe Arundinarieae (poaceae).

Authors:  Peng-Fei Ma; Yu-Xiao Zhang; Chun-Xia Zeng; Zhen-Hua Guo; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Insights into phylogeny, age and evolution of Allium (Amaryllidaceae) based on the whole plastome sequences.

Authors:  Deng-Feng Xie; Jin-Bo Tan; Yan Yu; Lin-Jian Gui; Dan-Mei Su; Song-Dong Zhou; Xing-Jin He
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Genetic variations in the chloroplast genome and phylogenetic clustering of Lycoris species.

Authors:  Tada-aki Hori; Akiko Hayashi; Tsuneo Sasanuma; Siro Kurita
Journal:  Genes Genet Syst       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.517

8.  CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer.

Authors:  Linchun Shi; Haimei Chen; Mei Jiang; Liqiang Wang; Xi Wu; Linfang Huang; Chang Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Comparative chloroplast genomics: analyses including new sequences from the angiosperms Nuphar advena and Ranunculus macranthus.

Authors:  Linda A Raubeson; Rhiannon Peery; Timothy W Chumley; Chris Dziubek; H Matthew Fourcade; Jeffrey L Boore; Robert K Jansen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome among Prunus mume, P. armeniaca, and P. salicina.

Authors:  Song Xue; Ting Shi; Wenjie Luo; Xiaopeng Ni; Shahid Iqbal; Zhaojun Ni; Xiao Huang; Dan Yao; Zhijun Shen; Zhihong Gao
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 6.793

View more
  9 in total

1.  Over 30 Years of Misidentification: A New Nothospecies Lycoris × jinzheniae (Amaryllidaceae) in Eastern China, Based on Molecular, Morphological, and Karyotypic Evidence.

Authors:  Si-Yu Zhang; Ying-Feng Hu; Hao-Tian Wang; Peng-Chong Zhang; Jian-Wen Shao
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29

2.  Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of six threatened subgenus Gynopodium (Magnolia) species.

Authors:  Huanhuan Xie; Lei Zhang; Cheng Zhang; Hong Chang; Zhenxiang Xi; Xiaoting Xu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.547

3.  Complete chloroplast genome of Ilex dabieshanensis: Genome structure, comparative analyses with three traditional Ilex tea species, and its phylogenetic relationships within the family Aquifoliaceae.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Kun Ning; Zhenghai Mo; Fan Zhang; Yanwei Zhou; Xinran Chong; Donglin Zhang; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Jian Bian; Hong Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Zephyranthes phycelloides (Amaryllidaceae, tribe Hippeastreae) from Atacama region of Chile.

Authors:  Roberto Contreras-Díaz; Mariana Arias-Aburto; Liesbeth van den Brink
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Comparative genomics and phylogenetic relationships of two endemic and endangered species (Handeliodendron bodinieri and Eurycorymbus cavaleriei) of two monotypic genera within Sapindales.

Authors:  Jiaxin Yang; Guoxiong Hu; Guangwan Hu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Key Regulatory Genes Involved in Anthocyanin Metabolism During Flower Development in Lycoris radiata.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Xiaochun Shu; Fengjiao Zhang; Weibing Zhuang; Tao Wang; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Chloroplast Genomes of Genus Tilia: Comparative Genomics and Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  Linjun Yan; Huanli Wang; Xi Huang; Yingchao Li; Yuanhao Yue; Zhongwei Wang; Shijie Tang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Complete chloroplast genomes and comparative analyses of Hippeastrum 'milady', Hippeastrum albertii and Hippeastrum reticulatum (Amaryllidaceae).

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Liu; Ying-Bo Sun; Gen-Fa Zhu; Li-Li Huang; Bo Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis of Complete Plastomes among Aristidoideae Species (Poaceae).

Authors:  Xiu-Xiu Guo; Xiao-Jian Qu; Xue-Jie Zhang; Shou-Jin Fan
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.