Literature DB >> 32773834

Virtual Versus Paper-based Cases in Reinforcing the Collect and Assess Elements of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.

Jonathan S Newsome1, Takova D Wallace-Gay1, Osama A Shoair1.   

Abstract

Objective. To compare pharmacy students' perceptions about and performance when using paper-based versus virtual patient cases to reinforce knowledge of the collect and assess elements of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP). Methods. Twenty-seven pharmacy students enrolled in an ambulatory care elective course were randomized to receive either paper-based cases or virtual patient cases for three weeks. They then crossed over to receive the alternative case format for the next three weeks. Each student received a score for their performance on questions related to the collect and assess elements of the PPCP. Students completed a survey and participated in a focus group to evaluate their perceptions of each learning method. Statistical analyses were performed on all data collected. Results. Students' performance (n=27) was better on the assess questions of the PPCP when they used paper-based patient cases than when they used virtual patient cases. The only difference in students' perceptions was related to the collect element, as students favored using paper-based patient cases over virtual patient cases when collecting subjective and objective information. Students who participated in the focus groups believed that the virtual patient cases provided a more realistic and engaging experience in addition to promoting critical thinking. Conclusion. While paper-based patient cases allowed pharmacy students to quickly identify and "collect" relevant information, increased use of virtual patient cases may enhance students' comfort level with and ability to "assess" actual patients.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active learning; focus groups; perceptions; pharmacists’ patient care process; virtual patient cases

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32773834      PMCID: PMC7405293          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  7 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Promotion of self-directed learning using virtual patient cases.

Authors:  Neal Benedict; Kristine Schonder; James McGee
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Online virtual-patient cases versus traditional problem-based learning in advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Sara Al-Dahir; Kendrea Bryant; Kathleen B Kennedy; Donna S Robinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Use of virtual patients in an advanced therapeutics pharmacy course to promote active, patient-centered learning.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Rima A Mohammad; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Virtual Patient Case Sharing Across Two Schools of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Laura A Siemianowski; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Impact of a Paper vs Virtual Simulated Patient Case on Student-Perceived Confidence and Engagement.

Authors:  Susanne G Barnett; Casey E Gallimore; Michael Pitterle; Josh Morrill
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Use of a fictitious community-based virtual teaching platform to aid in the teaching of pharmacy practice skills: Student perspectives after initial implementation.

Authors:  Louise E Curley; Maureen McDonald; Trudi Aspden
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2016-09-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.