Beom Joon Kim1, Bijoy K Menon2, Jun Yup Kim1, Dong-Woo Shin1, Sung Hyun Baik3, Cheolkyu Jung3, Moon-Ku Han1, Andrew Demchuk3, Hee-Joon Bae1. 1. Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, Calgary Stroke Program, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) after ischemic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion is usually constrained by a specific window of less than 16 to 24 hours from the time the patient was last known well (LKW). Patients with slow progression and tenacious collateral circulation may persist beyond 16 hours. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of salvageable tissues 16 hours or more from LKW after ischemic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion and investigate the effectiveness of EVT in delayed large vessel occlusion. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case-control study, from a total of 8032 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack who were admitted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, to a single referral university hospital, 150 patients were retrospectively identified who had an acute ischemic stroke with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusion, had a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or more, and arrived 16 hours or more from time LKW. The decision for EVT was made by a treating physician according to the institutional protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Baseline ischemic core, collateral circulation status, and computed tomographic or magnetic resonance perfusion parameters were retrospectively quantified. Follow-up images, evaluated a median of 93 hours (interquartile range, 66-120 hours) after arrival, were used to assess the final infarct and hemorrhagic transformation. The main outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. RESULTS: For 150 patients (81 men [54%]; mean [SD] age at onset, 70.1 [13.0] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 [interquartile range, 8-18]), the median ischemic core volume was 11.5 mL (interquartile range, 0-39.1 mL), the median penumbra volume (>6 seconds) was 55.0 mL (interquartile range, 15-128 mL), and the median mismatch ratio was 4.0 (interquartile range, 0.9-18.3). By the imaging inclusion criteria for EVT trials, there were 50 DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo)-eligible patients (33%), 58 DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke)-eligible patients (39%), and 57 ESCAPE (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times)-eligible patients (38%). Endovascular treatment was performed for 24 patients (16%). In propensity score-matched analyses, EVT was associated with better odds of a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (adjusted odds ratio, 11.08 [95% CI, 1.88-108.60]) and a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score shift (common adjusted odds ratio, 5.17 [95% CI, 1.80-15.62]). Type 2 parenchymal hemorrhage was seen in 3 of 24 patients (13%) who received EVT and in 4 of 126 patients (3%) who received medical management (adjusted odds ratio, 4.06 [95% CI, 0.63-26.30]). In a subgroup of 109 patients who were 24 hours from time LKW, EVT was associated with a favorable mRS shift (common adjusted odds ratio, 10.54 [95% CI, 2.18-59.34]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting very late (>16 hours to 10 days) from the time they were LKW may benefit from EVT.
IMPORTANCE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) after ischemic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion is usually constrained by a specific window of less than 16 to 24 hours from the time the patient was last known well (LKW). Patients with slow progression and tenacious collateral circulation may persist beyond 16 hours. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of salvageable tissues 16 hours or more from LKW after ischemic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion and investigate the effectiveness of EVT in delayed large vessel occlusion. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case-control study, from a total of 8032 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack who were admitted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, to a single referral university hospital, 150 patients were retrospectively identified who had an acute ischemic stroke with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusion, had a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or more, and arrived 16 hours or more from time LKW. The decision for EVT was made by a treating physician according to the institutional protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Baseline ischemic core, collateral circulation status, and computed tomographic or magnetic resonance perfusion parameters were retrospectively quantified. Follow-up images, evaluated a median of 93 hours (interquartile range, 66-120 hours) after arrival, were used to assess the final infarct and hemorrhagic transformation. The main outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. RESULTS: For 150 patients (81 men [54%]; mean [SD] age at onset, 70.1 [13.0] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 [interquartile range, 8-18]), the median ischemic core volume was 11.5 mL (interquartile range, 0-39.1 mL), the median penumbra volume (>6 seconds) was 55.0 mL (interquartile range, 15-128 mL), and the median mismatch ratio was 4.0 (interquartile range, 0.9-18.3). By the imaging inclusion criteria for EVT trials, there were 50 DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo)-eligible patients (33%), 58 DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke)-eligible patients (39%), and 57 ESCAPE (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times)-eligible patients (38%). Endovascular treatment was performed for 24 patients (16%). In propensity score-matched analyses, EVT was associated with better odds of a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (adjusted odds ratio, 11.08 [95% CI, 1.88-108.60]) and a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score shift (common adjusted odds ratio, 5.17 [95% CI, 1.80-15.62]). Type 2 parenchymal hemorrhage was seen in 3 of 24 patients (13%) who received EVT and in 4 of 126 patients (3%) who received medical management (adjusted odds ratio, 4.06 [95% CI, 0.63-26.30]). In a subgroup of 109 patients who were 24 hours from time LKW, EVT was associated with a favorable mRS shift (common adjusted odds ratio, 10.54 [95% CI, 2.18-59.34]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting very late (>16 hours to 10 days) from the time they were LKW may benefit from EVT.
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Søren Christensen; Brian M Tress; Leonid Churilov; Patricia M Desmond; Mark W Parsons; P Alan Barber; Christopher R Levi; Christopher Bladin; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chushuang Chen; Mark W Parsons; Matthew Clapham; Christopher Oldmeadow; Christopher R Levi; Longting Lin; Xin Cheng; Min Lou; Timothy J Kleinig; Kenneth S Butcher; Qiang Dong; Andrew Bivard Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Götz Thomalla; Claus Z Simonsen; Florent Boutitie; Grethe Andersen; Yves Berthezene; Bastian Cheng; Bharath Cheripelli; Tae-Hee Cho; Franz Fazekas; Jens Fiehler; Ian Ford; Ivana Galinovic; Susanne Gellissen; Amir Golsari; Johannes Gregori; Matthias Günther; Jorge Guibernau; Karl Georg Häusler; Michael Hennerici; André Kemmling; Jacob Marstrand; Boris Modrau; Lars Neeb; Natalia Perez de la Ossa; Josep Puig; Peter Ringleb; Pascal Roy; Enno Scheel; Wouter Schonewille; Joaquin Serena; Stefan Sunaert; Kersten Villringer; Anke Wouters; Vincent Thijs; Martin Ebinger; Matthias Endres; Jochen B Fiebach; Robin Lemmens; Keith W Muir; Norbert Nighoghossian; Salvador Pedraza; Christian Gerloff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronan Motyer; John Thornton; Sarah Power; Paul Brennan; Alan O'Hare; Seamus Looby; David J Williams; Barry Moynihan; Sean Murphy Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Charles B L M Majoie; Gregory W Albers; Bijoy K Menon; Nawaf Yassi; Gagan Sharma; Wim H van Zwam; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Andrew M Demchuk; Francis Guillemin; Philip White; Antoni Dávalos; Aad van der Lugt; Kenneth S Butcher; Aboubaker Cherifi; Henk A Marquering; Geoffrey Cloud; Juan M Macho Fernández; Jeremy Madigan; Catherine Oppenheim; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Jai Shankar; Hester Lingsma; Alain Bonafé; Hélène Raoult; María Hernández-Pérez; Aditya Bharatha; Reza Jahan; Olav Jansen; Sébastien Richard; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Marc Soudant; Lucia Aja; Stephen M Davis; Timo Krings; Marie Tisserand; Luis San Román; Alejandro Tomasello; Debbie Beumer; Scott Brown; David S Liebeskind; Serge Bracard; Keith W Muir; Diederik W J Dippel; Mayank Goyal; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin; Michael D Hill; Peter J Mitchell Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Thomas W Okell; George W J Harston; Michael A Chappell; Fintan Sheerin; James Kennedy; Peter Jezzard Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jan C Purrucker; Peter A Ringleb; Fatih Seker; Arne Potreck; Simon Nagel; Silvia Schönenberger; Anne Berberich; Ulf Neuberger; Markus Möhlenbruch; Charlotte Weyland Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 6.430
Authors: Michel J A M van Putten; Christoph Fahlke; Karl W Kafitz; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Christine R Rose Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Philipp Taussky; Guilherme Agnoletto; Ramesh Grandhi; Matthew D Alexander; Ka-Ho Wong; Gregory W Albers; Adam de Havenon Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 8.572
Authors: Moriz Herzberg; Korbinian Scherling; Robert Stahl; Steffen Tiedt; Frank A Wollenweber; Clemens Küpper; Katharina Feil; Robert Forbrig; Maximilian Patzig; Lars Kellert; Wolfgang G Kunz; Paul Reidler; Hanna Zimmermann; Thomas Liebig; Marianne Dieterich; Franziska Dorn Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 3.649