Literature DB >> 32777074

Hunting monolignol transporters: membrane proteomics and biochemical transport assays with membrane vesicles of Norway spruce.

Enni Väisänen1,2, Junko Takahashi1,3, Ogonna Obudulu3,4, Joakim Bygdell5, Pirkko Karhunen6, Olga Blokhina1, Teresa Laitinen2, Teemu H Teeri2, Gunnar Wingsle3, Kurt V Fagerstedt1, Anna Kärkönen2,7.   

Abstract

Both the mechanisms of monolignol transport and the transported form of monolignols in developing xylem of trees are unknown. We tested the hypothesis of an active, plasma membrane-localized transport of monolignol monomers, dimers, and/or glucosidic forms with membrane vesicles prepared from developing xylem and lignin-forming tissue-cultured cells of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), as well as from control materials, comprising non-lignifying Norway spruce phloem and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) BY-2 cells. Xylem and BY-2 vesicles transported both coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside, but inhibitor assays suggested that this transport was through the tonoplast. Membrane vesicles prepared from lignin-forming spruce cells showed coniferin transport, but the Km value for coniferin was much higher than those of xylem and BY-2 cells. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of membrane proteins isolated from spruce developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells revealed multiple transporters. These were compared with a transporter gene set obtained by a correlation analysis with a selected set of spruce monolignol biosynthesis genes. Biochemical membrane vesicle assays showed no support for ABC-transporter-mediated monolignol transport but point to a role for secondary active transporters (such as MFS or MATE transporters). In contrast, proteomic and co-expression analyses suggested a role for ABC transporters and MFS transporters.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lignin biosynthesis; monolignol transport; plasma membrane; proteomics; transporter proteins

Year:  2020        PMID: 32777074      PMCID: PMC7586744          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


Introduction

Lignification of plant cell walls is a developmental process in water-transporting xylem cells and support-giving sclerenchyma cells. In addition, it can be an induced as a protective response against stresses. In lignification, hydroxycinnamic alcohols (monolignols) form a polymer in the cell wall. The biosynthetic process of lignification includes the production of monolignols through the monolignol biosynthetic pathway, a branch of the phenylpropanoid pathway. Next, monolignols are secreted into the cell wall, oxidized to radicals, and the radicals are polymerized into lignin, a complex network of linkages between monolignols (Perkins ). The process is mediated by a wide variety of enzymes in multiple locations. The plasma membrane (PM) serves the plant cell as a controlling boundary between the cell wall and the cytoplasm. This boundary has many roles, including maintaining cellular ionic homeostasis, creating concentration gradients, and thus regulating biochemical reactions, and detecting and mediating signals between the apoplast and the symplast. In addition, the PM is important for cell wall biosynthesis because cellulose is produced directly at the PM. The biosynthesis of lignin is separated in space: monolignol biosynthesis takes place in the cytoplasm and lignin polymerization occurs in the cell wall. Thus, monolignols require transportation through the PM to the site of polymerization. According to biochemical data, transport of monolignols through the PM involves enzymatic transporters (Miao and Liu, 2010; Alejandro ). Still, passive diffusion has a likely role in aglycone transport (Boija and Johansson, 2006; Vermaas ), whereas Golgi-mediated transport does not seem probable (Kaneda ). The transport mechanism of monolignols has remained as a mystery (Perkins ). Even the transported form is not yet known. The most favored candidates, monolignol glucosides (such as coniferyl alcohol glucoside, or coniferin), are non-toxic, non-reactive, and readily detectable molecules in the developing secondary xylem of many gymnosperms (Morikawa ; Terashima ) and some angiosperms (e.g. Magnolia; Tsuji ). Coniferin β-glucosidases, which have been detected in, for example, developing xylem of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta; Dharmawardhana ), cleave the sugar moiety, leaving the free alcohol form ready to react with peroxidases/laccases and the growing lignin polymer. Results using coniferyl alcohol and coniferin in assays with membrane vesicles prepared from aerial tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana (Miao and Liu, 2010) suggest a role for PM-located ABC transporter(s) in coniferyl alcohol transport. In addition, Alejandro proposed that a G-type ABC transporter, AtABCG29, functions in p-coumaryl alcohol transport at the PM in Arabidopsis root endodermis and in vascular tissues. In contrast, several tree species show H+-antiporter-dependent transport of coniferin through the tonoplast and endomembranes (Tsuyama ). Recently, p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside was shown to be transported via the same mechanism in hybrid poplar (Populus sieboldii × P. grandidentata) and Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa), supporting the role of vesicular transport in monolignol transport (Tsuyama ). In addition, transport of dilignols seems possible. The presence of conjugates of sinapyl alcohol and p-coumaric acid in grass lignin suggests that there is a system that transports dimers into the apoplast, since a transferase making these conjugates exists in the cytoplasm (Hatfield et al., 2008, 2009). It seems possible that the first step of polymerization, dimerization, occurs partly in the cytosol, and the dimer is transported to the cell wall and incorporated into the growing polymer. In the current study, membrane proteomic analysis of developing xylem with active lignification and lignin-forming tissue-cultured cells (Kärkönen ) of Norway spruce (Picea abies) was conducted. As a comparison, the membrane proteome of developing phloem, which does not lignify (except stone cells), was investigated. Microsomal vesicles (microsomal fraction; MF) are a heterogeneous mixture of cellular membranes. Partially enriched PM vesicles (upper phase fraction; UP) (Kärkönen ) were prepared from MF material and their proteomes were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). To take a closer look at membrane-localized, putatively lignification-related proteins, protein identifications were compared with several published gene expression studies (Nystedt ; Jokipii-Lukkari ; Laitinen ; Blokhina ), and candidates for monolignol transport and other lignification-related processes were identified. Biochemical monolignol transport assays with multiple candidate transport forms showed that MF prepared from developing xylem, but not those from developing phloem, had a H+-gradient-dependent, secondary active, tonoplast-localized transport of coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside. A strikingly similar, active tonoplast-localized coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside transport was detected in MF prepared from non-lignifying control material, consisting of tissue-cultured Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). This observation questions whether this transporter is dedicated to lignin biosynthesis. In addition, MF isolated from the lignin-forming cultured cells had a transporter able to transport coniferin, but its affinity for coniferin was much lower than those in xylem or BY-2 cells. In combination with the proteomic data, correlation analyses using existing Norway spruce RNA-seq data were utilized to identify candidate monolignol transporters.

Materials and methods

Plant material

In each of the years 2011, 2013, and 2014, an approximately 40-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst., clone E8504) tree, grown in Ruotsinkylä, southern Finland, was felled in late June, when xylem lignification was actively going on. Developing xylem and phloem were collected as described in Väisänen . A Norway spruce callus culture (line A3/85) that forms extracellular lignin (Simola ) was maintained on a solid medium according to Kärkönen . Cells were transferred into a liquid medium (Simola and Santanen, 1990) ~2.5 weeks after subculturing. The cells were cultivated in the liquid culture for ~5 days, then collected, washed with water, and stored at –80°C (Kärkönen ). Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells (Nagata ) were cultured in a modified Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium, pH 5.8, supplemented with 0.9 μM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 3 % (w/v) sucrose, 3 μM thiamine HCl, and 2.7 mM KH2PO4. The cells were grown in the dark, in 50 ml aliquots in 300 ml Erlenmeyer flasks on a rotary shaker (100 rpm) at 25 °C, and subcultured weekly. Seven days after subculturing, the cells were collected, washed, and stored at –80°C.

Membrane preparations

Spruce xylem and phloem, lignin-forming cultured cells, and BY-2 cells were ground as described in Väisänen . Out of the ground material, microsomal vesicles (MF) were prepared. Aqueous polymer two-phase partitioning (Larsson ) as optimized for developing spruce xylem and cultured cells (Väisänen ) was used to prepare enriched PM vesicles (UP). MF was prepared from the BY-2 cells using the same procedure as for xylem. Membrane fractions from each material were stored at –80 °C in storage buffer [10 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.5, 0.33 M sucrose and 1 mM dl-dithiothreitol (DTT)] until use. For proteomic analyses, the UP and MF fractions of spruce xylem, phloem, and tissue-cultured cells were washed with washing buffer [10 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.01% (w/v) Triton X-100] to reduce the amount of soluble proteins entrapped inside the membrane vesicles or weakly attached to the membranes. Each membrane sample was mixed with the washing buffer, incubated on ice for 30 min, and pelleted at 110 000 g for 45 min at 4 °C. The washed membrane pellet was resuspended in storage buffer, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C. For determination of protein amounts, the membrane samples were diluted with storage buffer supplemented with 0.01% (w/v) Triton X-100. Proteins were measured with a Bio-Rad protein assay (based on Bradford, 1976) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.

Substrates tested in the transport assays

Coniferyl alcohol, p-coumaryl alcohol, p-coumaryl alcohol 4-O-glucoside, pinoresinol, pinoresinol diglucoside, lariciresinol, and isolariciresinol of analytical grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. β-O-4 erol was a kind gift from Prof. Jussi Sipilä and Dr Paula Nousiainen (Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland). The synthesis of 14C-coniferin is described in Supplementary Protocol S1 at JXB online. Pinoresinol monoglucoside was prepared from pinoresinol diglucoside by enzymatic digestion with β-glucosidase (from almonds, Sigma; 0.72 U mg–1 pinoresinol diglucoside) in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 5.0, at 37 °C for 1 h. A preparative thin layer chromatography was run with acetone:ethylacetate:water (10:10:1), the spot between pinoresinol and pinoresinol diglucoside was scraped off, and the compound was extracted twice with 100% methanol and once with water. The identity of the compound as pinoresinol monoglucoside was confirmed by HPLC. 14C-coniferyl alcohol was prepared from 14C-coniferin by overnight enzymatic digestion at 36 °C immediately before each transport experiment. The reaction contained 170 kBq ml−1 14C-coniferin, 0.5 U ml−1 β-glucosidase (from almonds, Sigma), 50 mM Na acetate buffer, pH 5.0, and 0.9 mM non-radioactive coniferyl alcohol (added to the reaction as a protectant). A thin layer chromatography run followed by phosphoimaging analysis suggested that the reaction was complete. The final concentration of coniferyl alcohol (labelled+non-labelled) after hydrolysis was 5.7 mM. The chemical structures of the substrates are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Chemical structures of compounds tested for transport.

Chemical structures of compounds tested for transport.

Transport assays

To study the membrane transport system(s) and the monolignol transport form(s), a vesicle assay was set up. Non-washed MF (10–200 µg, based on protein amount) were incubated at 25 °C in 100–200 µl of reaction buffer (50 mM MOPS-KOH, pH 7.5, 0.33 M sucrose, and 0.01% BSA) with 100 µM of substrate (14C-coniferin, 14C-coniferyl alcohol, non-labeled p-coumaryl alcohol, p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside, or the dimers pinoresinol, pinoresinol monoglucoside, lariciresinol, isolariciresinol, or β-O-4 erol) and with or without the addition of 5 mM Mg ATP, or 5 mM Na ATP supplemented with 8 mM MgCl2. The reaction was started with the addition of ATP (inhibitor experiments) or vesicles (all other experiments). The inhibitors used were 1 mM vanadate (Sigma-Aldrich; activated as described in Gordon, 1991), 50 µM gramicidin (Sigma-Aldrich; a mixture of gramicidins A, B, C, and D), 20 µM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) (Sigma-Aldrich), or 1 µM bafilomycin A1 (Sigma-Aldrich) in DMSO. Control reactions contained an equal volume of DMSO. In addition, boiled (for 5 min) membranes were assayed to ensure that active transport occurred and the data obtained were not due to entrapment of the phenolic substrate on the surface of the vesicles. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 400–800 µl ice-cold reaction buffer and then gently mixed. Vesicles were pelleted by centrifugation at 17 000 g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was removed. In the case of 14C-substrates, the pellet was suspended in 180 µl water, mixed with 3 ml scintillation liquid (Hisafe 3, Perkin Elmer), and the radioactivity was counted for 5 min in a liquid scintillation counter (Wallac 1415, LSC, Wallac Oy, Turku). The accumulation of coniferin (%) in the vesicles was calculated by dividing the radioactivity of the pellet by the total radioactivity in the reaction and multiplying by 100. In the case of non-radioactive substrates, the pellet was extracted twice for 15 min with 300 µl of 67% methanol supplemented with fluorocinnamic acid as an inner standard by vortexing and sonicating at room temperature. The membranes were pelleted by centrifugation at 19 000 g for 10 min at room temperature, after which the supernatant was dried. The sample was dissolved in 60 µl of 100% methanol, and injected for HPLC (Agilent 100 Series; column: ZORBAX RX-C18, 5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm; G1315B DAD detector), or UPLC (Acquity Ultra Performance LC; column: HSS T3, 1.8 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm; PDA eλ detector). The peak areas of the compounds studied and of the inner standard were integrated and used to quantify the compounds.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was conducted at least three times with different MF preparations, with a similar trend in results. Kruskal–Wallis or one-way ANOVA tests followed by post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction were performed for coniferin transport results with multiple inhibitors or alternative substrates within one experiment to test the significance of inhibition. Owing to occasional variation in the detection level, both the statistical testing and the representation of results were done from either representative experiments or from data combined from several experiments. A one-tailed Student’s t-test was used for pairwise comparison of coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside cross-inhibition. Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed in SPSS (IBM) and t-tests in Excel (Microsoft).

Sample preparation for proteomic analyses

Sodium deoxycholate (SDC) was used to solubilize membrane proteins from washed UP and MF fractions of the spruce materials (developing xylem, phloem, and cultured cells). All materials had three biological replicates except phloem UP, which had two biological replicates. As the UP samples had more PM protein identifications than the MF samples (see Supplementary Table S1A), the UP samples were additionally solubilized with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to increase the number of identifications. Protein solubilizations were done in 25 mM TrisHCl, pH 6.8, supplemented with 25 mM DTT and Complete protease inhibitors (Roche) by adding the detergent dropwise to samples to a 4% final concentration and then incubating the samples at 60 °C for 30 min. The buffer for SDS solubilization was supplemented with 5% glycerol and 0.02% bromophenol blue. The remaining membranes were pelleted by centrifugation at 17 000 g for 30 min at room temperature, and the supernatant was collected. The SDS-treated samples were allowed to enter the top part of a polyacrylamide gel in electrophoresis (PAGE), the gel was stained with PageBlue (Bio-Rad), and the area containing proteins was cut out. The gel was destained during the clean-up step using the C18 STAGE-tip (made as described in Obudulu ). In the case of SDC-solubilized samples, no PAGE step was done as SDC is compatible with trypsin digestion and MS (Masuda ). Proteins were digested with trypsin according to a published procedure (Masuda ), followed by a post-digestion clean-up on an Oasis HLB µElution plate (Waters, MA, USA). The eluates were diluted 50-fold to decrease the organic content to ~1% before MS analysis.

LC-MS/MS analysis

A 1 ng aliquot of each sample was loaded on a BEH C18 analytical column (75 μm internal diameter × 250 mm, 1.7 μm particles; Waters, MA, USA), and separated using a concave 180 min gradient of 1–40% solvent B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) in solvent A (0.1% aqueous formic acid) at a flow rate of 368 nl min–1. The eluate was passed to a nano-electrospray ionization-equipped SynaptTM G2-Si HDMS mass spectrometer (Waters, MA, USA) operating in a resolution mode. All data were collected using ion-mobility-MSE with dynamic range extension enabled using a scan time of 0.4 s, mass-corrected using Glu-fibrinopeptide B and Leu-enkephalin as reference peptides.

Data processing

The data were processed with Protein Lynx Global Server v.3.0.3 (Waters, MA, USA), and the resulting spectra were searched against the Picea abies 1.0 database [ConGenIE (http://congenie.org/); Sundell ]. The database search settings were: enzyme-specific cleavage with one miscleavage allowed; carbamidomethylated cysteines as fixed modification; oxidized methionine, N-terminal acetylation, and deamidated asparagine and glutamine as variable modifications. A minimum of three fragments were required for a peptide detection with a precursor and fragment tolerance of 10 and 25 ppm, respectively, with a false discovery rate <5%.

MS data analysis

In the case of UP samples, results from SDS- and SDC-solubilized samples were combined. In the case of MF samples, results from a run with SDC-solubilized samples were used. A protein was identified in the sample if at least one unique peptide was detected, and in the membrane preparation if a protein was found in at least two out of three biological replicates. Sometimes the MS peak was also visible for the third replicate but identification by MS/MS could not be done. In addition to qualitative data, the MSE mode used produced quantitative data. Final lists of proteins were compared with each other and with gene expression correlation results by using Venny 2.1 (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/). About 30% of Norway spruce genes are fragmented, and the confidence level (http://congenie.org/; Nystedt ) is marked in the results presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Correlation analysis of pre-existing gene expression data

Data from pre-existing gene expression studies in Norway spruce were used to search for suitable monolignol transporter candidates. The datasets were: (i) ConGenIE (http://congenie.org/;Nystedt ), 22 libraries from different organs and different time points of the whole aerial part of a tree; (ii) Norwood (Jokipii-Lukkari ), 51 libraries of thin layers cut from phloem and cambium over the developing xylem into the mature xylem; (iii) Ray-tracheid comparison (Blokhina ), nine libraries comprising developing ray parenchymal cells and tracheids separately, and whole sections of developing xylem; (iv) Tissue culture (Laitinen ), 18 libraries of lignin-forming cultured cells under lignin-forming and non-lignin-forming conditions. In a recent study, gene expression in xylem throughout the year was examined and a highly correlating set of 12 monolignol biosynthesis genes with a peak of expression during xylem development was identified (Jokipii-Lukkari ). These genes were used here as baits (denoted hereafter as bait genes; Table 1). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used (in Excel) to search for genes whose expression correlated with that of any of the 12 bait genes with a coefficient >0.8. Each of the four datasets was studied separately. A similar correlation analysis was done using ABC and MFS transporters detected in the proteomic analysis, to gain data on possible co-expression of the transporters with other lignification-related genes. Genes whose expression correlated with that of a selected transporter with a correlation coefficient >0.8 in at least two out of four datasets were selected to represent correlation.
Table 1.

K m values determined for coniferin transport in microsomal fractions prepared from developing xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce, and BY-2 cells of tobacco

K m (µM)a
MeanSD
Norway spruce xylem127.421.4
Norway spruce cultured cells463.1297.0
BY-2 cells 39.00.08

The Lineweaver–Burk equation (Lineweaver and Burk, 1934) was used to calculate Km.

K m values determined for coniferin transport in microsomal fractions prepared from developing xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce, and BY-2 cells of tobacco The Lineweaver–Burk equation (Lineweaver and Burk, 1934) was used to calculate Km.

Results

Transport of monolignol glucosides

MF were prepared from developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce, and from tobacco BY-2 cells, to test the hypothesis that there are PM-localized, active transporters for monolignol transport. MF were used in the transport assays instead of PM-enriched fraction (UP) for the following reasons. (i) The preparation of MF is much faster than PM enrichment by aqueous polymer two-phase partitioning; consequently, the enzyme activity is better maintained during isolation of the membranes. In both the MF and the PM-enriched fractions of Norway spruce, PM and tonoplast vesicles are present (Kärkönen ; Väisänen ). Additional methods, such as sucrose gradient centrifugation, would be needed for the preparation of pure PM fractions, extending the isolation time further. (ii) Generally, MF contains both inside-out and right-side-out vesicles of PM, whereas PM-enriched fractions prepared by aqueous polymer two-phase partitioning contain mainly right-side-out vesicles (Larsson ), and a method for turning the vesicles inside out would be necessary, and would extend the preparation time for the vesicles. Inside-out vesicles are needed because the method investigates the uptake of substrates into the vesicles. (iii) Isolating PM from conifers such as Norway spruce is much more demanding than from angiosperm species (Kärkönen ; Väisänen ). The yields of PM-enriched fractions are low and would allow only a limited number of transport assays. (iv) Although MF contains all cellular membranes, the results with transporter assays were similar to those with enriched PM vesicles (data not shown). An ATP-dependent accumulation of 14C-coniferin with saturation kinetics was observed in MF prepared from spruce xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells, and in MF prepared from tobacco BY-2 cells (Fig. 2A). However, no transport was observed in vesicles prepared from spruce phloem (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.

(A) Time course of ATP-dependent 14C-coniferin uptake to microsomal vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing xylem, lignin-forming cultured cells, and tobacco BY-2 cells. The background with no ATP addition was subtracted. (B) 14C-coniferin uptake to microsomal vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing phloem at 0 °C (on ice), and at 25 °C without and with ATP supplementation; time interval 10 min. Data presented are means ±SD, n=3.

(A) Time course of ATP-dependent 14C-coniferin uptake to microsomal vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing xylem, lignin-forming cultured cells, and tobacco BY-2 cells. The background with no ATP addition was subtracted. (B) 14C-coniferin uptake to microsomal vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing phloem at 0 °C (on ice), and at 25 °C without and with ATP supplementation; time interval 10 min. Data presented are means ±SD, n=3. Next, we tested whether the accumulation of 14C-coniferin in spruce xylem and tobacco BY-2 cell MF preparations was inhibited by chemicals that are known to inhibit membrane transport (Fig. 3). With ion uncouplers, it is possible to inhibit a secondary active transport where a transporter is using an ion gradient (in plants, a H+ gradient) to energize the transport of its substrate across the membrane. Gramicidin creates an ion channel for monovalent cations (Hladky and Haydon, 1972), while the weak acid CCCP transports H+ across the membrane (McLaughlin and Dilger, 1980). To inhibit transport more directly, we also used vanadate and bafilomycin A1. Vanadate inhibits ABC transporters (Urbatsch ) as well as the PM H+-ATPase (Gallagher and Leonard, 1982), whereas bafilomycin A1 inhibits V-type H+-ATPase present in the tonoplast (Dröse and Altendorf, 1997). Both gramicidin and CCCP significantly reduced 14C-coniferin transport in MF prepared from BY-2 cells (Fig. 3). In developing xylem, transport was significantly inhibited by CCCP and bafilomycin A1 (Fig. 3). With bafilomycin A1 in BY-2 cells and gramicidin in xylem, a trend towards inhibition was evident, which further indicates a role for a vacuolar coniferin/H+ antiporter.
Fig. 3.

Inhibitor profile of 14C-coniferin transport in microsomal vesicles (MF) prepared from (A) Norway spruce developing xylem and (B) tobacco BY-2 cells. +/– 5 mM ATP, +/– 1 mM vanadate (van), +/– 50 µM gramicidin (gram), +/– 20 µM CCCP, and +/– 1 µM bafilomycin A1 (BAF) were used in 10 min reactions. In MF of xylem, transport was significantly inhibited by CCCP (P=0.002) and bafilomycin A1 (P=0.002) [Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction (H=26.7, P<0.000; combination of three experiments, n=6–9)]. In MF of BY-2 cells, transport was significantly inhibited by gramicidin (P=0.014) and CCCP (P=0.002) [Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction (H=24.9, P<0.000; combination of three experiments, n=6–12)].

Inhibitor profile of 14C-coniferin transport in microsomal vesicles (MF) prepared from (A) Norway spruce developing xylem and (B) tobacco BY-2 cells. +/– 5 mM ATP, +/– 1 mM vanadate (van), +/– 50 µM gramicidin (gram), +/– 20 µM CCCP, and +/– 1 µM bafilomycin A1 (BAF) were used in 10 min reactions. In MF of xylem, transport was significantly inhibited by CCCP (P=0.002) and bafilomycin A1 (P=0.002) [Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction (H=26.7, P<0.000; combination of three experiments, n=6–9)]. In MF of BY-2 cells, transport was significantly inhibited by gramicidin (P=0.014) and CCCP (P=0.002) [Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction (H=24.9, P<0.000; combination of three experiments, n=6–12)]. Of all material tested, the transporter in BY-2 vesicles had the highest affinity for coniferin, with a Km value of 39.0 µM (Table 1). The Km value for coniferin in xylem was three times higher (127.4±21.4 µM), whereas that in spruce cultured cells was the highest (463.1 ±297.0 µM). Similarly, ATP-dependent p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside transport was observed in MF prepared from developing spruce xylem and tobacco BY-2 cells (Fig. 4A). The inhibition of coniferin transport with an equal concentration of p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside, and similar inhibition of p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside transport with an equal concentration of coniferin, suggests that the same transporter is transporting these compounds (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. S1). Coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside were the only detected substrates for the transport (Table 2) in developing xylem and BY-2 cells, although pinoresinol was able to inhibit coniferin transport in developing xylem (Supplementary Fig. S1). Other phenolics did not have a statistically significant inhibitory effect on coniferin transport. Coniferin transport in vesicles of developing xylem (mean ±SD 1.45±0.05) was inhibited by the addition of p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside (1.08±0.03, P=0.000), pinoresinol (1.18±0.06, P=0.000), and coniferin (0.93±0.02, P=0.000), as revealed by one-way ANOVA [F(7, 16)=38.47, P=0.000] followed by Bonferroni post-hoc tests (Supplementary Fig. S1). Coniferin transport in BY-2 vesicles was significantly inhibited by p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside and coniferin (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Fig. 4.

Inhibition of ATP-dependent uptake of (A) p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside (PCAg) and (B) 14C-coniferin (conif) to microsomal vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing xylem (black bars) and tobacco BY-2 cells (white bars). Inhibition was achieved with equal concentrations (100 µM) of substrates in the reaction mixture. Data presented are means ±SD, n = 3. Asterisks indicate statistically significant transport inhibition (P<0.05; one-tailed Student’s t-test).

Table 2.

Transport of compounds investigated in microsomal vesicles (MF) prepared from developing xylem of Norway spruce

–ATP+ATPTechnical replicates
MeanSDMeanSD
Coniferyl alcohol10018.199.020.02
Coniferin1000.9 214.1 10.22
p-Coumaryl alcohol1004.194.616.23
p-Coumaryl alcohol glucoside10031.6 342.2 69.53
Pinoresinol1001.093.02.13
Pinoresinol glucoside1007.574.15.83
Lariciresinol1009.894.66.53
Isolariciresinol1002.888.11.83
β-O-4 erol1002.1107.510.03

Experiments for each compound were conducted at least twice with a similar trend in results. A representative experiment with the indicated number of technical replicates is shown. As the aim was to resolve whether there was ATP-dependent accumulation of these substrates in MF, and not to compare the accumulation of different substrates with each other, the results are shown relative (%) to the background samples with no ATP supplementation.

Transport of compounds investigated in microsomal vesicles (MF) prepared from developing xylem of Norway spruce Experiments for each compound were conducted at least twice with a similar trend in results. A representative experiment with the indicated number of technical replicates is shown. As the aim was to resolve whether there was ATP-dependent accumulation of these substrates in MF, and not to compare the accumulation of different substrates with each other, the results are shown relative (%) to the background samples with no ATP supplementation. Inhibition of ATP-dependent uptake of (A) p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside (PCAg) and (B) 14C-coniferin (conif) to microsomal vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing xylem (black bars) and tobacco BY-2 cells (white bars). Inhibition was achieved with equal concentrations (100 µM) of substrates in the reaction mixture. Data presented are means ±SD, n = 3. Asterisks indicate statistically significant transport inhibition (P<0.05; one-tailed Student’s t-test). No ATP-dependent 14C-coniferyl alcohol transport was observed in any of the tested materials (Table 2 and data not shown). These results negate the primary hypothesis that the transported form of monolignol is coniferyl alcohol in developing xylem, similar to that in Arabidopsis leaves (Miao and Liu, 2010). Variations of the reaction mixture [additional salt supplementation (KCl, MgSO4, CaCl2, or NaCl), xylem harvesting time (early June or late June), different concentrations of coniferyl alcohol, or the use of enriched plasma membranes (UP fraction) instead of MF] did not change this conclusion (data not shown). No active transport of p-coumaryl alcohol or the tested dimers pinoresinol, pinoresinol monoglucoside, lariciresinol, isolariciresinol, and β-O-4 erol was detected in xylem MF (Table 2).

Spruce membrane proteome

The membrane proteomes of developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce (three replicates of each) were analyzed to identify candidates for monolignol transport. SDC solubilization of MF and UP proteins led to the identification of 522 and 496 proteins in xylem UP and MF, respectively (Supplementary Table S1A). Specifically, 195 proteins were present only in the UP fraction and 169 were present only in the MF. The proteins specific for the UP fractions (Supplementary Fig. S2A) had, among others, a lot of PM and tonoplast protein identifications, whereas proteins present only in the MF (Supplementary Fig. S2B) were largely of mitochondrial origin. Thus, xylem UP fractions were selected to be analyzed in more detail and were additionally solubilized with SDS to enable more identifications. The protein detections of the SDC- and SDS-solubilized UP fractions and SDC-solubilized MF fractions are shown in Supplementary Table S1B, and their peptides are shown in in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. Altogether, 761 proteins were detected in the UP samples, of which 619 were detected in xylem, 278 in phloem, and 164 in the lignin-forming cultured cells (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S1B). A REVIGO treemap of proteins in xylem UP showed multiple biological functions, out of which the most obvious was “transport processes” (Supplementary Fig. S3A). The functions “response to different signals” and “involvement of metabolism and biosynthesis” were also abundant. Among phloem UP proteins, “responses to different signals” and “metabolic processes”, especially “carbohydrate metabolism”, were evident, as was “transport” (Supplementary Fig. S3B). The UP fraction of the lignin-forming cultured cells showed functions in similar biological processes, but “transport” was poorly represented (Supplementary Fig. S3C).
Fig. 5.

Venn diagram representing protein identifications in the SDC- and SDS-solubilized enriched plasma membrane fractions of Norway spruce developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells. The number of transporters is given in parentheses.

Venn diagram representing protein identifications in the SDC- and SDS-solubilized enriched plasma membrane fractions of Norway spruce developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells. The number of transporters is given in parentheses. Of all proteins identified in the materials analyzed, 95 were transporters (channels, secondary and primary active transporters, and carriers), of which 85 were present in xylem, 35 in phloem, and 22 in the lignin-forming cultured cells (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S1B). There were 13 transporters common to all the tissues studied. Among these were one ABC transporter, several ATPases/synthases and other proteins for H+ translocation, one aquaporin, one ATP/ADP carrier, and one Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. Four transporters were shared between the two lignin-producing materials (i.e. developing xylem and cultured spruce cells): two H+-ATPases, a Ca2+-ATPase, and a phosphate transporter. Fifty-one transporters were detected solely in the xylem samples. Of these, 15 were ABC transporters and three were major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters. The rest of the transporters were involved in H+ translocation, water and ion movement, and other transport processes. Xylem and phloem shared 17 transporters that were not detected in the tissue-cultured cells. These comprised four ABC transporters, two ATP synthases, four H+ pumps, three ion channels, three aquaporins, and one homolog of Arabidopsis Walls Are Thin 1 (WAT1, an auxin transporter; Ranocha ). Five transporters were found solely in the cultured cells: an ABC transporter, a MFS transporter, two ion channels, and a xanthine/uracil permease family protein. Five transporters were present in phloem only, comprising three aquaporins, one Ca2+-ATPase, and one ion channel (Supplementary Table S1B). No multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) transporters were present in any of the materials. However, a single UP sample obtained from the lignin-forming cultured cells showed two unique peptides with MATE transporter annotation (MA_9267g0020).

Genes correlating with bait monolignol biosynthesis genes

The expression patterns of genes belonging to the same developmental trait can correlate, and strong gene co-expression has been detected between a transporter and the biosynthesis genes of its substrate (Darbani ). Thus, we conducted a correlation analysis between selected monolignol biosynthesis genes and published gene expression datasets for Norway spruce. All-year-around gene expression data of developing spruce xylem (Jokipii-Lukkari ) showed a clear correlation of 12 monolignol biosynthesis genes covering all the enzymatic reactions in the pathways leading to monolignols (Table 3), with maximum expression in the summer months during active xylem development. The correlation of these monolignol biosynthesis genes (hereafter termed “bait genes”) in the published datasets was examined, and they were noticed to correlate positively with each other in all datasets (Supplementary Table S1C). Next, the expression of other genes in relation to the bait genes was analyzed. In the datasets analyzed, ~5% of the genes correlated with the baits with a correlation coefficient of >0.8. Altogether, 8494 genes had a correlation coefficient >0.8 with the bait genes in at least one of the datasets (Supplementary Table S1B), of which 765 were present in the Norwood data (Jokipii-Lukkari ), 3630 in the tissue culture data (Laitinen ), 3236 in the ray-tracheid data (Blokhina ), and 2587 in the ConGenIE data (Nystedt ). The gene lists showed some overlap (Fig. 6).
Table 3.

Genes correlating positively (>0.8) with the bait genes in all four datasets studied, and their presence in the membrane proteomic data of developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming tissue-cultured cells of Norway spruce

Gene accessionAnnotationClosest Arabidopsis homologPresence in the proteomics data
Xylem UPPhloem UPCultured cells UPXylem MFPhloem MFCultured cells MF
Monolignol biosynthesis and assisting reactions
MA_10432099g0010Caffeic acid O-methyltransferase *AT5G54160.1XX
MA_106573g0010Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase*AT5G48930.1
MA_109548g0010 p-Coumarate 3-hydroxylase *AT2G40890.1XX
MA_123220g0010Phenylalanine ammonia lyase *AT3G53260.1XX
MA_130482g0010Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase *AT2G30490.1XX
MA_202753g0010Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase AT2G30490.1X
MA_362678g0010Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase *AT4G34050.1
MA_52972g0010Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase *AT3G19450.1
MA_56692g00104-Coumarate: CoA ligase *AT3G21240.1
MA_667858g0010Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase AT4G34050.1X
MA_6931g0010Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase *AT4G34050.1X
MA_9446650g0010Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase *AT1G15950.1
(MA_118702g0010) (Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase *) AT2G30490.1 X X X
(MA_87599g0010) (Caffeoyl shikimate esterase *) AT1G52760.1
Shikimate pathway
MA_10428955g0020Chorismate synthase 2AT1G48850.1
MA_10436001g0020Phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase 1AT1G22410.1XX
MA_107600g00103-Dehydroquinate synthase AT5G66120.2
MA_43667g0010Arogenate dehydratase/prephenate dehydratase 6 AT1G08250.1
MA_4908g00103-Dehydroquinate synthase AT5G66120.2
MA_76465g00103-Phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferaseAT2G45300.1
MA_8419g0010Aspartate aminotransferase AT2G22250.2
MA_8918g0010Chorismate synthaseAT1G48850.1
Redox enzymes
MA_125690g0020Flavoprotein WrbAAT4G27270.1X
MA_21175g0010Cytochrome b5 isoform B AT2G32720.1XXXX
MA_76916g0010Thioredoxin superfamily proteinAT5G38900.1
MA_8687g0010NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 1 AT5G17770.1XXX
Transport
MA_1461g0010Putative cadmium/zinc-transporting ATPase HMA4 AT4G30110.1
MA_18076g0010Amino acid permease 3 AT1G77380.1
MA_198319g0010H+-ATPase interacting proteinAT4G27500.1
MA_84518g0010Copper-transporting ATPase RAN1 AT5G44790.1
Kinases
MA_118589g0010Probable receptor-like protein kinaseAT3G59110.1X
MA_121123g0010Proline-rich receptor-like protein kinase PERK1 AT1G77280.1
MA_255g0010Adenosine kinase 2 AT5G03300.1XXX
Transcription factors
MA_10434782g0020LOB domain-containing protein 6/AS2AT1G65620.1 (AS2)
MA_33964g0010Protein ODORANT1/MYB AT5G16600.1 (MYB43)
Cell wall polysaccharide synthesis or modification, and sugar metabolism
MA_10425819g0010Beta-glucosidase 42 AT5G36890.1
MA_10427170g0020Sucrose synthase 4 AT4G02280.1XX
MA_10429529g0010Probable glucuronoxylan glucuronosyltransferase IRX7AT2G28110.1
MA_10433350g0010Glycosyltransferase family protein (DUF23)AT2G33570.1
MA_246547g0010Callose synthase 3 AT5G13000.1
MA_71720g0010Mannan endo-1,4-β-mannosidase 2 AT2G20680.1
MA_10433720g0010DUF246 domain-containing proteinAT1G62330.1
Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism (other than aromatic amino acids)
MA_10090g00105-Methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine methyltransferase AT5G17920.1XXXXX
MA_10427606g00105-Methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine methyltransferase AT5G17920.1XX
MA_10430803g00104,5-DOPA dioxygenase extradiol-like protein AT4G15093.1
MA_10435905g0030D-3-Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase AT4G34200.1
MA_11357g0010Serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1 AT4G13930.1XXXX
MA_17826g0020Phosphoserine aminotransferaseAT4G35630.1
Lipid synthesis and modification
MA_177103g0010Sec14p-like phosphatidylinositol transfer family proteinAT3G24840.1
MA_803706g0010Acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 4 AT3G05420.2
Microtubule-associated
MA_10436304g0020TPX2 (targeting protein for Xklp2) protein familyAT2G35880.1
MA_7104g0010GPI-anchored adhesin-like protein, putative (DUF936)AT1G08760.1
Metabolism
MA_101067g0010Fructose-bisphosphate aldolaseAT3G52930.1XXXXX
MA_10431598g0010ATP-citrate synthase alpha chain protein 3 AT1G09430.1
MA_11783g0010Probable glycine cleavage system H protein 2AT2G35120.1
MA_197296g0010 S-adenosylmethionine synthase 3 AT3G17390.1XXXX
MA_736502g0010Pyrophosphate-fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase subunit alpha AT1G76550.1
MA_81112g0010Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 1 AT2G44160.1XX
MA_9153293g0010Alcohol dehydrogenase class-3 AT5G43940.2
Other
MA_10429738g0010Maternal effect embryo arrest 59AT4G37300.1
MA_138523g0010Chaperone protein DnaJ AT2G22360.1
MA_23219g0010Cell number regulator 8 AT2G37110.1
MA_70960g0010AAR2 protein familyAT1G66510.1
MA_87543g0010Uncharacterized protein C4orf29 homolog AT3G12150.1
MA_9061045g0010NA

Twelve monolignol biosynthesis genes (Jokipii-Lukkari ) that were used as bait genes in a correlation study are marked with asterisks. Two bait genes (Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, MA_118702g0010; Caffeoyl shikimate esterase, MA_87599g0010; indicated in parentheses) had positive correlations with the other baits, but the value did not exceed 0.8 in all datasets. UP, Enriched plasma membrane vesicles; MF, microsomal vesicles; NA, no annotation.

Fig. 6.

Venn diagram representing genes whose expression correlated with the bait genes in four different datasets: Tissue culture (Laitinen ), ConGenIE (Nystedt ), Norwood (Jokipii-Lukkari ), and Ray-tracheid (Blokhina ). The number of ABC, MATE, and MFS transporters is given in parentheses.

Genes correlating positively (>0.8) with the bait genes in all four datasets studied, and their presence in the membrane proteomic data of developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming tissue-cultured cells of Norway spruce Twelve monolignol biosynthesis genes (Jokipii-Lukkari ) that were used as bait genes in a correlation study are marked with asterisks. Two bait genes (Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, MA_118702g0010; Caffeoyl shikimate esterase, MA_87599g0010; indicated in parentheses) had positive correlations with the other baits, but the value did not exceed 0.8 in all datasets. UP, Enriched plasma membrane vesicles; MF, microsomal vesicles; NA, no annotation. Venn diagram representing genes whose expression correlated with the bait genes in four different datasets: Tissue culture (Laitinen ), ConGenIE (Nystedt ), Norwood (Jokipii-Lukkari ), and Ray-tracheid (Blokhina ). The number of ABC, MATE, and MFS transporters is given in parentheses. Sixty-three genes correlated with the baits with correlation coefficients >0.8 in all datasets studied, creating a candidate list of genes related to lignin biosynthesis (Table 3). Although all 12 bait genes had positive correlations with each other, the correlation coefficients of two genes did not exceed 0.8; these are included in Table 3. Of the genes shown in Table 3, 20 were present in the proteomic data of the xylem samples. Among the genes, there were two additional monolignol biosynthesis genes (C4H, MA_202753g0010; CCoAOMT, MA_667858g0010). Three transporters (amino acid permease, copper-transporting ATPase, and putative cadmium/zinc-transporting ATPase) correlated with the baits, along with H+-ATPase interacting protein (Table 3). None of these were detected in the proteomic data. The shikimate pathway was represented by eight members. Four redox enzymes were also detected. Three kinases, a transcription factor LOB domain-containing protein 6, and a MYB transcription factor also had good co-expression with the baits.

Identifying candidate transporters from the proteomic and correlation data

We used four criteria in our search for candidates for monolignol transporter(s). (i) ABCB and ABCG transporters were preferred due to their reported monolignol transport and similar known substrates (Yazaki, 2006; Rea, 2007; Verrier ; Yazaki ; Alejandro ), and MFS and MATE transporters were preferred due to the detected coniferin/H+-antiporter activity in the Norway spruce xylem in the present study (Fig. 3). (ii) The correlation of the monolignol biosynthesis bait genes with transporters (see above). (iii) The presence of a transporter in the proteomic data, and its correlation in gene expression with lignification-related genes. (iv) In the case of ABC transporters, sequence similarity to the putative p-coumaryl alcohol transporter AtABCG29 (Alejandro ). In the gene correlation analysis, 162 ABC, MFS, or MATE transporters showed co-expression with the bait genes in at least one of the datasets used (Fig. 6, Supplementary Table S1B). Six transporters showed co-expression with the baits in three datasets (one ABC transporter and five MFS transporters), and 17 transporters had co-expression with the baits in two datasets. Of these, several ABCB, ABCG, and MFS transporters, and two MATE transporters were considered as candidates (Table 4). Six ABC transporters and one MFS transporter were detected in both the proteomic and the correlation analyses in at least one dataset (Table 4). An ABCG transporter (MA_18770g0010), which correlated with the baits in three datasets and was detected in the xylem UP fraction, makes a good candidate for monolignol transport. Its sequence homology to the putative Arabidopsis p-coumaryl alcohol transporter AtABCG29 (Alejandro ) was good (59.6%). Additionally, two spruce proteins with sequence homology to AtABCG29 (MA_135152g0010, 67.6%; MA_10260477g0010, 54.6%) were present in the xylem and phloem UP fractions. A MFS transporter (MA_10428871g0010) whose closest Arabidopsis homolog is annotated as a monosaccharide-sensing protein (AT4G35300.1, 56.9%), was found in the xylem UP vesicles and correlated with the baits in the tissue culture data. Two other transporters, MA_10437245g0020 (transmembrane protein 184A) and MA_10429543g0010 (plastidic glucose transporter 4) had co-expression with the baits in two datasets and were present in developing xylem membranes (Table 4).
Table 4.

Candidate transporters for monolignol transport in Norway spruce

Gene accessionSubgroupUniprot annotationClosest Arabidopsis homolog Sequence homology to the closest Arabidopsis homolog (%)Substrate of the closest Arabidopsis homologPresence in the proteomic dataCorrelation to baits in gene expression dataPicked based on correlation to other lignin biosynthesis genes
Xylem UP/MFPhloem UP/MFCultured cells UP/ MFXylem MFPhloem MFCultured cells MFTissue culture (Laitinen et al., 2017)Congenie (Nystedt et al., 2013)Norwood (Jokipii- Lukkari et al., 2017)Ray- tracheid (Blokhina et al., 2019)
ABC transporters
MA_10434957g 0010 aBABC transporter B family member 1 AT2G36910.1 ABCB170.6IAAXXXXX
MA_62683g 0010BABC transporter B family member 1 AT2G36910.1 ABCB160.2IAAXX
MA_138894g 0010BABC transporter B family member 4 AT2G47000.1 ABCB465.1AuxinXX
MA_635039g 0010BABC transporter B family member 11AT1G02520.1 ABCB1170.0?XX
MA_9415070g 0020BABC transporter B family member 15AT3G28345.1 ABCB1553.8?XX
MA_40328g 0010BABC transporter B family member 20AT3G55320.1ABCB2077.0?XX
MA_107576g 0010BPutative multidrug resistance proteinAT3G28345.1 ABCB1555.7?XX
MA_10260477g 0010 bG (associated)Pleiotropic drug resistance 1AT3G16340.1 ABCG29 54.6 p-Coumaryl alcoholXX
MA_135152g 0010 bGABC transporter G family member 29AT1G59870.1 ABCG36 67.2CadmiumXX
MA_134489g 0020 a,bGProbable pleiotropic drug resistance protein 2AT3G16340.1 ABCG29 53.8 p-Coumaryl alcoholXXX
MA_17319g 0020 aGProbable pleiotropic drug resistance protein 2AT1G15520.1 ABCG4069.0ABAXXXXXX
MA_18770g 0010 aGPutative pleiotropic drug resistance protein 7AT1G15520.1 ABCG40 66.5ABAXXXXX
MA_31011g 0010 aGPutative pleiotropic drug resistance protein 7 AT1G15520.1 ABCG4050.5ABAXX
MFS transporters
MA_10428182g 0010MFSPlastidic glucose transporter 4AT5G16150.175.3GlucoseXX
MA_22713g 0010MFSProbable anion transporter 3AT2G38060.157.4Inorganic phosphate, sugarXXX
MA_10437216g 0010MFSProbable peptide/nitrate transporterAT3G54450.148.6Oligopeptide?XXX
MA_10436119g 0010MFSInositol transporter 1AT2G43330.149.5 Myo-inositolXX
MA_5112g 0010MFSProbable peptide/ nitrate transporterAT1G22540.156.1OligopeptideXX
MA_13801g 0010MFSSugar transporter ERD6-like 16AT5G18840.152.5CarbohydrateXXX
MA_77652g 0010MFSSugar transporter ERD6-like 16AT5G18840.154.9CarbohydrateXX
MA_130810g 0010 aMFSSugar transport protein 13AT5G26340.174.1Glucose, hexoseXX
MA_10428871g 0010MFSMonosaccharide- sensing protein 2AT4G35300.156.9MonosaccharideXX
MA_10429543g 0010 aSugar (and other) transporter)Plastidic glucose transporter 4AT5G16150.183.7Glucose (putative)XXXXX
MATE and other transporters
MA_10437152g 0010MATEMATE efflux family protein 1AT1G51340.257.2?XX
MA_94941g 0010MATEProtein TRANSPARENT TESTA 12AT5G44050.145.2?XX
MA_10437245g 0020 aOrganic solute transporter OstalphaTransmembrane protein 184AAT3G05940.154.7?XXX

The presented transporters were detected in the proteomic and/or correlation analysis. Correlation in gene expression to baits in two out of four datasets, or the presence in the proteomic data of lignifying materials combined with correlation in gene expression to the baits or other lignin biosynthesis genes earned the transporter a place in the candidate list. UP, Enriched plasma membrane vesicles; MF, microsomal vesicles. The best candidates. Arabidopsis sequence homolog transports p-coumaryl alcohol.

Candidate transporters for monolignol transport in Norway spruce The presented transporters were detected in the proteomic and/or correlation analysis. Correlation in gene expression to baits in two out of four datasets, or the presence in the proteomic data of lignifying materials combined with correlation in gene expression to the baits or other lignin biosynthesis genes earned the transporter a place in the candidate list. UP, Enriched plasma membrane vesicles; MF, microsomal vesicles. The best candidates. Arabidopsis sequence homolog transports p-coumaryl alcohol. Many other transporters were detected in the membrane proteomes of lignifying cell types but did not show co-expression with the baits (Supplementary Table S1B). A correlation analysis was done with these transporters as “baits” to search for co-expression with other lignification-related genes. This analysis led to the identification of an ABCG transporter (MA_134489g0020) and a MFS transporter (MA_130810g0010) (Table 4). The ABCG transporter was detected in developing xylem and correlated with caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase, a peroxidase, a dirigent protein, and a glucan endo-1,3-β-glucosidase (Supplementary Table S3). The MFS transporter was detected in lignin-forming cultured cells, and correlated in gene expression with three monolignol pathway genes, six glycosyltransferases, five peroxidases, 12 chitinases, and one dirigent protein (Supplementary Table S3).

Discussion

Transport of lignin precursors in various materials

Monolignol glucosides are candidates for transported forms of monolignols as they are found in the cambial sap and developing xylem in many gymnosperm tree species (e.g. Freudenberg and Harkin 1963; Schmid and Grisebach, 1982; Savidge, 1989; Savidge and Förster, 1998; Tsuji ; Morikawa ; Tsuyama and Takabe, 2014; Aoki ; Terashima ). Monolignol aglycones, by contrast, are not usually detected in metabolite analyses (e.g. Laitinen ) or are detected only at low levels (Schmid and Grisebach, 1982; Savidge and Förster, 2001). Here, we observed coniferin transport in MF prepared from developing xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce, as well as MF prepared from non-lignin-forming tobacco BY-2 cells (Fig. 2). By contrast, vesicles prepared from developing spruce phloem that does not lignify did not show this transporter activity. Millimolar concentrations (up to 3.7 mM) of coniferin have been detected in the cambial sap of Norway spruce (Schmid and Grisebach, 1982), hence, the Km value for coniferin (0.13 mM) in developing spruce xylem determined in our study is in the same range. BY-2 cells do not contain endogenous coniferin, suggesting that the transport activity detected here could be to compartmentalize and detoxify xenobiotics in the vacuole (Le Roy ). Biochemical results suggest that the two transporters present in developing spruce xylem and tobacco BY-2 cells (putative orthologs) are tonoplast-located H+/coniferin antiporters (e.g. MATE or MFS transporters). This conclusion was deduced from their inhibition by bafilomycin A1 (a tonoplast H+-pump inhibitor), gramicidin, and CCCP (both ion gradient uncouplers). Based on Km values (Table 1), the coniferin transport detected in spruce xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells was likely to be mediated by different transporters. Thus, Norway spruce seems to have two transporters capable of transporting coniferin, of which the tonoplastic xylem transporter appears to be biochemically similar to the transporters detected in several tree species (Tsuyama ) and could even be similar to the coniferin transporter detected by Miao and Liu (2010) in Arabidopsis aerial tissues. Recently, Japanese cypress and hybrid poplar were shown to contain p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside transport activity (Tsuyama ). Interestingly, coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol inhibited the p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside-transporting activity, but only when added in excess (5-fold concentration). The transporters in spruce xylem and tobacco BY-2 cells were also able to transport p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside, but the transport was inhibited by an equal concentration of coniferin (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. S1). The results obtained in the present study do not support the hypothesis of PM transport of monolignol alcohols, as detected in Arabidopsis (Miao and Liu, 2010; Alejandro ), or the hypothesis of PM transport of monolignol dimers or dimer glucosides (Table 2). Since tobacco BY-2 cells do not lignify or contain coniferin (Väisänen ) but have a similar tonoplastic transporter for coniferin as developing xylem cells (Figs 2, 4), it is unlikely that this transporter is specifically involved in lignification. The transporter in BY-2 cells is probably not specific for coniferin and could have other substrate(s) in vivo. The same could be true for the transporter detected in developing xylem. If these two proteins are orthologs and serve the same biological function in planta, it is possible that they function in stress responses, for example, against pathogens or herbivores, by transporting coniferin to vacuoles for storage, from where it can be released after tissue rupture and hydrolyzed to coniferyl alcohol. Since coniferyl alcohol is toxic (Väisänen ), it could serve as a protectant. This could be a ubiquitous feature in plant cells. This idea is supported by the transport results reported by Miao and Liu (2010), who showed that vacuolar vesicles prepared from Arabidopsis aerial parts consisting mostly of non-lignifying mesophyll cells have a biochemically similar coniferin transporter. However, in xylem of gymnosperms, where high amounts of coniferin are present in vacuoles (Morikawa ), coniferin (as well as p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside) is likely to be the preferred substrate. A model in which coniferin is released from its vacuolar storage, the glucose moiety is cleaved, and the released coniferyl alcohol is used in lignin polymerization is supported by the presence of coniferin β-glucosidases, which have been shown to exist in the xylem of lodgepole pine and poplar (Dharmawardhana ; Samuels ; Le Roy ). Thus, a coniferin transporter could be part of the lignin biosynthesis machinery in xylem. Alternatively, as suggested by Tsuyama et al. (2013, 2019), coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside transporter(s) may localize in the endomembranes and participate in vesicular transport of monolignols into the cell wall.

Membrane proteome for Norway spruce developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cells

In order to find candidate transporters for monolignols, we carried out a proteomic analysis of membrane proteins isolated from developing xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce. As a comparison, developing phloem, where only a small portion of cells lignify (those developing to stone cells), was used. The 619 proteins in the developing xylem UP fraction included enzymes with roles in multiple biological functions. Since one-third of the identifications were of membrane transporters and proteins involved in vesicular transport (Supplementary Table S1B, Supplementary Fig. S3A), the importance of relocation of molecules is obvious. The situation is very similar to that in developing xylem of poplar (Populus tremula × P. tremuloides; Nilsson ), where secondary cell wall is deposited and vesicular trafficking is needed not only for lignification but also for hemicellulose and cell wall protein deposition. The 483 proteins present specifically in the UP samples of developing xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells but not in non-lignifying phloem (Fig. 5) include proteins putatively involved in secondary cell wall formation and lignification. The small set of 17 proteins shared between the UP samples of the two lignifying materials support this, since it included two monolignol biosynthesis genes, NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase, flavoprotein WrbA (a quinone reductase), sucrose synthase, and cytochrome b5 isoform B (Supplementary Table S1B). The xylem UP fraction also included proteins involved in signaling, metabolism, and biosynthesis (Supplementary Fig. S3A).

Candidates for monolignol transport in Norway spruce

To identify candidate monolignol transporters in Norway spruce, a membrane proteomic analysis of developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells was complemented with a correlation analysis of pre-existing gene expression data. Genes encoding transporters that were co-expressed with the monolignol biosynthesis genes were tabulated (Table 4, Supplementary Table S1B). The biochemical results support the role of an H+ antiporter in monolignol transport, as coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside were transported into Norway spruce xylem vesicles with this type of transporter (Figs 3, 4), in a similar fashion to that observed in other tree species (Tsuyama et al., 2013, 2019). Thus, MFS transporters that use chemiosmotic gradients for uniport, symport, or antiport functions (Remy and Duque, 2014) are our candidates for monolignol transport. These transporters have previously been associated with the transport of sugars, nitrate, and oligopeptides (Remy and Duque, 2014). In the present study, the expression of multiple spruce MFS transporters was found to correlate with that of the monolignol biosynthesis genes, and two of them were present in the proteomic results (Table 4). Thus, some of these transporters could function in the monolignol glucoside transport that was detected in developing xylem and lignin-forming cultured cells (Figs 2–4). MA_130810g0010 was the only MFS detected in the cultured cells (Table 4, Supplementary Table S1B). Furthermore, this gene showed co-expression with three monolignol biosynthesis genes and six glycosyltransferases (Supplementary Table S3), making it a suitable candidate for the coniferin transporter. The MFS MA_10428871g0010, which was detected in xylem, is another good candidate. Our results suggest that MATE transporters are not involved in monolignol transport, as no MATE transporters were detected in the membrane proteomic analysis, and the expression of only two MATE transporter genes correlated with that of the monolignol biosynthesis baits. MATE transporters are known to transport a variety of secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids and alkaloids, xenobiotics, citrate, and phytohormones (Takanashi ). ABC transporters transport multiple phenolic substrates (reviewed by Lefèvre and Boutry, 2018), and also hormones (ABCBs in auxin transport and ABCGs in abscisic acid transport). Table 4 includes several ABC transporters that were either found in the membrane proteome of developing xylem/lignin-forming cultured cells or showed co-expression with the monolignol biosynthesis genes. Similar to that reported in Arabidopsis (Kaneda ), multiple ABCB transporters in spruce correlated with the monolignol biosynthesis enzymes in terms of gene expression. Out of these transporters, two spruce ABCB transporters were sequence homologs with Arabidopsis ABCB11 and ABCB15, which have been shown to be involved in auxin transport (Kaneda ). Six ABCG transporters that have sequence homology to some known or hypothesized monolignol transporters were detected (Table 4). ABCG transporters have been linked to monolignol transport, since substrates of this subgroup include several phenolic compounds (e.g. p-coumaryl alcohol; Alejandro ; Lefèvre and Boutry, 2018). In addition, multiple Arabidopsis ABCGs correlate in terms of their gene expression with several lignin biosynthesis genes (Takeuchi ), to a transcription factor, MYB58, which is involved in lignin biosynthesis (Zhou ), and to a peroxidase, AtPrx25, with a suggested role in lignification during tracheary element differentiation in cell suspension cultures (Takeuchi ). AtABCG36 is a candidate from such a screen (Takeuchi ). AtABCG40 (the closest sequence homolog to three spruce candidates in Table 4), however, is likely to be an abscisic acid transporter (Kang ).

New players for lignin biosynthesis from gene co-expression and proteomic analyses?

The membrane proteome has great potential to reveal new players for lignification, as a number of monolignol biosynthesis enzymes are known to be anchored to membranes (as discussed below). In addition, a new computational study by Vermaas suggests that multiple phenolic compounds involved in lignification can diffuse into or even be enriched in membrane bilayers, thus creating an environment with a high substrate concentration for the enzymes. In our study, the genes correlating in terms of expression with the 12 monolignol biosynthesis bait genes identified by Jokipii-Lukkari are largely involved in monolignol production, and one-third of them putatively function as enzymes bound to a membrane (Table 3). The present results suggest that the co-expressed set of monolignol biosynthesis genes identified by Jokipii-Lukkari is two genes larger and includes C4H (MA_202753g0010) and CCoAOMT (MA_667858g0010). Eight out of these 14 genes (PAL, C3H, three C4Hs, COMT, and two CCoAOMTs) were detected in the membrane proteomic data (Table 3). It is interesting to hypothesize that a proportion of the proteins encoded by the co-expressed genes could function in association with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), or with other ER proteins, as discussed by Wang . C4H/C3H function as homo- and heteromers associated with the ER (Chen ; Bassard ), and some PAL enzymes associate with C4H (Achnine ). COMT and CCoAOMT, on the other hand, have not been shown to localize in the ER, or to form any complexes. Whether the spruce COMT and CCoAOMT now detected interact with membranes or with membrane proteins remains to be resolved. 4CL (Chen ) and CCR and CAD (Yan ; not detected in the present proteomic results), by contrast, form heterodimers that are putatively cytoplasmic. Cell wall modification seems to be tightly coordinated with lignification, and the results suggest that the regulation of these pathways is mediated by a transcription factor LOB domain-containing protein/AS2 (MA_10434782g0020), found to co-express with the baits reported in Jokipii-Lukkari and a novel MYB (MA_33964g0010) (Table 3).

Conclusions

Biochemical transport assays conducted with vesicles isolated from developing xylem, phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells of Norway spruce point to MFS- or MATE-transporter-mediated monolignol glucoside transport, and do not support such a role for ABC transporters. Xylem vesicles transported both coniferin and p-coumaryl alcohol glucoside, but inhibitor assays suggested that this transport is across the tonoplast. The transport of monolignol glucosides was also detected in vesicles prepared from tobacco BY-2 cells, which do not lignify. The presence of monolignol glucoside transport activity in BY-2 cells suggest that the transport activity is not involved in lignification but may be involved in, for example, general defense. Based on Km values, lignin-forming, tissue-cultured cells of spruce had a different transporter for coniferin than the transporter in xylem. Comparison of four published gene expression datasets (ConGenIE, Norwood, Norway spruce tissue culture, and Norway spruce ray-tracheid) revealed a number of potential transporters for monolignols/monolignol glucosides. The proteomic and/or co-expression analyses resulted in a list of candidate genes for monolignol/monolignol glucoside transport, consisting of 13 ABC transporters, nine MFS transporters, and four MATE or other transporters. These are candidate transporters for further studies.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online. Protocol S1. Synthesis of 14C-coniferin. Fig. S1. Inhibition of 14C-coniferin transport in vesicles prepared from Norway spruce developing xylem and tobacco BY-2 cells with different phenolic compounds. Fig. 2. REVIGO treemaps showing cellular component of sodium deoxycholate-solubilized upper phase and microsomal fractions of Norway spruce developing xylem. Fig. S3. REVIGO treemaps showing biological function of sodium deoxycholate- and sodium dodecyl sulfate-solubilized upper phase fractions of Norway spruce developing xylem, developing phloem, and lignin-forming cultured cells. Table S1. Protein identifications of all membrane fractions and genes correlating with monolignol biosynthesis bait genes. Table S2. Proteins and peptides detected in the proteomic analysis of Norway spruce UP fractions. Table S3. Proteins and peptides detected in the proteomic analysis of Norway spruce MF fractions. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  53 in total

Review 1.  Use of vanadate as protein-phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitor.

Authors:  J A Gordon
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Ion transfer across lipid membranes in the presence of gramicidin A. I. Studies of the unit conductance channel.

Authors:  S B Hladky; D A Haydon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1972-08-09

3.  Cellular machinery of wood production: differentiation of secondary xylem in Pinus contorta var. latifolia.

Authors:  A L Samuels; K H Rensing; C J Douglas; S D Mansfield; D P Dharmawardhana; B E Ellis
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  The Plant Genome Integrative Explorer Resource: PlantGenIE.org.

Authors:  David Sundell; Chanaka Mannapperuma; Sergiu Netotea; Nicolas Delhomme; Yao-Cheng Lin; Andreas Sjödin; Yves Van de Peer; Stefan Jansson; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Nathaniel R Street
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  P-glycoprotein is stably inhibited by vanadate-induced trapping of nucleotide at a single catalytic site.

Authors:  I L Urbatsch; B Sankaran; J Weber; A E Senior
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Transcriptional Roadmap to Seasonal Variation in Wood Formation of Norway Spruce.

Authors:  Soile Jokipii-Lukkari; Nicolas Delhomme; Bastian Schiffthaler; Chanaka Mannapperuma; Jakob Prestele; Ove Nilsson; Nathaniel R Street; Hannele Tuominen
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution.

Authors:  Björn Nystedt; Nathaniel R Street; Anna Wetterbom; Andrea Zuccolo; Yao-Cheng Lin; Douglas G Scofield; Francesco Vezzi; Nicolas Delhomme; Stefania Giacomello; Andrey Alexeyenko; Riccardo Vicedomini; Kristoffer Sahlin; Ellen Sherwood; Malin Elfstrand; Lydia Gramzow; Kristina Holmberg; Jimmie Hällman; Olivier Keech; Lisa Klasson; Maxim Koriabine; Melis Kucukoglu; Max Käller; Johannes Luthman; Fredrik Lysholm; Totte Niittylä; Ake Olson; Nemanja Rilakovic; Carol Ritland; Josep A Rosselló; Juliana Sena; Thomas Svensson; Carlos Talavera-López; Günter Theißen; Hannele Tuominen; Kevin Vanneste; Zhi-Qiang Wu; Bo Zhang; Philipp Zerbe; Lars Arvestad; Rishikesh Bhalerao; Joerg Bohlmann; Jean Bousquet; Rosario Garcia Gil; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Pieter de Jong; John MacKay; Michele Morgante; Kermit Ritland; Björn Sundberg; Stacey Lee Thompson; Yves Van de Peer; Björn Andersson; Ove Nilsson; Pär K Ingvarsson; Joakim Lundeberg; Stefan Jansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The transport of monomers during lignification in plants: anything goes but how?

Authors:  Mendel Perkins; Rebecca A Smith; Lacey Samuels
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 9.740

9.  Phase transfer surfactant-aided trypsin digestion for membrane proteome analysis.

Authors:  Takeshi Masuda; Masaru Tomita; Yasushi Ishihama
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Enzyme-Enzyme Interactions in Monolignol Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Jack P Wang; Baoguang Liu; Yi Sun; Vincent L Chiang; Ronald R Sederoff
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  3 in total

1.  Monolignol export by diffusion down a polymerization-induced concentration gradient.

Authors:  Mendel L Perkins; Mathias Schuetz; Faride Unda; Kent T Chen; Marcel B Bally; Jayesh A Kulkarni; Yifan Yan; Joana Pico; Simone D Castellarin; Shawn D Mansfield; A Lacey Samuels
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 12.085

Review 2.  Mini Review: Transport of Hydrophobic Polymers Into the Plant Apoplast.

Authors:  Anzhou Xin; Klaus Herburger
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 3.  UGT72, a Major Glycosyltransferase Family for Flavonoid and Monolignol Homeostasis in Plants.

Authors:  Nathanaël Speeckaert; Mondher El Jaziri; Marie Baucher; Marc Behr
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.