Literature DB >> 32773267

Titanium Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Good to Excellent Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Metal Allergy Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.

Riccardo D'Ambrosi1, Alessandro Nuara2, Ilaria Mariani3, Fabrizio Di Feo1, Nicola Ursino1, Michael Hirschmann4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main purpose of the present study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with positive skin patch tests who underwent medial mobile-bearing titanium niobium nitride unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during a mid-term follow-up.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with positive skin patch tests were included in this prospective study. The clinical evaluation consisted of Oxford Knee Score and Knee Society Score (KSS) reports. Each patient was clinically evaluated the day before surgery (T0) as well as at T1 (11.9 ± 1.3 months) and during the final follow-up T2 (67.2 ± 19.1 months). The positioning of the UKA was evaluated during the final follow-up using standardized radiographs (T2: 67.2 ± 19.1 months).
RESULTS: Oxford and KSS ranged from a respective mean preoperative value of 23.0 ± 2.7 and 51.5 ± 5.0 to 42.1 ± 1.7 and 87.6 ± 2.2, respectively, at T1 (P < .001) and to the final values of 45.0 ± 1.9 and 91.9 ± 3.4, respectively, at T2 (P < .001 both vs T1 and T2). At T2, the mean femoral angle was 7.0° ± 4.5°, mean tibial angle was 3.0° ± 2.1°, and mean tibial slope was 5.1° ± 3.2°. A significant difference was found between KSS and Oxford with ANOVA for repeated measures over time (P < .001). The Oxford and KSS scores showed significant improvements during each follow-up. No complications were found, and not a single patient required a revision surgery during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: The hypoallergenic titanium niobium nitride mobile-bearing UKA showed comparable results to standard CoCr UKA regardless of the gender, age, BMI, and implant size of metal allergy patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Careful patient selection processes and accurate medical histories played key roles in the choice of hypersensitivity-friendly implants.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TiNbN; hypoallergenic; metal hypersensitivity; mobile bearing; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; unicondylar

Year:  2020        PMID: 32773267     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Nicola Ursino; Ilaria Mariani; Katia Corona; Filippo Maria Anghilieri; Emanuele Franchi; Lorenzo Monti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-29

2.  High tibial osteotomy with an external fixator or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for varus knee in young patients?

Authors:  Amit Kumar Yadav; Mangal Parihar; Ilaria Mariani; Riccardo Giorgino; Laura Mangiavini; Nicola Ursino; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-13

3.  No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Rafael Loucas; Marios Loucas; Riccardo Giorgino; Nicola Ursino; Giuseppe Maria Peretti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Single Condylar Knee Prosthesis When Treating Knee Single Compartment Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Case-Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Shaofeng Wang; Yang Wang; Jiong Wang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.