| Literature DB >> 32775202 |
Huan Yu1,2, Fangda Fu1, Sai Yao1, Huan Luo3, Taotao Xu1,2, Hongting Jin1,2, Peijian Tong1,2, Di Chen2,4, Chengliang Wu1,2, Hongfeng Ruan1,2,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to introduce and validate a metal-free, reproducible and reliable mouse model of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) surgery as an effective tool for a better understanding of molecular mechanisms of graft-tunnel healing after ACLR.Entities:
Keywords: ACL, Anterior cruciate ligament; ACLR, ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; BMD, Bone mineral density; BV/TV, Bone volume/total volume; CI, Confidence interval; CT, Computed tomography; Gli1, Glioma-associated oncogene homologue 1; Gli2, Glioma-associated oncogene homologue 2; Gli3, Glioma-associated oncogene homologue 3; H&E, Haematoxylin-eosin; Hedgehog signaling; Ihh, Indian hedgehog; Mouse model; NS, Non-significant; Ptch1, Patched1; Smo, Smoothened; Tendon-bone healing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32775202 PMCID: PMC7390781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Fig. 1Diagram of animal treatment and study design of the project.
Fig. 2Murine modified ACLR procedures. (A) Following the exposure of the lateral capsule and ACL of the right knee joint. (B) a bone tunnel is created in the anterior portion of the proximal tibia and lateral femoral condyle using a 25-gauge needle. (C, D) A flexor digitorum longus tendon graft is harvested through a small incision in the leg and the plantar aspect of the foot, respectively. (E) The tendon graft was pulled through the tibial and femoral tunnels in turn. (F) After the exposure of the lateral head of gastrocnemius, (G) the proximal end of the graft passed through the femoral tunnel (H) were further tied around the lateral head of gastrocnemius, while the distal end of the graft was fixed in the tibial side by transosseous suture. (I) Hand drawing illustrates the specific fixation method of graft in the femoral side. (J) Illustration of the primary ALCR model as previously described.
Fig. 3Micro-CT analysis results. (A) Representative transverse, sagittal and coronal aspects of micro-CT slices of bone tunnel following ACLR. The yellow circle with a diameter of 0.5 mm is equal to the diameter of the needle used to drill the tunnel. (B) Box plots show BV/TV and (C) BMD of newly formed bone in full-length of the femoral and tibial tunnels of mice in Group 3, 4 and 5. The horizontal line is the median, the box represents the first quartile and third quartile, and the bars represent the minimum and maximum. BV/TV, bone volume/total volume fraction; BMD, bone mineral density. (For interpretation of the references to color/colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 4Biomechanical analysis results. (A) Specimens are fixed into the testing apparatus. The ACL graft or the intact ACL is the only tissue connecting the femur and the tibia. (B) Load-to-failure force and (C) graft stiffness results of mice in Group 1–5. (D) The site of graft failure in Group 1–5. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; n.s., nonsignificant.
Fig. 5Histological staining results. (A–J) Safranin O staining results of transverse sections of tibial tunnels in each Group. Normal transverse section of trabecular bone in tibia (A, F). There is no junction observed between graft and tunnel of mice in Group 2 (B, G). No obvious junction forms between graft and tunnel of mice in Group 3 (C, H). And direct junction appeared between tendon graft and the tunnel of mice in Group 4 (D, I) and 5 (E, J). Red arrows in I and J indicate a direct junction of graft to bone tunnel. Boxed area in A-E is shown at high magnification in F-J, respectively. Scale bars = 200 μm in A-E; Scale bars = 50 μm in F-J. B: bone; G: graft; IF: interface. (For interpretation of the references to color/colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 6H&E staining results of tibial tunnel. (A–J) H&E staining results of tibial tunnel near the tibial growth plate of mice knee in each Group. Continuous collagen fibers from ACL to tibial bone were observed in Group 1(A, F). Disorganized fibrovascular granulation tissue formed in Group 3 mice (C, H) and well-organized graft-tunnel interface appeared in Group 4 (D, I) and 5 (E,J). Red arrows in A-E indicate the position of the growth plate. Boxed area in A-E is shown at high magnification in F-J, respectively. (K–T) H&E staining results of bone tunnel near the tibial aperture of mice in each Group. Native enthesis showed continuous collagen fibers connection (K, P). No fibrovascular tissue was seen at the interface in Group 2 (L, Q). Less fibrovascular tissue existed on the tunnel side in Group 3 (M, R). Mass formation of fibrovascular granulation tissue appeared at the tendon-bone interface of mice in Group 4 (N, S) and 5 (O, T). Boxed area with black frame in row 1 and 3 of the illustrations was shown at high magnification in row 2 and 4, respectively. Scale bars = 400 μm in A-E; Scale bars = 200 μm in F-J, P-T; Scale bars = 50 μm in K–O. B, bone; G, graft; IF, interface. (For interpretation of the references to color/colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 7IHC results of key proteins in Ihh signaling at the tendon-bone interface in Group 1–5 mice. (A–E) Expression of Ihh, Ptch1, Smo, Gli2, Gli3 proteins at the tendon-bone interface. (F) IHC semi-quantitative expression results of key proteins in Ihh signaling using H-score at the tendon-bone interface in Group 1–5 mice. The H-score ranged from 0 to 300 was used for semi-quantitative assessment of IHC images according to both the intensity of staining and the percentage of cells stained. The intensity was considered 0 for absent expression, 1+ for weak staining, 2+ for moderate staining, and 3+ for strong staining. The H-score was calculated as the formula: H-score = 1 × percentage of 1+ cells +2 × percentage of 2+ cells +3 × percentage of 3+ cells. Scale bars = 50 μm. Data are expressed as the Mean ± S.D. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; n.s. indicates no significant difference.