| Literature DB >> 32774654 |
Belinda Ijeoma Ikpoh1, Allen Kunselman2, Christy Stetter2, Michael Chen1,3,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: corneal transplantation is a surgical procedure requiring consistent long-term follow-up to maximize the chance of graft survival. The purpose of this study was to explore patient characteristics and reasons for being lost to follow-up (LTFU).Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Follow-up; Kenya; appointment adherence; compliance; cornea; corneal transplantation; penetrating keratoplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32774654 PMCID: PMC7392857 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.95.19993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1reasons for loss to follow-up
patient characteristics associated with loss to follow-up
| Category | Characteristic | LTFU/Total Patients (LTFU %) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 60+ | 9/16 (56.3%) | 3.78 (1.21, 11.80) | 0.02 |
| <18 | 15/39 (38.5%) | 1.84 (0.78, 4.33) | 0.17 | |
| 18-59 | 16/63 (25.4%) | Ref | ||
| Gender | Female | 14/41 (34.1%) | 1.02 (0.46, 2.26) | 0.97 |
| Male | 26/77 (33.8%) | Ref | ||
| Hours from hospital* | >4 | 18/44 (40.9%) | 2.20 (0.89, 5.45) | 0.09 |
| ≥4 | 11/46 (23.9%) | Ref | ||
| Transport Fare* | >600 Kenyan shillings | 15/39 (38.5%) | 1.56 (0.62, 3.96) | 0.35 |
| ≥600 Kenyan shillings | 12/42 (28.6%) | Ref | ||
| Preoperative Diagnosis** | Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy | 8/13 (61.5%) | 3.83 (1.13, 12.94) | 0.03 |
| Corneal scar | 8/26 (30.8%) | 1.06 (0.41, 2.79) | 0.90 | |
| Keratoconus | 23/78 (29.5%) | Ref | ||
| Preoperative visual acuity of contralateral eye | <6/18 | 27/72 (37.5%) | 1.52 (0.68, 3.39) | 0.30 |
| ≤6/18 | 13/46 (28.3%) | Ref | ||
| Nairobi Resident | No | 30/91 (33.0%) | 1.28 (0.42, 3.92) | 0.67 |
| Yes | 5/18 (27.8%) | Ref | ||
| Education Level*** | Other | 12/30 (40.0%) | 2.58 (0.89, 7.51) | 0.08 |
| Completed college or university education | 8/39 (20.5%) | Ref | ||
| Occupation Level*** | Unemployed | 6/12 (50.0%) | 3.14 (0.87, 11.32) | 0.08 |
| Student or employed | 14/58 (24.1%) | Ref | ||
| Adverse Events | No | 24/70 (34.3%) | 1.04 (0.48, 2.27) | 0.92 |
| Yes | 16/48 (33.3%) | Ref | ||
| Mobile Contact Number | No | 5/8 (62.5%) | 3.57 (0.81, 15.79) | 0.09 |
| Yes | 35/110 (31.8%) | Ref | ||
| Satisfaction with Surgery | No/unsure/refused to answer | 6/14 (42.9%) | 1.83 (0.58, 5.79) | 0.30 |
| Yes | 27/93 (29.0%) | Ref |
CI = confidence interval. Ref = reference group. P-value < 0.05 is statistically significant. * Categories are based on the median; Nairobi residents excluded ** One patient with diagnosis of chemical injury was excluded *** Patients 17 and younger were excluded