Literature DB >> 32774117

Rate of re-positive RT-PCR test among patients recovered from COVID-19.

Parham Habibzadeh1, Mohammad M Sajadi2, Amir Emami3, Mohammad Hossein Karimi4, Mahboobeh Yadollahie5, Maryam Kucheki5, Sahar Akbarpoor6, Farrokh Habibzadeh5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; RT-PCR; laboratory test

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32774117      PMCID: PMC7394260          DOI: 10.11613/BM.2020.030401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)        ISSN: 1330-0962            Impact factor:   2.313


× No keyword cloud information.
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is the most important laboratory test we currently rely on for the diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). There is no effective treatment or vaccine for COVID-19 (). One option proposed to save lives is to use convalescent plasma obtained from recovered patients (). There are reports that recovered patients may carry the whole virus and/or viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) (RT-PCR-positive) for long periods (, ). Recently, health care officials in Larestan (Iran) decided to use the convalescent plasma to treat newly infected patients. They asked 35 patients with confirmed COVID-19 who had been hospitalized in Larestan Hospital during March 22 to March 26, 2020, to donate plasma. The diagnosis was made by RT-PCR according to a method described earlier (). The RNA was extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs (Invitrogen ChargeSwitch Total RNA Cell Kit, Invitrogen Co, USA). The assay tested the E and RdRP genes (). Both internal and negative controls were performed for tests. Thirteen of the 35 invited patients did agree to donate. They were thus re-tested with RT-PCR (using the same method) to determine if they were RT-PCR-negative. The study protocol was approved by the Petroleum Industry Health Organization Institutional Review Board. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test was positive in 9 (5 male, 4 female) of 13 recovered patients. They had a median age of 52 (interquartile range (IQR) 30 to 56) years. They presented mostly with cough, fever, malaise, and dyspnoea. On admission, 6 had abnormal findings in their chest and mediastinal unenhanced spiral computed tomography, including ground-glass opacities with or without consolidation; 4 had a positive C-reactive protein test; and 5 had 1 or 2 underlying medical conditions, most commonly hypertension (4 of 5). The disease severity was mild to moderate. The patients were hospitalized for a median of 5 (IQR 3 to 10) days. During hospitalization, they received osteltamivir (75 mg taken orally every 12 hours) and/or lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg taken orally every 12 hours). They were discharged home when their symptoms resolved completely. Other laboratory parameters measured at the time of admission were within normal limits (Table 1). The second RT-PCR test was found positive in these patients after a median of 29 (range 22 to 54) days after initiation of their symptoms/illness and 18 (range 15 to 48) days after complete resolution of their symptoms.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics at hospital admission in 9 studied patients

ParameterMedian (IQR)
Body mass index (kg/m2)26.5 (22.8–29.0)
Haemoglobin (g/L)141 (129–168)
White blood cell count (x109/L)4.4 (3.9–5.3)
Absolute lymphocyte count (x109/L)1.77 (1.38–2.17)
Platelet (x109/L)172 (129–201)
Serum creatinine (μmol/L)88 (88–115)
Serum sodium (mmol/L)143 (139–145)
Serum potassium (mmol/L)3.5 (3.3–4.0)
Serum bicarbonate (mmol/L)23.8 (22.7–25.4)
Arterial pH7.39 (7.34–7.42)
Arterial pCO2 (kPa)5.5 (5.1–5.9)
IQR – interquartile range.
Observing 9 positive RT-PCR tests in 13 recovered patients after a median of 18 days of complete resolution of their symptoms – a positive rate of almost 70% – is very high. Even if we assume that all the remaining invited (but unattended) 22 recovered patients would have tested negative, the rate was still high – 26% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11% to 41%). Considering the low sensitivity (high false-negative rate) of RT-PCR test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in nasopharyngeal samples, this rate would clearly be an underestimation (). On account of the low sample size studied, the results might be considered trivial, at the first glance; however, even the lower limit of the 95% CI of the rate, 11%, is unacceptably high and potentially dangerous. This high RT-PCR re-positive rate would have serious health implications in the world and might even change our strategies to tackle with the current pandemic. These patients, although asymptomatic, can potentially spread the virus after more than 2 weeks (even 48 days) of complete resolution of their symptoms. It is, however, worth to note that RT-PCR does not discriminate between intact whole virus and viral RNA. Therefore, a positive test does not necessarily imply an active infection or ability to transmit infection. This underlines the importance of developing tests to detect active viral replication and employing an active surveillance for identifying those infected with the virus, even asymptomatic people.
  5 in total

1.  Testing an Old Therapy Against a New Disease: Convalescent Plasma for COVID-19.

Authors:  Rita Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered From COVID-19.

Authors:  Lan Lan; Dan Xu; Guangming Ye; Chen Xia; Shaokang Wang; Yirong Li; Haibo Xu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The Novel Coronavirus: A Bird's Eye View.

Authors:  Parham Habibzadeh; Emily K Stoneman
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 4.  Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure.

Authors:  Lauren M Kucirka; Stephen A Lauer; Oliver Laeyendecker; Denali Boon; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01
  5 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Human Identical Sequences, hyaluronan, and hymecromone ─ the new mechanism and management of COVID-19.

Authors:  Shuai Yang; Ying Tong; Lu Chen; Wenqiang Yu
Journal:  Mol Biomed       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Is recurrence possible in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Case series and systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Anna Gidari; Marco Nofri; Luca Saccarelli; Sabrina Bastianelli; Samuele Sabbatini; Silvia Bozza; Barbara Camilloni; Igino Fusco-Moffa; Claudia Monari; Edoardo De Robertis; Antonella Mencacci; Daniela Francisci
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Nucleic acid and antibody assay results in Chinese patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Yong Lu; Yongyan Li; Yiping Wang; Jianping Luo; Wanjun Yu
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.932

4.  Molecular diagnostic assays for COVID-19: an overview.

Authors:  Parham Habibzadeh; Mohammad Mofatteh; Mohammad Silawi; Saeid Ghavami; Mohammad Ali Faghihi
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.250

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of discharged COVID-19 patients retesting positive for RT-PCR.

Authors:  Xiangying Ren; Xiangge Ren; Jiaao Lou; Yongbo Wang; Qiao Huang; Yuexian Shi; Yuqing Deng; Xiaoyan Li; Liye Lu; Siyu Yan; Yunyun Wang; Lisha Luo; Xiantao Zeng; Xiaomei Yao; Yinghui Jin
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-04-17

Review 6.  The mystery of COVID-19 reinfections: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rubaid Azhar Dhillon; Mohammad Aadil Qamar; Jaleed Ahmed Gilani; Omar Irfan; Usama Waqar; Mir Ibrahim Sajid; Syed Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-12-04

7.  Liver Biomarkers Assay in COVID-19 Cases: A Comparison Study between Alive and Dead Patients.

Authors:  Amir Emami; Fatemeh Javanmardi; Ali Akbari; Babak Shirazi Yeganeh; Tahereh Rezaei; Hamid Bakhtiari; Neda Pirbonyeh
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 8.  Reinfection or Reactivation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiujuan Tang; Salihu S Musa; Shi Zhao; Daihai He
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 9.  Recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in recovered COVID-19 patients: a narrative review.

Authors:  Thi Loi Dao; Van Thuan Hoang; Philippe Gautret
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Probable Causes and Risk Factors for Positive SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Recovered Patients: Evidence From Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Lei Luo; Dan Liu; Zhoubin Zhang; Zhihao Li; Chaojun Xie; Zhenghe Wang; Zongqiu Chen; Peidong Zhang; Xiru Zhang; Yujie Zhang; Wenfang Zhong; Wenting Zhang; Pei Yang; Qingmei Huang; Weiqi Song; Hui Wang; Chen Mao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.