Craig Morgan1, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson2, Stephanie Beards3, Kathryn Hubbard3, Valeria Mondelli4, Marta Di Forti3, Robin M Murray5, Carmine Pariante4, Paola Dazzan4, Thomas J Craig3, Ulrich Reininghaus2, Helen L Fisher2. 1. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London; and Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, UK. 2. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; and Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, UK. 3. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. 4. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK. 5. FRS, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London; and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A growing body of research suggests that childhood adversities are associated with later psychosis, broadly defined. However, there remain several gaps and unanswered questions. Most studies are of low-level psychotic experiences and findings cannot necessarily be extrapolated to psychotic disorders. Further, few studies have examined the effects of more fine-grained dimensions of adversity such as type, timing and severity. AIMS: Using detailed data from the Childhood Adversity and Psychosis (CAPsy) study, we sought to address these gaps and examine in detail associations between a range of childhood adversities and psychotic disorder. METHOD: CAPsy is population-based first-episode psychosis case-control study in the UK. In a sample of 374 cases and 301 controls, we collected extensive data on childhood adversities, in particular household discord, various forms of abuse and bullying, and putative confounders, including family history of psychotic disorder, using validated, semi-structured instruments. RESULTS: We found strong evidence that all forms of childhood adversity were associated with around a two- to fourfold increased odds of psychotic disorder and that exposure to multiple adversities was associated with a linear increase in odds. We further found that severe forms of adversity, i.e. involving threat, hostility and violence, were most strongly associated with increased odds of disorder. More tentatively, we found that some adversities (e.g. bullying, sexual abuse) were more strongly associated with psychotic disorder if first occurrence was in adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings extend previous research on childhood adversity and suggest a degree of specificity for severe adversities involving threat, hostility and violence.
BACKGROUND: A growing body of research suggests that childhood adversities are associated with later psychosis, broadly defined. However, there remain several gaps and unanswered questions. Most studies are of low-level psychotic experiences and findings cannot necessarily be extrapolated to psychotic disorders. Further, few studies have examined the effects of more fine-grained dimensions of adversity such as type, timing and severity. AIMS: Using detailed data from the Childhood Adversity and Psychosis (CAPsy) study, we sought to address these gaps and examine in detail associations between a range of childhood adversities and psychotic disorder. METHOD: CAPsy is population-based first-episode psychosis case-control study in the UK. In a sample of 374 cases and 301 controls, we collected extensive data on childhood adversities, in particular household discord, various forms of abuse and bullying, and putative confounders, including family history of psychotic disorder, using validated, semi-structured instruments. RESULTS: We found strong evidence that all forms of childhood adversity were associated with around a two- to fourfold increased odds of psychotic disorder and that exposure to multiple adversities was associated with a linear increase in odds. We further found that severe forms of adversity, i.e. involving threat, hostility and violence, were most strongly associated with increased odds of disorder. More tentatively, we found that some adversities (e.g. bullying, sexual abuse) were more strongly associated with psychotic disorder if first occurrence was in adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings extend previous research on childhood adversity and suggest a degree of specificity for severe adversities involving threat, hostility and violence.
Authors: J J McGrath; K A McLaughlin; S Saha; S Aguilar-Gaxiola; A Al-Hamzawi; J Alonso; R Bruffaerts; G de Girolamo; P de Jonge; O Esan; S Florescu; O Gureje; J M Haro; C Hu; E G Karam; V Kovess-Masfety; S Lee; J P Lepine; C C W Lim; M E Medina-Mora; Z Mneimneh; B E Pennell; M Piazza; J Posada-Villa; N Sampson; M C Viana; M Xavier; E J Bromet; K S Kendler; R C Kessler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Swaran P Singh; John E Cooper; Helen L Fisher; C Jane Tarrant; Tuhina Lloyd; Jumi Banjo; Sarah Corfe; Peter Jones Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2005-06-22 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Filippo Varese; Feikje Smeets; Marjan Drukker; Ritsaert Lieverse; Tineke Lataster; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; John Read; Jim van Os; Richard P Bentall Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Joanne B Newbury; Louise Arseneault; Terrie E Moffitt; Avshalom Caspi; Andrea Danese; Jessie R Baldwin; Helen L Fisher Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: David M Howard; Oliver Pain; Ryan Arathimos; Miruna C Barbu; Carmen Amador; Rosie M Walker; Bradley Jermy; Mark J Adams; Ian J Deary; David Porteous; Archie Campbell; Patrick F Sullivan; Kathryn L Evans; Louise Arseneault; Naomi R Wray; Michael Meaney; Andrew M McIntosh; Cathryn M Lewis Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Luis Alameda; Axel Levier; Mehdi Gholam-Rezaee; Philippe Golay; Frederik Vandenberghe; Aurélie Delacretaz; Philipp Baumann; Anaïs Glatard; Céline Dubath; Andres Herane-Vives; Victoria Rodriguez; Alessandra Solida; Kim Q Do; Chin B Eap; Philippe Conus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yann Quidé; Leonardo Tozzi; Mark Corcoran; Dara M Cannon; Maria R Dauvermann Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Karlijn S F M Hermans; Inez Myin-Germeys; Charlotte Gayer-Anderson; Matthew J Kempton; Lucia Valmaggia; Philip McGuire; Robin M Murray; Philippa Garety; Til Wykes; Craig Morgan; Zuzana Kasanova; Ulrich Reininghaus Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 7.723