Literature DB >> 32782458

The National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Research Priority Setting Survey 2018.

Kate C Tatham1,2, Daniel F McAuley3,4, Mark Borthwick5, Neil G Henderson6, Gemma Bashevoy6, Stephen J Brett7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Defining research priorities in intensive care is key to determining appropriate allocation of funding. Several topics were identified from the 2014 James Lind Alliance priority setting exercise conducted with the Intensive Care Society. The James Lind Alliance process included significant (and vital) patient/public contribution, but excluded professionals without a bedside role. As a result it may have failed to identify potential early-stage translational research topics, which are more likely identified by medical and/or academic members of relevant specialist basic science groups. The objective of the present project was to complement the James Lind Alliance project by generating an updated list of research priorities by facilitating academic research input.
METHOD: A survey was conducted by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to identify the key research priorities from intensive care clinicians, including allied health professionals and academics, along with any evolving themes arising from translational research. Feasibility of all identified topics were then discussed and allocated to themes by a joint clinical academics/NIHR focus group.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 94 intensive care clinicians (including subspecialists), academics and allied health professions. In total, 203 research questions were identified, with the top five themes focusing on: appropriate case selection (e.g. who and when to treat; 24%), ventilation (7%), sepsis (6%), delirium (5%) and rehabilitation (5%). DISCUSSION: Utilising a methodology distinct from that employed by the James Lind Alliance process, from a broad spectrum of intensive care clinicians/scientists, enabled identification of a variety of priority research areas. These topics can now inform not only the investigator-led research agenda, but will also be considered in due course by the NIHR for potential future funding calls. © The Intensive Care Society 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensive care; critical care; medicine; research priorities

Year:  2019        PMID: 32782458      PMCID: PMC7401440          DOI: 10.1177/1751143719862244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  2 in total

1.  Research priorities by professional background - A detailed analysis of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Authors:  Nishkantha Arulkumaran; Hannah Reay; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

2.  Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.

Authors:  Oliver Boney; Madeline Bell; Natalie Bell; Ann Conquest; Marion Cumbers; Sharon Drake; Mike Galsworthy; Jacqui Gath; Michael P W Grocott; Emma Harris; Simon Howell; Anthony Ingold; Michael H Nathanson; Thomas Pinkney; Leanne Metcalf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.