| Literature DB >> 32785032 |
Kyoumars Habibi1, Seyedeh Maryam Hoseini2, Majid Dehshti3, Mojtaba Khanian4, Amir Mosavi5,6,7.
Abstract
Cities directly influence microclimates. As the urbanization expands, and the green spaces diminish, the heat islands begin to emerge. An old technique used during the past centuries-in both hot and dry climates of the central cities of Iran-was the moderation of microclimates via water and plants. With a diachronic approach to the study of the historical Chahar Bagh Street in Isfahan, this paper investigates the impact of the structural changes on its microclimate in three different scenarios, i.e., the street with its features during the Safavid Era (from 1501 to 1736); the street in its current status; and finally a probable critical condition resulting from complete elimination of natural elements from the environment. The mixed strategy used in this study relies on logical reasoning and software-assisted evaluation for comparing the three scenarios. The predicted mean vote (PMV) model was used for measuring thermal comfort. The results indicate that the evaluated comfort-providing area in the Safavid scenario is 7-17 times more favorable than the others. Moreover, the temperature in the contemporary era was found to be 1.5 degrees Celsius cooler than that of the critical status scenario.Entities:
Keywords: built environment; climate change; cooling effect; eco-friendly; global warning; natural elements; natural hazards; smart city; sustainable city; sustainable urban development; thermal comfort; urban hazard; urban heat island; urban microclimate
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32785032 PMCID: PMC7460087 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The location of Isfahan City and Chahar Bagh Street.
Figure 2Up: Abbasid Chahar Bagh Street during the Safavid Era based on the descriptions in travelogues and the area under study. Down right: Critical condition. Down middle: Current condition. Down left: Chahar Bagh in Safavid Era.
Figure 3Plantation method based on the location of trees in gardens.
Figure 4The methodological process of the study.
Location and species of trees. (Numbers guide in Figure 3).
| No. | Tree Species | Tree Location |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cedar, pine, shade trees | on the sides of the main streets |
| 2 | mulberry, different types of willow | on the sides of auxiliary streets |
| 3 | shade or fruit trees such as pear, apricot, mulberry and sycamine | in the intersection of auxiliary streets |
| 4 | poplar and aspen along with jujube and silverberry | along garden walls |
| 5 | fig | at the corners of gardens |
| 6 | fruit trees such as peach, walnut, almond and, on the eastern side, grape | in rear garden plots |
| 7 | flowers based on the region’ climate or Medicago sativa | in garden plots near mansions |
| 8 | Medicago sativa (a type of alfalfa grown instead of grass) | between garden plots |
Description of three scenarios of Chahar Bagh Street and climatic components.
| Scenario | Situation | Niasarm Madi | Gardens | Row of Trees | Middle Trees and Street Margins | Water Path and Ponds | Middle Flooring | Street Flooring | Wall Material |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | the Safavid Era | ✓ | ✓ | 1 | Existing (Margin only) | ✓ | stone pavement | stone pavement | Yellow brick |
| 2 | current status | ✓ | ✘ | 2 | existing (The middle and margin) | ✓ | stone pavement | stone pavement | brick and glass |
| 3 | critical condition | ✘ | ✘ | 0 | ✘ | ✘ | Asphalt | Asphalt | Concrete and glass |
| Climate Data (Average 20 years 1998 to July 2017) [ | |||||||||
| Relative humidity | Mean Wind Speed | Precipitation | Wind direction (Prevailing) | Mean Daily Temp | Min Air Temp | Max Air Temp | |||
| %36 | 1.79 m/s | 0.81 mm | 206.19 m/s | 30.37 °C | 17.8 °C | 40.92 °C | |||
Figure 5Simulation of 27 January 2019, for validation purposes.
Figure 6Comparison of temperature in the three scenarios during different hours of the day.
Figure 7Comparison of relative humidity in the three scenarios during different hours of the day.
Figure 8Comparison of thermal comfort in the three scenarios during different hours of the day.
Figure 9Comparison of the area of the urban environment concerning the predicted mean vote (PMV) classification.