Literature DB >> 32784218

Suboptimal prescribing behaviour associated with clinical software design features: a retrospective cohort study in English NHS primary care.

Brian MacKenna1, Helen J Curtis1, Alex J Walker1, Seb Bacon1, Richard Croker1, Ben Goldacre1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) systems are used by clinicians to record patients' medical information, and support clinical activities such as prescribing. In England, healthcare professionals are advised to 'prescribe generically' because generic drugs are usually cheaper than branded alternatives, and have fixed reimbursement costs. 'Ghost-branded generics' are a new category of medicines savings, caused by prescribers specifying a manufacturer for a generic product, often resulting in a higher reimbursement price compared with the true generic. AIM: To describe time trends and practice factors associated with excess medication costs from ghost-branded generic prescribing. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of English GP prescribing data and EHR deployment data.
METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, based on data from the OpenPrescribing.net database from May 2013 to May 2019. Total spending on ghost-branded generics across England was calculated, and excess spend on ghost-branded generics calculated as a percentage of all spending on generics for every CCG and general practice in England, for every month in the study period.
RESULTS: There were 31.8 million ghost-branded generic items and £9.5 million excess cost in 2018, compared with 7.45 million ghost-branded generic items and £1.3 million excess cost in 2014. Most excess costs were associated with one EHR, SystmOne, and it was identified that SystmOne offered ghost-branded generic options as the default. After informing the vendor, the authors monitored for subsequent change in costs, and report a rapid decrease in ghost-branded generic expenditure.
CONCLUSION: A design choice in a commonly used EHR has led to £9.5 million in avoidable excess prescribing costs for the NHS in 1 year. Notifying the vendor led to a change in user interface and a rapid, substantial spend reduction. This finding illustrates that EHR user interface design has a substantial impact on the quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness of clinical practice; this should be a priority for quantitative research. © British Journal of General Practice 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical software; cohort studies; drugs prescribing; ghost-branded generics; primary care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32784218      PMCID: PMC7425205          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  18 in total

1.  Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Peter A Ubel; David A Asch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998-2018: a retrospective database study.

Authors:  Helen J Curtis; Richard Croker; Alex J Walker; Georgia C Richards; Jane Quinlan; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 27.083

3.  Thoughtless design of the electronic health record drives overuse, but purposeful design can nudge improved patient care.

Authors:  Valerie M Vaughn; Jeffrey A Linder
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Generic Medication Prescription Rates After Health System-Wide Redesign of Default Options Within the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Mitesh S Patel; Susan C Day; Scott D Halpern; C William Hanson; Joseph R Martinez; Steven Honeywell; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Trends and variation in prescribing of low-priority treatments identified by NHS England: a cross-sectional study and interactive data tool in English primary care.

Authors:  Alex J Walker; Helen J Curtis; Seb Bacon; Richard Croker; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Spatial distribution of clinical computer systems in primary care in England in 2016 and implications for primary care electronic medical record databases: a cross-sectional population study.

Authors:  Evangelos Kontopantelis; Richard John Stevens; Peter J Helms; Duncan Edwards; Tim Doran; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Impact of NICE guidance on tamoxifen prescribing in England 2011-2017: an interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Helen J Curtis; Alex J Walker; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of drugs for diabetes in England from 1998 to 2017.

Authors:  Helen J Curtis; John M Dennis; Beverley M Shields; Alex J Walker; Seb Bacon; Andrew T Hattersley; Angus G Jones; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Trends and patterns in antibiotic prescribing among out-of-hours primary care providers in England, 2010-14.

Authors:  Michael Edelstein; Adeola Agbebiyi; Diane Ashiru-Oredope; Susan Hopkins
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care.

Authors:  Clare L Brown; Helen L Mulcaster; Katherine L Triffitt; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Katie Reygate; Andrew K Husband; David W Bates; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Electronic Health Record Interface Design on Unsafe Prescribing of Ciclosporin, Tacrolimus, and Diltiazem: Cohort Study in English National Health Service Primary Care.

Authors:  Brian MacKenna; Sebastian Bacon; Alex J Walker; Helen J Curtis; Richard Croker; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  OpenSAFELY: Representativeness of electronic health record platform OpenSAFELY-TPP data compared to the population of England.

Authors:  Colm Andrews; Anna Schultze; Helen Curtis; William Hulme; John Tazare; Stephen Evans; Amir Mehrkar; Sebastian Bacon; George Hickman; Christopher Bates; John Parry; Frank Hester; Sam Harper; Jonathan Cockburn; David Evans; Tom Ward; Simon Davy; Peter Inglesby; Ben Goldacre; Brian MacKenna; Laurie Tomlinson; Alex Walker
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2022-07-18

3.  Clinical coding of long COVID in English primary care: a federated analysis of 58 million patient records in situ using OpenSAFELY.

Authors:  Alex J Walker; Brian MacKenna; Peter Inglesby; Laurie Tomlinson; Christopher T Rentsch; Helen J Curtis; Caroline E Morton; Jessica Morley; Amir Mehrkar; Seb Bacon; George Hickman; Chris Bates; Richard Croker; David Evans; Tom Ward; Jonathan Cockburn; Simon Davy; Krishnan Bhaskaran; Anna Schultze; Elizabeth J Williamson; William J Hulme; Helen I McDonald; Rohini Mathur; Rosalind M Eggo; Kevin Wing; Angel Ys Wong; Harriet Forbes; John Tazare; John Parry; Frank Hester; Sam Harper; Shaun O'Hanlon; Alex Eavis; Richard Jarvis; Dima Avramov; Paul Griffiths; Aaron Fowles; Nasreen Parkes; Ian J Douglas; Stephen Jw Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.