Literature DB >> 32777071

Evaluation of ruminal degradability and metabolism of feedlot finishing diets with or without cotton byproducts.

Andrea L Warner1, Paul A Beck1, Andrew P Foote1, Kaitlyn N Pierce1, Colton A Robison1, Nicole E Stevens1, Blake K Wilson1.   

Abstract

Cotton byproducts can be an economical source of protein, fat, and fiber in cattle finishing diets. The objectives of this study were 1) to assess the effects of including whole cottonseed (WCS) and cotton gin trash (CGT) in finishing diets on in situ ruminal degradability and 2) to determine the effects of including cotton byproducts in a finishing diet on rumen fluid pH, lactate, and volatile fatty acid concentrations. Six ruminally cannulated steers were used in a crossover design. Treatments included a control diet (CON; 7% prairie hay [PH], 15% Sweet Bran, 67.25% rolled corn, and 5% liquid supplement) and a cotton byproduct diet (CTN; 7% CGT, 15% WCS, 72.25% rolled corn, and 5% water). Both diets included 0.75% urea and 5% dry supplement. In situ bags containing individual diet ingredients and whole diet samples were incubated in the rumen for up to 96 h. Rumen fluid samples were collected over a 24-h period. No treatment × substrate interactions were detected for any fraction of dry matter (DM) or organic matter (OM) degradability for individual ingredients or whole diets (P ≥ 0.14). The A, B, and C fractions, disappearance rate (Kd), and effective degradability of DM and OM differed between diet ingredients (P ≤ 0.04) but were not different between CON and CTN substrates (P ≥ 0.25). A treatment × substrate interaction (P = 0.04) was detected for the effective degradability of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) of CGT and PH but there was no interaction for other fractions (P ≥ 0.27). The A fraction of NDF was greater (P < 0.001) for CGT than PH; however, the B fraction of NDF tended to be greater (P = 0.08) for PH than CGT. No differences (P ≥ 0.37) were detected for the % NDF disappearance at 48 h between CON and CTN substrates. A tendency for a treatment × substrate interaction (P = 0.10) was observed for the effective degradability of starch among diets; however, when the CON substrate was incubated in steers consuming the CON diet, effective degradability of starch was not different (P = 0.84) from when the CTN diet was incubated in steers consuming the CTN diet. There was no treatment × time interaction or treatment effect for rumen pH; however, there was a time effect (P = 0.03). Steers consuming the CTN diet had greater molar proportions of acetate and decreased molar proportions of propionate compared with CON steers (P < 0.01). This experiment suggests that there are minimal differences between the digestibility of finishing diets containing cotton byproducts and those comprised of traditional finishing diet ingredients.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cotton byproducts; cotton gin trash; feedlot; metabolism; ruminal degradability; whole cottonseed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32777071      PMCID: PMC7466694          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets.

Authors:  V Robles; L A González; A Ferret; X Manteca; S Calsamiglia
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  In situ evaluation of the ruminal and intestinal digestibility of heat-treated whole cottonseeds.

Authors:  A Arieli; A Ben-Moshe; S Zamwel; H Tagari
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Influence of level and type of diet on ruminal pH and VFA, respiratory rate and EKG patterns of steers.

Authors:  T S Rumsey; P A Putnam; J Bond; R R Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effects of physically effective fiber on intake, chewing activity, and ruminal acidosis for dairy cows fed diets based on corn silage.

Authors:  K A Beauchemin; W Z Yang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Differential passage rates and digestion of neutral detergent fiber from grain and forages in 30, 60 and 90% concentrate diets fed to steers.

Authors:  M H Poore; J A Moore; R S Swingle
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effect of dietary energy source on in vitro substrate utilization and insulin sensitivity of muscle and adipose tissues of Angus and Wagyu steers.

Authors:  R D Rhoades; J E Sawyer; K Y Chung; M L Schell; D K Lunt; S B Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Wet corn gluten feed and alfalfa hay combinations in steam-flaked corn finishing cattle diets.

Authors:  J J Sindt; J S Drouillard; E C Titgemeyer; S P Montgomery; C M Coetzer; T B Farran; J N Pike; J J Higgins; R T Ethington
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  The relative significance of acetate and glucose as precursors for lipid synthesis in liver and adipose tissue from ruminants.

Authors:  R W Hanson; F J Ballard
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 9.  Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook.

Authors:  T G Nagaraja; E C Titgemeyer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Processing cotton gin trash to enhance in vitro dry matter digestibility in reduced time.

Authors:  Lester O Pordesimo; Samuel J Ray; Michael J Buschermohle; John C Waller; John B Wilkerson
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.642

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of supplementation rate of an extruded dried distillers' grains cube fed to growing heifers on voluntary intake and digestibility of bermudagrass hay.

Authors:  Jordan M Adams; Jeff Robe; Zane Grigsby; Abigail Rathert-Williams; Mike Major; David L Lalman; Andrew P Foote; Luis O Tedeschi; Paul A Beck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.