Literature DB >> 32781937

The evolution of trust and trustworthiness.

Aanjaneya Kumar1, Valerio Capraro2, Matjaž Perc3,4,5.   

Abstract

Trust and trustworthiness form the basis for continued social and economic interactions, and they are also fundamental for cooperation, fairness, honesty, and indeed for many other forms of prosocial and moral behaviour. However, trust entails risks, and building a trustworthy reputation requires effort. So how did trust and trustworthiness evolve, and under which conditions do they thrive? To find answers, we operationalize trust and trustworthiness using the trust game with the trustor's investment and the trustee's return of the investment as the two key parameters. We study this game on different networks, including the complete network, random and scale-free networks, and in the well-mixed limit. We show that in all but one case, the network structure has little effect on the evolution of trust and trustworthiness. Specifically, for well-mixed populations, lattices, random and scale-free networks, we find that trust never evolves, while trustworthiness evolves with some probability depending on the game parameters and the updating dynamics. Only for the scale-free network with degree non-normalized dynamics, we find parameter values for which trust evolves but trustworthiness does not, as well as values for which both trust and trustworthiness evolve. We conclude with a discussion about mechanisms that could lead to the evolution of trust and outline directions for future work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; prosociality; trust; trustworthiness

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32781937      PMCID: PMC7482572          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  45 in total

1.  Overlapping generations can promote altruistic behavior.

Authors:  P D Taylor; A J Irwin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  A new route to the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  F C Santos; J M Pacheco
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions.

Authors:  Ozgür Gürerk; Bernd Irlenbusch; Bettina Rockenbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Biological signals as handicaps.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men.

Authors:  David G Rand; Victoria L Brescoll; Jim A C Everett; Valerio Capraro; Hélène Barcelo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 6.  Human cooperation.

Authors:  David G Rand; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The evolution of altruistic punishment.

Authors:  Robert Boyd; Herbert Gintis; Samuel Bowles; Peter J Richerson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evolution of cooperation driven by zealots.

Authors:  Naoki Masuda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evolution of trust and trustworthiness: social awareness favours personality differences.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Philip A Stephens; Sasha R X Dall; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Good agreements make good friends.

Authors:  The Anh Han; Luís Moniz Pereira; Francisco C Santos; Tom Lenaerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evolution of cooperation and trust in an N-player social dilemma game with tags for migration decisions.

Authors:  Sandeep Dhakal; Raymond Chiong; Manuel Chica; The Anh Han
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Human infants can override possessive tendencies to share valued items with others.

Authors:  Rodolfo Cortes Barragan; Andrew N Meltzoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Oscillatory dynamics in the dilemma of social distancing.

Authors:  Alina Glaubitz; Feng Fu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  An epidemiological model with voluntary quarantine strategies governed by evolutionary game dynamics.

Authors:  Marco A Amaral; Marcelo M de Oliveira; Marco A Javarone
Journal:  Chaos Solitons Fractals       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.944

5.  Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men.

Authors:  Johanna Brustkern; Markus Heinrichs; Mirella Walker; Bastian Schiller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Stimuli strategy and learning dynamics promote the wisdom of crowds.

Authors:  Li Zhenpeng; Tang Xijin
Journal:  Eur Phys J B       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.500

Review 7.  Mathematical foundations of moral preferences.

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Matjaž Perc
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Artificial intelligence development races in heterogeneous settings.

Authors:  Theodor Cimpeanu; Francisco C Santos; Luís Moniz Pereira; Tom Lenaerts; The Anh Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.