Elham Zanganeh1, Sara Soudi2, Ahmad Zavaran Hosseini1. 1. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Electronic Address: soudi@modares.ac.ir.
Leishmaniasis is among uncontrolled parasitic diseases, which manifests a wide variety of
clinical symptoms that may lead to death. These clinical manifestations depend on Leishmania
species and the host immune system (1). Cutaneous leishmaniasis is caused by Leishmania
major (L. major) and afflicts 0.7-1.2 million cases in the world annually.
Cutaneous leismaniasis has clinical manifestation from selflimiting to chronic signs in
hosts, such as humans and mice (2). Due to the extracellular matrix interfaces, immediately
after entering the parasite, pathogen identification, nitric oxide (NO), and hydrogen
peroxide production by phagocytes is suppressed (3). In resistant mice, (C57BL/6) immune
response is oriented to Th1, associated with the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and
interleukin-12 (IL-12) at the site of infection, which inhibite parasite development.
Susceptible mice (BALB/c) extend Th2 immune response associated with IL-4 production that
terminated to systemic dissemination of the parasite (4).Different approaches have been made for leishmaniasis treatment. The use of antibiotics,
such as pentavalent antimonials, Amphotericin B, and other drugs, are among these
therapeutic approaches. Because of their side effects, toxicity, cost, long term of
treatment, and incomplete elimination of parasite, none of them is an ideal medicine (5).
Different vaccine generations have been developed based on the killed parasite,
liveattenuated parasites, and DNA vaccine; however, they failed to be used in human
vaccination because of their limitations, such as lesion development or long-lasting
recovery (6, 7). Immunotherapy by cytokines like IFN-γ for humans and the use of monoclonal
antibodies for mice are other approaches (8, 9). Nowadays, cell therapy is a modern method
to treat a broad range of infectious diseases. Some studies have shown that dendritic cells
and macrophages can be used to treat leishmaniasis (7, 10).Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with self-renewal property and differentiation potential to
multiple cell lineage are used for repairing tissues and rebuilding damaged organs (11, 12).
They have some receptors that enable them to sense inflammatory conditions and switch
inflammatory responses by secretion of soluble factors and interaction with immune cells
(13, 14). In 2010, pro-inflammatory MSCs1 and antiinflammatory MSCs2 were identified, that
can emerge as immune stimulator cells or immune suppressor cells, respectively, depending on
cytokine milieu (15). MSCs migrate to the inflammation site and induce angiogenesis and
extracellular matrix remodeling by the direction of MQ-M2 responses that terminated to
repair damaged tissues (16). MSCs secrete antimicrobial peptides that enable them to fight
against sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and cystic fibrosisrelated infections
(17). So, MSCs are good candidates for infectious disease therapy, including Tuberculosis,
Malaria, sepsis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and Trypanosoma cruzi
(18). Although the previous report rejects the effectiveness of MSCs in the treatment of
leishmaniasis, our previous findings indicate that MSCs can interact with macrophages and
enhance their immune response by increasing the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)/IL-10
ratio against L. major (19-21).In the present study, the effect of the repeated local injection of MSCs was investigated
on the induction of TH1/TH2 immune responses against L. major and parasite
dissemination. For this purpose, L. major in their footpad injected BALB/c
mice and then received adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) subcutaneously.
Footpad swelling was monitored weekly, and L. major dissemination was
determined by parasite burden analysis. In addition, splenocytes and lymph node cells were
assessed for cytokine and NO production.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Six-to-eight weeks old female BALB/c mice were obtained from the Pasture Institute,
Tehran, Iran. The mice were used for three purposes: L. major
proliferation, AD-MSCs isolation and as experimental groups. The Ethics Committee of
Tarbiat Modares University approved the projects with an ethical code
IR.TMU.REC.1394.180.
L. major culture and Leishmania antigen preparation
L. major promastigotes (MRHO/IR/75/ER strain) were isolated from the
lymph node of the parasite reservoir BALB/c mice. Infected organs were transferred to the
liquid phase of the Novy-MaccNeal-Nicolle medium. The released promastigotes were
proliferated at 26°C in RPMI (Biowest, France) medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum
(FBS, Gibco, USA). The stationary phase promastigotes were used to infect the mice.In order to prepare soluble leishmania antigen (SLA), 109 parasites/ml were
undergone eight cycles of freezing and thawing. SLA containing supernatant was collected
after centrifugation of this suspension at 8000 ɡ for 15 minutes at 4°C and stored at
˗70°C. Soluble antigen protein was measured by Bradford assay.
Isolation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Abdominal adipose tissues of BALB/c mice were removed aseptically. Adipose tissues were
minced and digested with 0.075% type I collagenase in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
(DMEM, Gibco, USA) for 15-20 minutes at 37°C. After centrifugation at 500 g for 5 minutes,
the pellets were resuspended and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM
L-glutamine supplementary, and 1% Pen/Strep (Gibco, USA). The cells incubated in humified
air containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. Expanded adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) used for
injection into mice and characterization.
Characterization of adipose-derived mesenchymal
stem cells
The cell surface markers of AD-MSCs at passage 3 were
analyzed by Flowcytometry using monoclonal antibodies
against mice CD45, CD34, CD90, CD105, CD73, and
CD29 (all of them were purchased from eBioscience,
USA). The cell surface markers were analyzed by the
FACScalibur flowcytometer (BD Biosciences, USA) and
Cyflogics software (CyFlo Ltd., Finland). The ability of
AD-MSCs to differentiate into adipocyte and osteocyte
was examined by Oil Red O (ORO) and Alizarin Red (AR),
respectively. Adipogenic differentiation was induced
by culturing AD-MSCs in a cell differentiation medium
containing 10% FBS, 250 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-
Aldrich, USA), 5 mM insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 0.5
nM 3-isobutyl-1 methylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich, USA)
and 100 mM indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for
21 days. For the purpose of osteogenic differentiation,
the cells were cultured in a cell differentiation medium
containing 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid-2- phosphate (Sigma-
Aldrich, USA), 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich,
USA) and 10 mM beta-glycerophosphate (Merck, UK)
for 21 days.
Experimental groups and treatment protocol
The present research was based on an experimental study. Three study groups, each with 10
mice, were considered in this study. Groups I and II were infected by the footpad
injection of 50 μL phosphate buffered saline (PBS, BioIdea, Iran) containing 1×105
stationary phase L. major promastigotes. Group III received only 50
μL of PBS by footpad injection and was kept as control. Group I was treated by the
subcutaneous injection of 1×105 of AD-MSCs at the infection site. The
injection was repeated four times at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-infection. Group II was
treated with cell-free PBS at the same periods at the infection site. The infected mice
were checked daily. After observing the first symptom of swelling, footpad thickness was
measured weekly by a digital caliper and noted. The experimental groups and their
treatment protocol are shown in Figure 1.Depiction of experimental groups and treatment schedule.
Parasite burden
The spleens of the infected mice were excised, and the number of parasites was counted by
the limiting dilution assay. Briefly, 90 days post-infection, a small fragment of the
infected tissues (spleen) was weighted, homogenized in 2 mL of the Schnider’s Drosophila
medium (Biological Industries, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.1% Gentamicin. Serial
dilution (10-1 to 10-40) was provided and transferred into 96 well
culture plates in triplicate and incubated at 26°C for 2 weeks. The existence of parasite
was observed by an inverted microscope. The last well containing at least a motile
promastigote was noted as parasite dilution. Parasite burden was calculated with this
formula:Parasite burden=-log10 (parasite dilution/tissue weight)
Nitric oxide measurement
Splenocyte and inguinal lymph node cells of five mice from each group were harvested.
After red blood cell (RBC) lysis, the cells were cultured at 2×106 cell/well
of 6-well plates in the RPMI medium containing 10% FBS. Each experimental group was
re-stimulated in vitro with SLA (10 μg/ml) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1 μg/ml) or media.
After 72 hours of the stimulation, the presence of NO was measured by the Griess method.
The absorbance of the developed color was read at 540 nm and converted to NO amount (μM)
according to the standard curve obtained by sodium nitrite (Merck, UK) standard
concentrations. All the in vitro treatments were performed in
triplicate.
Cytokine detection by ELISA
Inguinal lymph node cells and splenocytes of mice from each group were isolated at 90
days post-infection. About 106 cells/well were cultured in 4-well plates in
triplicate and in vitro stimulated with either media or 10 μg/mL of SLA
or 1 μg/mL of phytohemagglutinin (PHA). 72 hours after incubation, the supernatants were
collected and analyzed for the presence of IL-10, IL-4, IFN-γ, and TNF-α by the ELISA
method using kits from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
All parts of this study were repeated three times as three
independent experiments. Three experimental groups,
each with 10 mice, were considered in this study. So,
the data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of
30 mice. Data analysis was carried out by the one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) test according to the SPSS
13.0 (IBM, USA) software, and statistically significant
differences were set at P<0.05.
The AD-MSCs revealed the fibroblast-like morphology
and were able to differentiate into osteocytes and
adipocytes are indicated in Figure 2A, B, C, respectively.
As indicated in Figure 2D, AD-MSCs expressed CD45,
CD34, CD90, CD105, CD73 and CD29 cell surface
markers at percentages of 1.54, 1.12, 44.68, 61.55, 46.82
and 95.7%, respectively.
Fig.2
Characterization of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs). A.
Fibroblast-like AD-MSCs were isolated from the BALB/c mice (×20). B.
Alizarin red staining displayed calcium mineralization of AD-MSCs in osteocyte
differentiation (×20) and C. Oil Red O staining display lipid droplets of
AD-MSCs in adipocyte differentiation (×20). D. The mean percent of the
cell surface markers of AD-MSCs analyzed by flow cytometry.
Footpad swelling measurement
The L. major infected mice were checked daily, and footpad thickness
was measured until 7 weeks after the challenge. The first symptom of swelling without
lesion was observed in the first-week post-infection in both infected groups. In the
second-week post-infection, lesion development was observed in group II, while in the
AD-MSCs recipient group, footpad swelling increased without lesion formation. The footpad
thickness of Group II significantly (P<0.05) increased from the third week to the
seventh week, as in the seventh week, lesion led to footpad necrosis. A significant
decrease (P<0.05) was observed in footpad thickness between the ADMSCs treated
group and non-treated group at weeks 4 to 7 post-infection. In addition, lesion formation
in the AD-MSCs-treated group occurred with high latency and less severity. Group III was
considered as the control without any challenge or cell treatment (Fig .3A).
Fig.3
Evaluation of parasite proliferation and dissemination. A. Footpad thickness of the
AD-MSCs treated group (group I), non-treated group (group II), and control group
(group III). B. The number of parasites in the spleen counted by limiting
dilution assay at 90 days post-infection. BALB/c mice were infected with
1×106 of L. major parasite by footpad injection at day
0. At days 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-infection, the first infected group (group I) was
treated with 5×105 of AD-MSCs. The same volume of PBS (60 μL) was injected
subcutaneously to the second infected group (group II). Data were reported as means ±
SD of 30 mice. The P value was considered significantly at <0.05. A significant
difference between the groups was determined by repeated measure analysis of varience
(ANOVA) by the SPSS software.
The parasite burden of the spleen was measured 90 days post-infection. The result
demonstrated that the injection of AD-MSCs at the infection site affected the L.
major proliferation. As shown in Figure 3B, parasite load in group I treated
with AD-MSCs, was significantly (P<0.05) less than that of the non-treated group
(group II).
Nitric oxide production
NO production was measured 90 days post-infection by the Griess method. The in
vitro LPS treatment could induce the NO production of all the study groups
compared with SLA stimulation (Fig .4A). In addition, the AD-MSCs treatment (group I) did
not affect the NO production of splenocytes compared with the nontreated L.
major infected group (group II). Unlike the spleen, the NO production of the
groin lymph node isolated cells was affected by the AD-MSCs injection. NO production of
both the SLA and LPS stimulated groups was significantly (P<0.05) higher in the
ADMSCs treated group (P<0.05) compared with the nontreated L.
major infected group (Fig .4B).
Fig.4
Nitric oxide (NO) production in the supernatant of experimental groups. A. Spleen
and B. Lymph nodes isolated cells at 90 days post infection. Data were
reported as means ± SD of 30 mice. The groups having significant differences are
indicated by an asterisk (*) sign (P<0.05).
Characterization of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs). A.
Fibroblast-like AD-MSCs were isolated from the BALB/c mice (×20). B.
Alizarin red staining displayed calcium mineralization of AD-MSCs in osteocyte
differentiation (×20) and C. Oil Red O staining display lipid droplets of
AD-MSCs in adipocyte differentiation (×20). D. The mean percent of the
cell surface markers of AD-MSCs analyzed by flow cytometry.Evaluation of parasite proliferation and dissemination. A. Footpad thickness of the
AD-MSCs treated group (group I), non-treated group (group II), and control group
(group III). B. The number of parasites in the spleen counted by limiting
dilution assay at 90 days post-infection. BALB/c mice were infected with
1×106 of L. major parasite by footpad injection at day
0. At days 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-infection, the first infected group (group I) was
treated with 5×105 of AD-MSCs. The same volume of PBS (60 μL) was injected
subcutaneously to the second infected group (group II). Data were reported as means ±
SD of 30 mice. The P value was considered significantly at <0.05. A significant
difference between the groups was determined by repeated measure analysis of varience
(ANOVA) by the SPSS software.AD-MSCs; Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells and PBS; Phosphate
buffered saline.Nitric oxide (NO) production in the supernatant of experimental groups. A. Spleen
and B. Lymph nodes isolated cells at 90 days post infection. Data were
reported as means ± SD of 30 mice. The groups having significant differences are
indicated by an asterisk (*) sign (P<0.05).
Splenocyte cytokine production
Splenocyte of each group was isolated and treated with media, SLA, and PHA. After 72
hours of incubation, the supernatants were collected and evaluated for IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-4,
and TNF-α cytokine analysis by the ELISA method. As indicated in Figure 5A and 5C, IFN-γ,
and IL-4 production increased in the L. major infected groups compared
with the non-infected control group. However, no significant difference was observed in
terms of IL-4 production between the AD-MSCs treated (group I) and non-treated (group II)
groups. IL-10 and TNF-α production increased in splenocytes of the L.
major infected groups at 90 days post-infection. According to Figure 5B, D, the
ADMSCs treatment could induce higher IL-10 and TNF-α production in response to LPS and SLA
stimulation, compared with the non-treated group (group II).
Fig.5
Cytokine assays in the supernatants of the splenocytes of different experimental groups.
A. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), B. Interleukin-10 (IL-10),
C. IL-4, and D. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data
were reported as means ± SD of 30 mice. The groups having significant differences
(P≤0.05) are indicated by an asterisk (*) sign.
Cytokine production in the lymph node
The lymph node cells of each group were isolated and then treated with media, SLA, or
PHA. After 72 hours of incubation, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-4, and TNF-α cytokine production was
measured by the ELISA method. As indicated in Figure 6A and 6B, the production of IFN-γ
and TNF-α was induced significantly (P<0.05) in the lymph node of the
AD-MSCs-treated group compared with the non-treated infected mice. Although interleukin-10
production was more in the L. major infected group than in control, the
increase in the ADMSCs treated group (group I) was significantly lower than that in the
non-treated group (group II) (Fig .6C). Moreover, there was no significant difference in
IL-4 production of both the AD-MSCs treated and nontreated L. major
infected groups (Fig .6D).
Fig.6
Cytokine assays in tha supernatants of the lymph node isolated cells at 90 days post-infection.
A. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), B. Interleukin-10 (IL-10),
C. IL-4, and D. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). Data
were reported as means ± SD of 30 mice. The groups having significant differences
(P.0.05) are indicated by an asterisk (*) sign.
Cytokine assays in the supernatants of the splenocytes of different experimental groups.
A. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), B. Interleukin-10 (IL-10),
C. IL-4, and D. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data
were reported as means ± SD of 30 mice. The groups having significant differences
(P≤0.05) are indicated by an asterisk (*) sign.Cytokine assays in tha supernatants of the lymph node isolated cells at 90 days post-infection.
A. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), B. Interleukin-10 (IL-10),
C. IL-4, and D. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). Data
were reported as means ± SD of 30 mice. The groups having significant differences
(P.0.05) are indicated by an asterisk (*) sign.
Discussion
Leishmaniasis is one of the neglected parasitic diseases that is transmitted by sandflies
in tropical areas (22). These intracellular pathogens spread by targeting immune cells and
induction of inappropriate immune responses that terminated to loss of proper functioning of
the infected organs (23). Drug toxicity and the emergence of resistance, along with the lack
of approved protective vaccines, indicated the need for new therapeutic approaches (7, 24).
The ability of MSCs to modulate immune responses made them as therapeutic tools of
inflammatory disorders, including infectious disease (25). Different studies demonstrated
the direct or indirect effect of MSCs therapy on T-cell count and differentiation in
infectious disease. Allam et al. (26) showed that MSCs therapy of HIV patients induces a
significant increase in naive and memory CD4+T cells and restores their ability to produce
IL-2 and IFN-γ in response to HIV antigens. In another study, Thakur et al. (27) introduced
the protective role of MSCs in malaria infection by the suppression of IL10 and regulatory
T-cell differentiation and induction of IL-12 production. In the current study, the
potential effects of the adipose-derived MSC therapy evaluated on parasite dissemination and
induction of TH1/TH2 responses in a murine model of cutaneous leishmaniasis. AD-MSCs
considered in this research because the preparation of human adipose tissue is easy,
non-invasive, and ethically accepted (28). In addition, adipose-derived MSCs have a more
homogeneous population than those derived from bone marrow (29).Following the footpad injection of leishmania, the immune cells migrated into the infection
site, and inflammatory responses appeared, resulting in an increase in the thickness of the
footpad. If the protective innate immune responses developed, the proliferation of the
parasite would be limited, and the inflammatory responses would decrease. In other words, if
the unprotected inflammatory responses were created, the accelerated proliferation of the
parasite, ulcers, and necrosis would appear at the infection site (30). The current results
demonstrated the efficacy of AD-MSCs administration for the control of lesion formation and
footpad necrosis. In addition, the footpad thickness in the AD-MSCs treated group was
significantly less than that the non-treated group on weeks 4 to 7 post-infection,
indicating a decrease in the severity of inflammation. The lower parasite load in the spleen
of mice that received AD-MSCs demonstrated the control of L. major
proliferation at the infected site and its dessemination to other organs.Activation of NO synthase and respiratory burst
terminated to produce NO and reactive oxygen species
(ROS) is among the important mechanisms that
macrophages use to kill Leishmania parasites (31).
Different studies indicated that the amount of NO
production by macrophages and neutrophils was associated
with resistance to leishmaniasis and control of parasite
proliferation (32). The obtained results represented theenhanced production of NO by the lymph node isolated cells in the AD-MSCs treated group.
This increase can be one of the reasons for the lower parasite burden, and slow wound
formation in the footpad of the AD-MSCs treated group compared with the non-treated one.
IL-10 cytokine production is one of the important indicators of failure or victory against
leishmaniasis. Different studies demonstrated that an increase in IL-10 production affected
the anti-leishmania activity of innate immune cells and inhibited Th1 cell development and
IFN-γ production (33, 34). In addition, the persistence of IL-10 at the infected skin causes
the persistence of L. major after clinical cure and reactivation of the
disease (35). In the current study, the significant reduction in IL-10 production in both
the spleen and lymph node of the AD-MSCs treated group demonstrated the efficacy of MSCs in
the treatment of leishmaniasis. TNF-α is another protective cytokine, the importance of
which differs depending on parasite strains (36). However, the ability of TNF-α in the
induction of NO and the increased risk of animal death in the absence of TNF-α reflected its
protective role (37). The ELISA study showed that the level of TNF-α production in the
spleen of the infected mice was higher than that of the lymph node. The local administration
of AD-MSCs can significantly increase the amount of this cytokine in the lymph node. All the
experiences in the study of leishmaniasis in resistant and susceptible mice indicated a key
role in inducing Th1 immune responses in controlling and treating leishmaniasis (38). In
this research, the ADMSCs treatment could induce IFN-γ production of the lymph node at the
infected site through attenuation of IL-10 production. Considering that in the previous
study, MSCs therapy could not have a positive role in the control of leishmaniasis,
different results of the current study indicate the importance of the injection route and
the frequency of injection in the success of cell therapy. Since the present study does not
investigate the mechanism of MSCs’ action in reducing IL-10, it is not possible to discuss
it clearly. However, it seems that multiple injections of MSCs help to generate sequential
waves of pro-inflammatory type I MSCs (15) that terminated to induction of TNF-α, reduction
in IL-10, and control of parasite dissemination. Different studies have shown the efficacy
of multiple MSCs injection in the improvement of the disease.
Conclusion
Multiple intralesional injections of MSCs can induce the formation of protective responses
at the early phase of L. major infection. However, this positive effect was
not long-lasting and ultimately led to parasite dissemination and death of susceptible
infected mice. We need to find a solution that can help to maintain the effectiveness of
stem cells and remove barriers in this way.
Authors: Joyce Carvalho Pereira; Tadeu Diniz Ramos; Johnatas Dutra Silva; Mirian França de Mello; Juliana Elena Silveira Pratti; Alessandra Marcia da Fonseca-Martins; Luan Firmino-Cruz; Jamil Zola Kitoko; Suzana Passos Chaves; Daniel Claudio De Oliveira Gomes; Bruno Lourenço Diaz; Patricia R M Rocco; Herbert Leonel de Matos Guedes Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 7.561