Literature DB >> 3278428

Reexposure to OKT3 in renal allograft recipients.

J T Mayes1, J R Thistlethwaite, J K Stuart, M R Buckingham, F P Stuart.   

Abstract

Between 40% and 80% of patients treated with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 develop blocking antibody against its idiotypic region. Thus a major concern with the use of OKT3 as part of a baseline immunosuppressive regimen is that formation of blocking antibodies might preclude its subsequent use. Between 7/86 and 2/87, 32 patients received prophylactic OKT3 in addition to low-dose prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. Prophylactic OKT3 did not prevent rejection, as 21 of 32 patients studied developed rejection. Retreatment of 13 patients with OKT3 successfully reversed 12 rejections and lowered the number of T3-positive cells in spite of a low level of blocking antibody in two patients in this group. Of the patients analyzed, 38% developed blocking antibody on initial exposure to OKT3, but OKT3 reuse was denied only 4 patients due to the presence of these antibodies. Three of these had rejections reversed with steroids alone; the other patient lost the allograft. A high frequency of infectious complications occurred in the retreatment group, with viral infections predominating. Only one patient in the retreated group developed antibodies after the second use. Appearance of blocking antibodies after use of OKT3 as part of a base-line prophylactic immunosuppressive regimen did not significantly compromise access to OKT3 for treatment of subsequent rejection episodes, but multiple exposures to OKT3 did increase the frequency of infectious complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3278428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

Review 1.  Targeted kill: from umbrellas to monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  V S Byers; R W Baldwin
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 2.  The role of OKT3 in clinical transplantation.

Authors:  D J Norman; M R Leone
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  S M Tsunoda; F T Aweeka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Therapeutic strategies with monoclonal antibodies and immunoconjugates.

Authors:  V S Byers; R W Baldwin
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 5.  Current status of renal transplantation.

Authors:  M G Suranyi; B M Hall
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-06

6.  Safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of GLQ223 in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex.

Authors:  J O Kahn; K J Gorelick; G Gatti; C J Arri; J D Lifson; J G Gambertoglio; A Bostrom; R Williams
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Muromonab CD3. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Morphology of rat kidney and thymus after native and antibody-coupled cyclosporin A application (reduced toxicity of targeted drug).

Authors:  P Rossmann; B Ríhová; J Strohalm; K Ulbrich
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Anti-OKT3 response following prophylactic treatment in paediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  P Niaudet; G Jean; M Broyer; L Chatenoud
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Evaluation of OKT3 monoclonal antibody and anti-thymocyte globulin in the treatment of steroid-resistant acute allograft rejection in pediatric renal transplants.

Authors:  M Mochon; B Kaiser; J A Palmer; M Polinsky; J T Flynn; G C Caputo; H J Baluarte
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.