Literature DB >> 3278500

Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean section.

N Rawal1, J Schollin, G Wesström.   

Abstract

In a controlled study a single segment combined spinal epidural (CSE) block was compared with epidural block for cesarean section. Thirty healthy parturients were randomly divided into two groups. In both groups a T4 block was aimed at. Bupivacaine was used to provide analgesia in both groups. All patients receiving CSE block had good to excellent analgesia, while 11 patients (74%) receiving epidural block had similar pain relief. This was reflected in the requirement for additional analgesics, sedatives or N2O anesthesia. The muscular relaxation was also better following CSE block. The total dose of bupivacaine for a T4 block was three times larger in patients receiving only epidural block. The maternal and fetal blood bupivacaine levels were correspondingly about three times higher in the epidural group. Additionally, the incidence of maternal hypotension was higher in patients receiving epidural block. Apgar scores, blood gases and neurobehavioural evaluation did not show any differences between the two groups of neonates. No postspinal headache was noted. CSE block appears to combine the reliability of spinal block and the flexibility of epidural block while minimizing their drawbacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3278500     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02689.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  16 in total

1.  Spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine 2% for caesarean section.

Authors:  A Kumar; I Bala; I Bhukal; H Singh
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Combined spinal epidural block versus spinal and epidural block for orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  B Holmström; K Laugaland; N Rawal; S Hallberg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section; needle-through-needle approach.

Authors:  Toshinori Tsutsui; Kumiko Nakamura; Kenji Muranaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  A comparison of femoral/sciatic nerve block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and combined spinal epidural anesthesia for total knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong Hae Kim; Myoung Rae Cho; Si Oh Kim; Jung Eun Kim; Dong Keun Lee; Woon Seok Roh
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-05-24

6.  Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  J Sudharma Ranasinghe; David J Birnbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in advanced labour.

Authors:  A Abouleish; E Abouleish; W Camann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Posture and the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients using the combined spinal epidural technique.

Authors:  M Patel; G Samsoon; A Swami; B Morgan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Does a mid-lumbar block level provide adequate anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy?

Authors:  R A Beers; P B Kane; I Nsouli; D Krauss
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  High-Impact Clinical Studies That Fomented New Developments in Anesthesia: History of Achievements, 1966-2015.

Authors:  Igor Kissin
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.