Literature DB >> 32776518

Measurement of airway pressure during high-flow nasal therapy in apnoeic oxygenation: a randomised controlled crossover trial.

T Riva1, J Meyer1, L Theiler2, D Obrist3, L Bütikofer4, R Greif1,5, S Nabecker1,6.   

Abstract

It is recognised that high-flow nasal therapy can prevent desaturation during airway management. Studies in spontaneously breathing patients show an almost linear relationship between flow rate and positive airway pressure in the nasopharynx. Positive airway pressure has been suggested as one of the possible mechanisms explaining how high-flow nasal therapy works. However, data on pressures generated by high-flow nasal therapy in apnoeic adults under general anaesthesia are absent. This randomised controlled crossover trial investigated airway pressures generated by different flow rates during high-flow nasal therapy in anaesthetised and paralysed apnoeic patients, comparing pressures with closed and open mouths. Following induction of anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade, a continuous jaw thrust was used to enable airway patency. Airway pressure was measured in the right main bronchus, the middle of the trachea and the pharynx, using a fibreoptically-placed catheter connected to a pressure transducer. Each measurement was randomised with respect to closed or open mouth and different flow rates. Twenty patients undergoing elective surgery were included (mean (SD) age 38 (18) years, BMI 25.0 (3.3) kg.m-2 , nine women, ASA physical status 1 (35%), 2 (55%), 3 (10%). While closed mouths and increasing flow rates demonstrated non-linear increases in pressure, the pressure increase was negligible with an open mouth. Airway pressures remained below 10 cmH2 O even with closed mouths and flow rates up to 80 l.min-1 ; they were not influenced by catheter position. This study shows an increase in airway pressures with closed mouths that depends on flow rate. The generated pressure is negligible with an open mouth. These data question positive airway pressure as an important mechanism for maintenance of oxygenation during apnoea.
© 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway management; airway physiology; apnoea; high-flow nasal therapy; oxygen

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32776518     DOI: 10.1111/anae.15224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

1.  [Is pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen safe? randomized control trial of 56 cases of elderly patients during induction of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation].

Authors:  Q Cai; W Ma; C Wu; H Liu; S Wang; G Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-07-20

2.  [Ultrasound assessment of gastric insufflation in obese patients receiving transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange during general anesthesia induction].

Authors:  Weiqing Jiang; Li Shi; Qian Zhao; Wenwen Zhang; Man Xu; Wanling Wang; Xiaoliang Wang; Hongguang Bao; Jing Leng; Li Jiang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-11-30

3.  Comparison of the effectiveness of high-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard facemask oxygenation for pre- and apneic oxygenation during anesthesia induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Li Song; Yan Sun; Yu-Bo Shi; Xiao-Ying Liu; Zhen-Bo Su
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  A propensity score-adjusted analysis of efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen during awake tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Min-Soo Kim; So Yeon Kim; In Kyung Min; Wyun Kon Park; Sei Han Song; Dongkwan Shin; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Riedel; Fabian Bürgi; Robert Greif; Heiko Kaiser; Thomas Riva; Lorenz Theiler; Sabine Nabecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  THRIVE: five years on and into the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Anika Sud; Anil Patel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 9.166

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.