Literature DB >> 32783038

Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements in Newborns: Which Electrode Placement Is Better?

Öznur Yiğit1, Merve Özbal Batuk1, Betül Çiçek Çınar1, Mehtap Yıldırım2, Mehmet Yaralı1, Gonca Sennaroğlu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the fastest and the most effective auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement protocol for audiological diagnosis in babies up to three months of age.
METHODS: Twenty-two newborns (aged 0 to 63 days) who passed the newborn screening test in at least one ear were evaluated in the study. The ABR were recorded with click stimulus using two different electrode montages (1st montage: ipsilateral mastoid, contralateral mastoid, vertex. 2nd montage: nape of the neck, vertex, cheek). Latencies of waves I, III, V and duration of the test were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: Wave V latencies from both electrode montages were statistically shortest at the level of 70 dBnHL and longest at the level of 20 dBnHL (p=0.00). When the duration of the test at three different intensity levels were compared between the two electrode montages, only the test durations at 50 dBnHL were significantly different (p=0.017). The test times at 70 dBnHL in the first montage were observed to be significantly different in babies aged 1 to 30 days and aged 31 to 63 days (p=0.005).
CONCLUSION: In protocols to evaluate the hearing of pediatric groups, it is very important to complete the ABR, which has significant value in early diagnosis, in a short time and reliably. It is concluded that in terms of practicality, the second montage is more advantageous and comfortable for both audiologists and newborns in single channel ABR systems. © Copyright 2020 by Official Journal of the Turkish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing loss; auditory brainstem response; click stimulus; electrode montage; newborn hearing screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 32783038      PMCID: PMC7397534          DOI: 10.5152/tao.2020.5065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 2667-7466


  8 in total

1.  Hearing screening in healthy newborns: feasibility of different methods with regard to test time.

Authors:  M Hahn; A Lamprecht-Dinnesen; A Heinecke; S Hartmann; S Bülbül; G Schröder; J Steinhard; F Louwen; E Seifert
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-12-05       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Newborn hearing screening with combined otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  James W Hall; Steven D Smith; Gerald R Popelka
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 3.  Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence.

Authors:  D C Thompson; H McPhillips; R L Davis; T L Lieu; C J Homer; M Helfand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Oct 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The effects of electrode montage on the amplitude of wave V in the auditory brainstem response to maximum length sequence stimuli.

Authors:  Ahmad Aidil Dzulkarnain; Wayne J Wilson; Andrew P Bradley; Matthew Petoe
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  ABR in newborns: effects of electrode configuration, stimulus rate, and EEG rejection levels on test efficiency.

Authors:  John Stevens; Siobhan Brennan; Denise Gratton; Michael Campbell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Influence of two-electrode montages on the level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp auditory brainstem response (ABR) at multiple intensity levels.

Authors:  Ahmad Aidil Arafat Dzulkarnain; Siti Hajra Mu'minah Noor Ibrahim; Nur Farah Aida Anuar; Siti Aisyah Abdullah; Tengku Zulaila Hasma Tengku Zam Zam; Sarah Rahmat; Muhammad Amar Mohd Ruzai
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Universal newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response: a multisite investigation.

Authors:  D L Stewart; A Mehl; J W Hall; V Thomson; M Carroll; J Hamlett
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  A Comparison of Commercially Available Auditory Brainstem Response Stimuli at a Neurodiagnostic Intensity Level.

Authors:  Devan A Keesling; Jordan Paige Parker; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2017-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.