AIM: Australia utilises a selective ultrasound screening programme. The rate of late diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in Australia is increasing. The aim of this study is to quantify the treatment required and compare the 5-year radiological outcomes between early and late diagnosis in children with DDH with frank dislocation. METHODS: We performed a case-matched control study of children with frank DDH dislocations from 2000 to 2010 comparing three groups: children with an early diagnosis successfully treated in a Pavlik harness (SP), children with an early diagnosis who failed Pavlik harness treatment (FP) and children with a late diagnosis (LD). Minimum follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 115 hips were included. Patients in the LD group required significantly more open reductions (P < 0.001), acetabular osteotomies (P < 0.001) and femoral osteotomies (P < 0.001). LD was also associated with significantly higher rates of growth disturbance at 46.3%, compared to 20.6% in the FP group and 5% in the SP group (P < 0.001). Overall, there were excellent radiological outcomes in 58.5% of the LD group compared to 79.4% in the FP group and 100% in the SP group. CONCLUSION: In Australia, high rates of LD in DDH persist in the context of selective ultrasound screening. While good radiological outcomes are achievable, a significantly greater level of surgical intervention is required and this is associated with significantly higher rates of growth disturbance. Optimisation of screening in Australia is vital.
AIM: Australia utilises a selective ultrasound screening programme. The rate of late diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in Australia is increasing. The aim of this study is to quantify the treatment required and compare the 5-year radiological outcomes between early and late diagnosis in children with DDH with frank dislocation. METHODS: We performed a case-matched control study of children with frank DDH dislocations from 2000 to 2010 comparing three groups: children with an early diagnosis successfully treated in a Pavlik harness (SP), children with an early diagnosis who failed Pavlik harness treatment (FP) and children with a late diagnosis (LD). Minimum follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 115 hips were included. Patients in the LD group required significantly more open reductions (P < 0.001), acetabular osteotomies (P < 0.001) and femoral osteotomies (P < 0.001). LD was also associated with significantly higher rates of growth disturbance at 46.3%, compared to 20.6% in the FP group and 5% in the SP group (P < 0.001). Overall, there were excellent radiological outcomes in 58.5% of the LD group compared to 79.4% in the FP group and 100% in the SP group. CONCLUSION: In Australia, high rates of LD in DDH persist in the context of selective ultrasound screening. While good radiological outcomes are achievable, a significantly greater level of surgical intervention is required and this is associated with significantly higher rates of growth disturbance. Optimisation of screening in Australia is vital.