Literature DB >> 32783551

Success of Nonsedated Neuroradiologic MRI in Children 1-7 Years Old.

Camilo Jaimes1,2,3, Caroline D Robson1,3, Fedel Machado-Rivas3,4, Edward Yang1,3, Kellyn Mahan1, Sarah D Bixby1,3, Richard L Robertson1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND. MRI use and the need for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in children have increased. However, MAC is associated with examination delays, increased cost, and safety concerns. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success rate of nonsedated neuroradiologic MRI studies in children 1-7 years old and to investigate factors associated with success. METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed data from our institutional nonsedated MRI program. Inclusion criteria were outpatient nonsedated MRI referral, age 1-7 years old, and neuroradiologic indication. Exclusion criteria were MRI examinations for ventricular checks and contrast material use. Success was determined by reviewing the clinical MRI report. We recorded patient age and sex, type of MRI examination (brain, spine, craniospinal, head and neck, and brain with MRA), protocol length, presence of child life specialist, video goggle use, and MRI appointment time (routine daytime appointment or evening appointment). We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient demographics and clinical data and logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of success in the entire sample. Subset analyses were performed for children from 1 to < 3 years old and 3 to 7 years old. RESULTS. We analyzed 217 patients who underwent nonsedated MRI examinations (median age, 5.1 years). Overall success rate was 82.0% (n = 178). The success rates were 81.4% (n = 127) for brain, 90.3% (n = 28) for spine, 71.4% (n = 10) for craniospinal, 66.7% (n = 6) for head and neck, and 100% (n = 7) for brain with MRA. Age was significantly associated with success (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; p = .009). In children 1 to < 3 years old, none of the factors analyzed were significant predictors of success (all, p > .48). In children 3-7 years old, protocol duration (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; p = .02) and video goggle use (OR, 6.38; 95% CI, 2.16-18.84; p = .001) were significantly associated with success. CONCLUSION. A multidisciplinary approach with age-appropriate resources enables a high success rate for nonsedated neuroradiologic MRI in children 1-7 years old. CLINICAL IMPACT. Using age as the primary criterion to determine the need for MAC may lead to overuse of these services. Dissemination of information regarding nonsedated MRI practice could reduce the rate of sedated MRI in young children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child life therapy; fast MRI; pediatric MRI; sedation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32783551     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of Bone in the Head and Neck Region, is There More Than CT?

Authors:  Karen A Eley; Gaspar Delso
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-16

Review 2.  Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: faster is better.

Authors:  Sebastian Gallo-Bernal; M Alejandra Bedoya; Michael S Gee; Camilo Jaimes
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-10-20

3.  Nonsedated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Visualization of the Velopharynx in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Katelyn J Kotlarek; Thomas J Sitzman; Jessica L Williams; Jamie L Perry
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-11-17

4.  Free induction decay navigator motion metrics for prediction of diagnostic image quality in pediatric MRI.

Authors:  Tess E Wallace; Onur Afacan; Camilo Jaimes; Joanne Rispoli; Kristina Pelkola; Monet Dugan; Tobias Kober; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Safety challenges related to the use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Authors:  Maddy Artunduaga; C Amber Liu; Cara E Morin; Suraj D Serai; Unni Udayasankar; Mary-Louise C Greer; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 6.  Strategies to perform magnetic resonance imaging in infants and young children without sedation.

Authors:  Samantha G Harrington; Camilo Jaimes; Kathryn M Weagle; Mary-Louise C Greer; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-08

Review 7.  Strategies to optimize a pediatric magnetic resonance imaging service.

Authors:  Limin Xu; Jeremy Herrington; Kellie Cahill; Seretha Risacher; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-15

8.  Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs. Oral Chloral Hydrate for Sedation in Children Undergoing Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Lyu; Yujuan Tao; Xiujing Dang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.418

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.