| Literature DB >> 32784816 |
Yung-Sheng Lin1,2,3, Wen-Ying Huang4, Pang-Yen Ho1, Shiou-Yih Hu1, Ying-Yi Lin1, Cheng-You Chen2, Min-Yun Chang1, Shu-Ling Huang1,2.
Abstract
This study determined the antioxidant activities of juice from Momordica charantia L. (MC) and MC var. abbreviata Ser. (MCVAS) by analyzing 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging ability, ferric reducing power (FRP), and total phenolic content (TPC). The effects of storage time and storage temperature on these antioxidant activities were investigated. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was conducted to identify the major components of MC and MCVAS. The results revealed that the antioxidant activity of MCVAS was better than that of MC, possibly because of richer components of MCVAS. For MC and MCVAS, the scavenging concentrations of 50% DPPH were 3.33 and 1.19 mg/mL, respectively; moreover, the FRP values were 68.93 and 118.14 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/g dry weight, respectively; and the TPC values were 8.15 and 11.47 mg gallic acid equivalent/g dry weight, respectively. The antioxidant activities of MC and MCVAS decreased with storage time. High storage temperature decreased antioxidant activity more quickly than a low temperature. In addition, MC had exhibited a faster decline in DPPH scavenging ability and FRP than MCVAS during 24-day storage, but no difference was observed in TPC.Entities:
Keywords: Momordica charantia L.; Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser.; antioxidant; liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; storage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32784816 PMCID: PMC7464073 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25163614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Bitter gourds used in this study. (a) Momordica charantia L., (b) Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser.
Figure 2Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry results of (a) Momordica charantia L. and (b) Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser. juice. Identified components included (1) phenylalanine; (2) tryptophan; (3) balsaminoside C; (4) goyaglycoside G; (5) vicine; and (6) momordicoside Q.
Mass data of identified compounds in Momordica charantia L. and Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser. juice solutions.
| No. | Molecular Weight (g/mol) | Retention Time (min) | (+)ESI ( | (−)ESI ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 165.19 | 5.2 | 166.05 [M + H]+ | - |
| 2 | 204.23 | 9.1 | 205.05 [M + H]+ | - |
| 3 | 620.87 | 57.1 | - | 619.30 [M − H]− |
| 4 | 811.02 | 67.0 | 812.50 [M + H]+ | - |
| 5 | 304.26 | 70.0 | 327.20 [M + Na]+ | - |
| 6 | 652.87 | 71.1 | 675.55 [M + Na]+ | - |
Figure 3Effects of sample concentration on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity.
Figure 4Effects of sample concentration on (a) ferric reducing power and (b) total phenolic content.
Ferric reducing power and total phenolic content values of Momordica charantia L. and Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser. in this study.
| Properties | Species | |
|---|---|---|
| MC | MCVAS | |
| FRP (mg AAE/g DW) | 68.93 ± 3.32 | 118.14 ± 17.60 |
| TPC (mg GAE/g DW) | 8.15 ± 0.51 | 11.47 ± 0.49 |
Figure 5Effects of storage time on the normalized 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity of Momordica charantia L. and Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser.
Figure 6Effects of storage time on the normalized ferric reducing power of Momordica charantia L. and Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser.
Figure 7Effects of storage time on the normalized total phenolic content of Momordica charantia L. and Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser.