Literature DB >> 32775785

Radiation for Glioblastoma in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Patient Selection and Hypofractionation to Maximize Benefit and Minimize Risk.

Sonal S Noticewala1, Ethan B Ludmir1, Andrew J Bishop1, Caroline Chung1, Amol J Ghia1, David Grosshans1, Susan McGovern1, Arnold de la Cruz Paulino1, Chenyang Wang1, Kristina D Woodhouse1, Debra N Yeboa1, Sujit S Prabhu2, Shiao-Pei Weathers3, Prajnan Das1, Albert C Koong1, Mary Frances McAleer1, Jing Li1.   

Abstract

We describe the institutional guidelines of a major tertiary cancer center with regard to using hypofractionated radiation regimens to treat glioblastoma as a measure to minimize exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) while not sacrificing clinical outcomes. Our guidelines review level one evidence of various hypofractionated regimens, and recommend a multidisciplinary approach while balancing the risk of morbidity and mortality among individuals at high risk for severe illness from COVID-19 infection. We also briefly outline strategies our department is taking in mitigating risk among our cancer patients undergoing radiation.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32775785      PMCID: PMC7251361          DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2452-1094


In the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, minimizing the risk of exposure for both patients and health care personnel is critical. Early data suggest that patients with cancer are particularly susceptible to severe illness due to COVID-19. Delivering a course of radiation therapy (RT) involves multiple person-to-person interactions at the individual level over many weeks, including between patients, physicians, nurses, radiation therapists, physicists, and others. Thus, many radiation oncology facilities are identifying measures to reduce exposure of patients and providers to COVID-19. Therefore, radiation oncologists are revisiting the role of hypofractionated RT regimens to decrease treatment time and exposure for all involved. To that end, our central nervous system working group at a large tertiary cancer care center has drafted guidance for selecting patients with glioblastoma (GBM) who would benefit from hypofractionated RT in the era of COVID-19 (Fig 1).
Figure 1

Algorithm of Radiation Guidelines for GBM during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic at MD Anderson Cancer Center: Radiation recommendations regarding GBM in asymptomatic, COVID-19 negative, and/or patients not requiring self-quarantine at a major tertiary cancer center. ∗: Healthcare guidelines during COVID-19 pandemic are dynamic and application of the guidelines outlined should be in accordance with local institutional, state, and federal guidelines. Consider travel restrictions for new patients and use of a telemedicine platform to monitor patients for side-effects while on treatment. #: recommend multidisciplinary discussion with radiation oncology, neuro-oncology regarding systemic therapy, and neurosurgery. ≠: In patients who have tested COVID-19 negative, we recommend re-testing if the index of suspicion for COVID-19 infection is high. If a patient becomes COVID-19 positive during RT, we recommend holding RT until the patient self-quarantines for 14 days after positive test date. The patient is then screened for symptoms after completion of self-quarantine and the patient’s case undergoes multidisciplinary review to determine if he/she can resume RT. ¥: consider 60 Gy in 30 fractions with excellent performance status and without high risk CDC identified COVID-19 comorbidities. π: consider risk/benefits of hypofractionated RT if patient has the following uncontrolled comorbidities as identified by the CDC: chronic lung disease, moderate to severe asthma, serious heart conditions, immunocompromised, severe obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis, liver disease. Abbreviations: CDC = Center for Disease Control and Prevention; GBM = Glioblastoma; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Status; RT = Radiation treatment; TMZ = Temozolamide.

Algorithm of Radiation Guidelines for GBM during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic at MD Anderson Cancer Center: Radiation recommendations regarding GBM in asymptomatic, COVID-19 negative, and/or patients not requiring self-quarantine at a major tertiary cancer center. ∗: Healthcare guidelines during COVID-19 pandemic are dynamic and application of the guidelines outlined should be in accordance with local institutional, state, and federal guidelines. Consider travel restrictions for new patients and use of a telemedicine platform to monitor patients for side-effects while on treatment. #: recommend multidisciplinary discussion with radiation oncology, neuro-oncology regarding systemic therapy, and neurosurgery. ≠: In patients who have tested COVID-19 negative, we recommend re-testing if the index of suspicion for COVID-19 infection is high. If a patient becomes COVID-19 positive during RT, we recommend holding RT until the patient self-quarantines for 14 days after positive test date. The patient is then screened for symptoms after completion of self-quarantine and the patient’s case undergoes multidisciplinary review to determine if he/she can resume RT. ¥: consider 60 Gy in 30 fractions with excellent performance status and without high risk CDC identified COVID-19 comorbidities. π: consider risk/benefits of hypofractionated RT if patient has the following uncontrolled comorbidities as identified by the CDC: chronic lung disease, moderate to severe asthma, serious heart conditions, immunocompromised, severe obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis, liver disease. Abbreviations: CDC = Center for Disease Control and Prevention; GBM = Glioblastoma; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Status; RT = Radiation treatment; TMZ = Temozolamide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, patients aged ≥65 years and those with uncontrolled comorbidities (primarily cardiopulmonary conditions; Fig. 1) are considered at risk for severe illness from COVID-19. Based on these risk factors, we recommend that patients aged ≥65 years with GBM who present for first-course RT should strongly be considered for hypofractionated RT regimens, in particular 40 Gy in 15 fractions, as supported by phase 3 data (Fig 1)., Special considerations can be made if these older patients have excellent performance status (PS) and are without major medical comorbidities. For patients age <65 years with good PS (Karnofsky PS ≥70), we continue to favor standard fractionation with 60 Gy in 30 fractions. However, individualized risk/benefit considerations should be made for younger patients, even those with a satisfactory PS, if they have risk factors associated with increased COVID-related morbidity and mortality as identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This can be made in a shared decision-making model with patients (Fig 1). Together, for patients who present for first-course RT in the treatment of GBM, our algorithm broadly favors the use of hypofractionated RT, halving the total treatment delivery time for many patients with GBM. For patients with very poor PS (Karnofsky PS <50), palliative regimens of either 34 Gy in 10 fractions or 25 Gy in 5 fractions, each supported by prospective trial data, can be used for patients considered for first-course RT. Alternatively, best supportive care or temozolomide with the omission of RT is reasonable (Fig. 1). For patients with recurrent GBM, we do not generally recommend reirradiation, and instead favor consideration of systemic therapies if considered reasonable (Fig 1). These therapies may include, but are not limited to, temozolomide, bevacizumab, and lomustine. Within our department, a daily multidisciplinary group provides guidance to radiation oncologists on decision making given the rapidly changing evidence and protocols in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This group assesses the appropriateness of safely delaying consultations or treatment, referring patients to local providers as indicated, utilization of telemedicine, and handling of COVID-19-positive patients who require RT. Given the aggressive nature of GBM, we recommend that patients who are asymptomatic, COVID-19-negative, and do not meet the criteria for self-quarantine receive RT in a manner that decreases exposure without compromising clinical outcomes as outlined (Fig 1). For patients who test negative for COVID-19, we recommend retesting if the index of suspicion for COVID-19 infection remains high given reports of high false-negative rates (approximately 30%) with current COVID-19 testing. If a patient tests positive for COVID-19 during RT, we recommend holding RT until the patient self-quarantines for 14 days after the positive test date. The patient is then screened for symptoms after completion of the self-quarantine and the patient’s case undergoes multidisciplinary review to determine whether they can resume RT. Since there is no vaccine, standardized therapy, known immunity, or cure for COVID-19, the rationale for holding oncologic treatment for patients with GBM who test positive for COVID-19 is multifactorial, including known adverse outcomes of individuals with a cancer diagnosis and COVID-19 infection, increased risk of exposure of other COVID-19 negative individuals (other immunocompromised patients with cancer, RT providers, and front-line staff), or depletion of limited personal protective equipment resources. Thus, we believe the decision to resume RT in a clinically recovered, COVID-19-positive patient with an anticipated life expectancy >6 months would require self-quarantine for 14 days after the test date, no COVID-19–related symptoms after self-quarantine, and multidisciplinary panel review of the patient’s case to determine risk-to-benefit ratio of proceeding with oncologic therapy with consideration of hypofractionated RT as clinically feasible. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to impact oncologic management in a lasting way, and the recommendations provided herein may evolve over time. Other institutions should consider implementing these guidelines in accordance with local institutional, state, and federal regulations and with multidisciplinary discussions with radiation oncology, neurooncology, and neurosurgery. Collectively, we believe these recommendations allow for safe, effective, and expedient RT for patients with GBM in the era of COVID-19.
  6 in total

1.  Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Annika Malmström; Bjørn Henning Grønberg; Christine Marosi; Roger Stupp; Didier Frappaz; Henrik Schultz; Ufuk Abacioglu; Björn Tavelin; Benoit Lhermitte; Monika E Hegi; Johan Rosell; Roger Henriksson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  International Atomic Energy Agency Randomized Phase III Study of Radiation Therapy in Elderly and/or Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Wilson Roa; Lucyna Kepka; Narendra Kumar; Valery Sinaika; Juliana Matiello; Darejan Lomidze; Dalenda Hentati; Douglas Guedes de Castro; Katarzyna Dyttus-Cebulok; Suzanne Drodge; Sunita Ghosh; Branislav Jeremić; Eduardo Rosenblatt; Elena Fidarova
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Short-Course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma.

Authors:  James R Perry; Normand Laperriere; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Alba A Brandes; Johan Menten; Claire Phillips; Michael Fay; Ryo Nishikawa; J Gregory Cairncross; Wilson Roa; David Osoba; John P Rossiter; Arjun Sahgal; Hal Hirte; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Enrico Franceschi; Olivier Chinot; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Laura Fariselli; Antje Wick; Loic Feuvret; Michael Back; Michael Tills; Chad Winch; Brigitta G Baumert; Wolfgang Wick; Keyue Ding; Warren P Mason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  W Roa; P M A Brasher; G Bauman; M Anthes; E Bruera; A Chan; B Fisher; D Fulton; S Gulavita; C Hao; S Husain; A Murtha; K Petruk; D Stewart; P Tai; R Urtasun; J G Cairncross; P Forsyth
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China.

Authors:  Wenhua Liang; Weijie Guan; Ruchong Chen; Wei Wang; Jianfu Li; Ke Xu; Caichen Li; Qing Ai; Weixiang Lu; Hengrui Liang; Shiyue Li; Jianxing He
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Awake craniotomy for glioblastoma in COVID-19-positive patients and delivering the standard of care: illustrative case.

Authors:  Reinier Alvarez; Rupesh Kotecha; Michael W McDermott; Vitaly Siomin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-07-05

2.  The impact of COVID-19 on a high-volume incident learning system: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Dustin J Jacqmin; Jennie S M Crosby
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 3.  Radiotherapy based management during Covid-19 pandemic - A systematic review of presented consensus and guidelines.

Authors:  Zahra Siavashpour; Neda Goharpey; Mosayyeb Mobasheri
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients and Staff in Radiation Oncology Departments in Belgium: A National Survey.

Authors:  Aude Vaandering; Selma Ben Mustapha; Maarten Lambrecht; Dirk Van Gestel; Liv Veldmeman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The COVID-19 Status of Patients Is an Essential Determinant for Decision-Making by Radiation Oncologists: A European Survey.

Authors:  Selma Ben Mustapha; Paolo Simoni; Nadège Dubois; Nicolas Jansen; Ferenc Lakosi; Antonio Silva Mota; Sara Ramella; Philippe Coucke
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-04

6.  Trends in Radiation Oncology Treatment Fractionation at a Single Academic Center, 2010 to 2020.

Authors:  Benjamin A Y Cher; Michael Dykstra; Chang Wang; Matthew Schipper; James A Hayman; Charles S Mayo; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22

7.  Palliative radiotherapy indications during the COVID-19 pandemic and in future complex logistic settings: the NORMALITY model.

Authors:  Francesco Cellini; Rossella Di Franco; Stefania Manfrida; Valentina Borzillo; Ernesto Maranzano; Stefano Pergolizzi; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Vincenzo Fusco; Francesco Deodato; Mario Santarelli; Fabio Arcidiacono; Romina Rossi; Sara Reina; Anna Merlotti; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Angelo Tozzi; Giambattista Siepe; Alberto Cacciola; Elvio Russi; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Marta Scorsetti; Umberto Ricardi; Renzo Corvò; Vittorio Donato; Paolo Muto; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.