OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the potential of cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping to detect load-independent left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffness by histological confirmation. BACKGROUND: Accurate noninvasive diagnosis of LV diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. METHODS: Nineteen HFpEF patients (14 female, 65 ± 16 years of age) without primary cardiomyopathy were prospectively enrolled. Cine, late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance, and triple-slice T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence were performed at 3-T. Extracellular volume (ECV) was quantified from pre- and post-contrast T1 values of the blood and myocardium with hematocrit correction. LV stiffness constant (beta) was assessed by calculating the slope of the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship curve during vena cava occlusion. Biopsy samples were used for quantification of collagen volume fraction (CVF) and myocardial cell size. RESULTS: Six patients showed focal scar on late gadolinium enhancement. There was no significant difference in histological CVF between patients with and without focal myocardial scarring (p = 0.2). Septal ECV rather than native T1 was a better surrogate marker for detecting histological CVF (r = 0.54; p = 0.02, and r = 0.44; p = 0.06, respectively). Global native T1 and ECV, but not native T1 and ECV in the septal myocardium, correlated well with the beta of passive LV stiffness, and had similar ability for predicting LV stiffness to histological CVF (r = 0.54, 0.50, 0.53, all p < 0.05, respectively). When the beta ≥0.054 was considered as moderately increased LV stiffness, global native T1 ≥1,362 ms provided 88% sensitivity and 64% specificity with the C-statistic of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.56 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial native T1 provides comparable ability in predicting LV stiffness to ECV and histological CVF and may be useful for monitoring patients with HFpEF who have renal dysfunction, allergy to gadolinium, or wheezing that can simulate asthma. Our feasibility study shows the potential of native T1 to allow for insight of heterogeneous pathophysiology and better risk stratification of HFpEF.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the potential of cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping to detect load-independent left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffness by histological confirmation. BACKGROUND: Accurate noninvasive diagnosis of LV diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. METHODS: Nineteen HFpEF patients (14 female, 65 ± 16 years of age) without primary cardiomyopathy were prospectively enrolled. Cine, late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance, and triple-slice T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence were performed at 3-T. Extracellular volume (ECV) was quantified from pre- and post-contrast T1 values of the blood and myocardium with hematocrit correction. LV stiffness constant (beta) was assessed by calculating the slope of the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship curve during vena cava occlusion. Biopsy samples were used for quantification of collagen volume fraction (CVF) and myocardial cell size. RESULTS: Six patients showed focal scar on late gadolinium enhancement. There was no significant difference in histological CVF between patients with and without focal myocardial scarring (p = 0.2). Septal ECV rather than native T1 was a better surrogate marker for detecting histological CVF (r = 0.54; p = 0.02, and r = 0.44; p = 0.06, respectively). Global native T1 and ECV, but not native T1 and ECV in the septal myocardium, correlated well with the beta of passive LV stiffness, and had similar ability for predicting LV stiffness to histological CVF (r = 0.54, 0.50, 0.53, all p < 0.05, respectively). When the beta ≥0.054 was considered as moderately increased LV stiffness, global native T1 ≥1,362 ms provided 88% sensitivity and 64% specificity with the C-statistic of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.56 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial native T1 provides comparable ability in predicting LV stiffness to ECV and histological CVF and may be useful for monitoring patients with HFpEF who have renal dysfunction, allergy to gadolinium, or wheezing that can simulate asthma. Our feasibility study shows the potential of native T1 to allow for insight of heterogeneous pathophysiology and better risk stratification of HFpEF.
Authors: Alberico Del Torto; Andrea Igoren Guaricci; Francesca Pomarico; Marco Guglielmo; Laura Fusini; Francesco Monitillo; Daniela Santoro; Monica Vannini; Alexia Rossi; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Gianluca Pontone Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-09
Authors: Clement Lau; Mohamed M M Elshibly; Prathap Kanagala; Jeffrey P Khoo; Jayanth Ranjit Arnold; Sandeep Singh Hothi Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-18