| Literature DB >> 32784638 |
Julian Santiago-Moreno1, Elisabeth Blesbois2.
Abstract
This review provides an updated overview of the seminal plasma composition, and the role of metabolic and protein components on the sperm function of avian species. In addition, the implication of seminal plasma on assisted reproductive techniques of birds was discussed. The semen of birds usually has exceptionally high sperm concentration with relatively little seminal plasma, but this contributes to very fast changes in sperm metabolism and function. The biochemical characteristics and physiological roles of the various seminal plasma components in birds (carbohydrates, lipids, amino acids, hormones, and proteins) are poorly understood. Seminal plasma content of proteins has an action on most cellular functions: metabolism, immunity, oxido-reduction regulation, proteolysis, apoptosis, ion homeostasis, and antimicrobial defenses. The variable amount of many proteins is related to a different fertility capacity of poultry sperm. The role of seminal plasma on semen conservation (chilling and freezing) remains largely a matter of speculation, as both inhibitory and stimulating effects have been found. Whereas the presence of seminal plasma did not seem to affect the sperm survival after freezing-thawing, DNA fragmentation is lower in the absence of seminal plasma. The molecular basis of the influence of seminal plasma on sperm cryo-resistance was also discussed in the present review.Entities:
Keywords: avian species; cryopreservation; lipids; protein; sperm
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32784638 PMCID: PMC7460616 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Lipid composition of seminal plasma from chicken and turkey [9,55,56].
|
|
|
|
| Total lipid (µg mL−1 seminal plasma) | 623.4 | 124 |
| Phospholipid (% of total lipids) | 31.3 | 50.7 |
| Free cholesterol (% of total lipids) | 18.0 | 31.1 |
| Triglycerides (% of total lipids) | 21.1 | 6.8 |
| Free fatty acid (% of total lipids) | 13.7 | 2.5 |
| Cholesterol ester (% of total lipids) | 15.9 | 12.3 |
|
| ||
| Phosphatidyl choline (% of total phospholipids) | 15.5 | 4.6 |
| Phosphatidyl ethanolamine (% of total phospholipids) | 43.6 | 31.5 |
| Sphingomyelin (% of total phospholipids) | 13.4 | 20.3 |
|
|
|
|
| Total lipid (µg mL−1 seminal plasma) | 623.4 | 124 |
| Phospholipid (% of total lipids) | 31.3 | 50.7 |
| Free cholesterol (% of total lipids) | 18.0 | 31.1 |
| Triglycerides (% of total lipids) | 21.1 | 6.8 |
| Free fatty acid (% of total lipids) | 13.7 | 2.5 |
| Cholesterol ester (% of total lipids) | 15.9 | 12.3 |
|
| ||
| Phosphatidyl choline (% of total phospholipids) | 15.5 | 4.6 |
| Phosphatidyl ethanolamine (% of total phospholipids) | 43.6 | 31.5 |
| Sphingomyelin (% of total phospholipids) | 13.4 | 20.3 |
Seminal plasma free amino acid concentrations (mM) from chicken. (Mean, Standard deviation: SD) and their correlation with sperm viability (C:VB) and DNA integrity (C:DNA) after freezing-thawing.
| Glu | Ala | Ser | Val | Gly | Thr | Pro | Asp | Leu | Arg | Ile | Phe | His | Cys | Met | Tyr | Lys | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 44.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| SD | 8.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| C:VB | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||
| C:DNA | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
Glutamic acid (Glu), alanine (Ala), serine (Ser), valine (Val), glycine (Gly), threonine (Thr), proline (Pro), aspartic acid (Asp), leucine (Leu), arginine (Arg), isoleucine (Ile), phenylalanine (Phe), histidine (His), cysteine (Cys), methionine (Met), tyrosine (Tyr), lysine (Lys). (n = 48 samples from Mediterranean chicken breeds). Asterisks indicate amino acid positively correlated (p < 0.05) with sperm viability (evaluated by propidium iodide/SYBR-14) and DNA integrity (evaluated by TUNEL).
Figure 1Respective composition of rooster plasma seminal and sperm proteins. Among the 1165 proteins observed by LC-MS, 22.6% were common to sperm (in blue) and seminal plasma (in green). The same general biological processes were found in both but cytosol products and components of proteasome were mainly extracted from seminal plasma [19].
Figure 2(A,B,C): respective seminal plasma intensity of the signal of SPINK2 protein in highly fertile males (grey) or in subfertile males (black: less than 40% fertility) [19] of 3 highly different lines of chicken (A): Meat line; (B): Laying line; (C): free range line. (D): western blott representation of differences of seminal SPINK2 amount in seminal plasma of highly fertile (good) and subfertile (bad) meat type males. Differences between “good” and “bad” males are highly significant in all cases. (Extracts from Thélie et al. [22]).
Figure 3Percentage of chicken sperm TUNEL + (DNA fragmentation assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling) in fresh sperm and after freezing-thawing samples (n = 90) with or without (w/o) seminal plasma. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).