Literature DB >> 32771054

Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: a retrospective study.

Bulent Gucyetmez1,2, Hakan Korkut Atalan3, Ibrahim Sertdemir4, Ulkem Cakir5, Lutfi Telci6,7,8.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32771054      PMCID: PMC7414262          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03215-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, high risk of thrombosis became a current issue, and d-dimer levels indicating fibrin degradation products (FDPs) in the plasma were found as a predictor for mortality [1, 2]. Although unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) decrease the production of FDPs by inhibiting factors Xa and II, they cannot contribute metabolization of existing FDPs. Furthermore, FDPs cannot be filtered by known cytokine filters because of their molecular weight (minimum 240 kDa) [3, 4]. Yet, FDPs can be removed by therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) [5]. Therefore, recently, three consecutive TPE sessions were performed in selected patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care units (ICUs) after the assessment of their clinical and coagulation status. In the study, the effect of TPE on outcomes was retrospectively investigated in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. All COVID-19 patients admitted to 5 different tertiary ICUs between 10 March and 10 May 2020 were evaluated, and 73 of 91 patients were included in the study. The patients who died within the first 4 days and who were still in the ICUs on 10 May were excluded. According to the Turkish Health Minister Algorithm for COVID-19, all included patients received the same antiviral (favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin) therapy and anticoagulant prophylaxis (UFH infusion 100 mcg/kg or LMWH 0.01 mL/kg). Since two different protocols were used in 5 ICUs, patients with d-dimer ≥ 2 in 3 ICUs had only received therapeutic anticoagulation whereas patients with d-dimer ≥ 2 in the other 2 ICUs had received TPE plus therapeutic anticoagulation. In all ICUs, for all patients in GII, echocardiography, lower extremity venous Doppler, and, if pulmonary thrombosis suspected, thorax computerized tomography angiography were performed. After collecting data, 73 patients were divided into 2 groups as group I (GI) (d-dimer < 2 mg/L) and group II (GII) (d-dimer ≥ 2 mg/L), and then GII was also divided into 2 groups as GIIa (TPE+) and GIIb (TPE−). Patients’ characteristics, respiratory and laboratory parameters, and outcomes were recorded. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted on R v4.0.1 (0.2 caliper without replacement and nearest neighbor model, 1:1 ratio) by using 14 covariates (age, gender, CCI, APACHE II, SOFA score, lactate, leucocyte, lymphocyte, d-dimer and creatinine at the ICU admission, maximum respiratory support, the usage of steroid, IL-6 blocker, and cytokine filter). The total mortality rate was 27.4%. Mortality rates of GI and GII were 5% and 35.9%, respectively. In GII, major thromboembolic events were not detected in any patients. The median (min-max) day for the starting TPE was 3 (2–4). In GIIa, APACHE II, SOFA scores, d-dimer and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels at the ICU admission, and length of ICU stay were significantly higher than those of GI whereas mortality rates were similar in those groups (Table 1). The median values of the LOS-ICU in survivors and non-survivors in GII were 14 (6.5–21.5) and 15.5 (8–23), respectively (p = 0.630). In GIIa, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), d-dimer, ferritin, IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin levels were significantly decreased after three consecutive TPEs (Table 2). Furthermore, although ferritin level at the ICU admission was higher in GIIa, the mortality rate in both before and after PSM was higher in GIIb (45.7% and 58.3%) than in GIIa (16.7% and 8.3%) (p = 0.037, p = 0.009, respectively) (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparisons of patients groups

GI (d-dimer < 2) (n = 20)GII (d-dimer ≥ 2)
Before PSMAfter PSM
GIIa (TPE+) (n = 18)GIIb (TPE−) (n = 35)p1 (GI and GIIa)p2 (GIIa and GIIb)GIIa (TPE+) (n = 12)GIIb (TPE−) (n = 12)p2 (GIIa and GIIb)
Age (years)60 ± 1462 ± 1262 ± 150.6150.95161 ± 1464 ± 170.605
Male, n (%)13 (65.0)14 (77.8)26 (74.3)0.3860.7808 (66.7)8 (66.7)1.000
BMI (kg/m2)27.3 (5.8)27.9 (5.5)27.3 (6.6)0.2900.23728.5 (6.1)25.0 (6.6)0.078
CCI2.5 (4)3 (3)4 (3)0.9190.4223.0 ± 2.23.8 ± 1.70.270
At the ICU admission
 APACHE II12 ± 417 ± 417 ± 50.0020.88617 ± 3.317.5 ± 5.60.794
 SOFA Score5 (3)6 (1)7 (3)0.0020.2236 (2)6 (2)0.713
 PaO2/FiO2 ratio128 (68)97 (51)113 (79)0.2510.229108 (106)125 (103)0.551
 SpO2 (%)89 (5)91 (7)89 (5)0.3770.59792 (10)91 (5)0.590
 Lactate (mmol/L)1.4 (0.6)1.4 (0.7)1.4 (0.9)0.9880.6311.5 (0.8)1.3 (0.5)0.291
 WBC (×103/μL)9.6 (3.9)6.9 (6.4)8.2 (6.5)0.5730.3538.7 ± 4.97.4 ± 2.70.430
 Lymc (×103/μL)0.82 ± 0.400.80 ± 0.340.89 ± 0.420.5530.2710.83 ± 0.30.82 ± 0.50.963
d-dimer (mg/L)&1.2 (0.3–1.9)5.0 (2.1–35.2)7.2 (2.1–35.5)< 0.0010.1514.5 (2.1–35.2)6.0 (2.2–32.2)0.514
 Ferritin (ng/mL)1015 (1735)1735 (1853)900 (1454)0.1580.0181742 (2117)605 (1346)0.012
 IL-6 (pg/mL)&28.3 (5.3–1418)(8)134 (36.2–2958)(13)254 (33–5233)(13)0.0360.101155 (39.6–2958)(8)237 (33–4885)(4)0.933
 CRP (mg/dL)18.6 ± 10.922.2 ± 12.127.8 ± 10.40.3400.08619.2 ± 10.324.0 ± 11.00.275
 Creatinine (mg/dL)0.88 (0.29)0.87 (0.37)0.99 (0.82)0.8740.0510.91 ± 0.30.90 ± 0.30.944
 Urea (mg/dL)28 (29)32 (19)36 (26)0.9420.28828 (32)35 (14)0.291
 Number of damaged lobes, n (%)&3 (2–4)3 (2–5)3 (2–5)0.1490.1183 (2–5)3 (3–5)0.671
In the first 48 h
 Breath rate/min (max)34 (6)33 (9)33 (5)0.9880.71333 (11)33 (5)0.590
 PaO2/FiO2 ratio (min)117 ± 4298 ± 30105 ± 340.0870.376104 ± 32.4120 ± 32.50.235
 FiO2 (%) (max)75 (48)80 (30)80 (35)0.0820.96980 (25)80 (30)0.799
 PEEP (cmH2O) (max)12 (6)12 (4)14 (4)0.5020.05612.0 ± 2.313.0 ± 1.90.215
 Cdyn (ml/cmH2O) (min)44 (6)37 (12)41 (8)0.0030.05836.3 ± 6.639.5 ± 7.00.265
In the first week
 WBC (×103/μL) (max)13.2 (5.8)11.0 (8.9)12.6 (6.6)0.0770.08610.4 (10.3)11.0 (6.7)0.590
 WBC (×103/μL) (min)5.9 (2)6.3 (4)4.9 (4)0.7180.6126.7 (4.4)4.6 (1.5)0.219
 Lymc (×103/μL) (min)0.48 (0.40)0.5 (0.28)0.49 (0.46)0.9190.5730.52 (0.29)0.45 (0.28)0.551
 NLCR (max)16.4 (16.2)15 (8)11 (11)0.4600.51713.6 (10.1)11.6 (11.5)0.843
 Lactate (mmol/L) (max)2.1 (0.7)2.4 (1.1)2.4 (0.8)0.0870.9552.3 (1.0)2.4 (1.6)0.347
 Fluid balance (mL)3670 (3198)4552 (2973)3849 (2196)0.8740.4414174 ± 29075331 ± 31700.361
 Total fluid (mL/kg/day)40.7 (9.3)44.3 (15.5)44.8 (11)0.6960.91044.8 ± 13.548.7 ± 12.00.460
Respiratory support (max), n (%)
 IMV13 (65.0)16 (88.8)30 (85.7)0.0840.74611 (91.7)12 (100)0.307
 NIMV3 (15.0)1 (5.6)3 (8.6)0.3440.6941 (8.3)00.307
 HFOT4 (20.0)1 (5.6)2 (5.7)0.1880.98100NA
Additional therapies, n (%)
 Cytokine filters1 (5.0)3 (16.7)3 (8.1)0.4270.4342 (16.7)1 (8.3)0.592
 IL-6 blocker12 (60.0)9 (50.0)20 (57.1)0.5360.6217 (58.3)6 (50)0.682
 Steroids11 (55.0)10 (55.6)20 (57.1)0.3570.9127 (58.3)7 (58.3)1.000
 Duration of IMV (h)&168 (0–816)286 (0–1008)192 (0–720)0.1 120.067316 ± 271278 ± 1390.671
 AKI, n (%)7 (35.0)6 (33.3)19 (54.3)0.9140.1483 (25)6 (50)0.206
 Tracheotomized patients, n (%)2 (10.0)2 (11.1)1 (2.9)0.9110.2181 (8.3)0 (0)0.307
 LOS-ICU, (days)&12 (6–34)20 (5–42)11 (7–35)0.0170.00320 ± 1014 ± 50.067
 Mortality, n (%)1 (5.0)3 (16.7)16 (45.7)0.2420.0371 (8.3)7 (58.3)0.009

AKI acute kidney injury, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, BMI body mass index, CCI Charlson comorbidity index, C dynamic compliance, CRP C-reactive protein, HFOT high-flow oxygen therapy, ICU intensive care unit, IL-6 interleukin-6, IMV invasive mechanical ventilation, LOS length of stay, Lymc lymphocyte count, NIMV non-invasive mechanical ventilation, NLCR neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio, PSM propensity score matching, SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment, TPE therapeutic plasma exchange, WBC white blood cell. Results were given as percentage, mean ± sd, and median (IQR or min-max). &Minimum and maximum values. Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis

Table 2

Comparisons of laboratory parameters in pre and post-TPE procedure

Pre-TPEPost-TPEp
WBC (× 103/μL)9.08 ± 4.19.14 ± 3.50.951
Neuc (×103/μL)7.38 ± 3.17.33 ± 3.30.953
Lymc (× 103/μL)0.9 (0.5–1.3)1.02 (0.77–1.27)0.053
NLCR6.8 (1.8–11.7)6.7 (4.2–9.2)0.184
LDH (IU/L)436 (322–550)239 (181–297)0.001
d-dimer (mg/L)&7.8 (2.1–35.2)1.3 (0.6–3.9)< 0.001
Ferritin (ng/mL)&1268 (399–6110)405 (157–1650)0.001
IL-6 (pq/mL)(13)&161 (36.2–2958)24.5 (1.5–130)0.001
CRP (mg/dL)&11.8 (0.4–29.7)0.9 (0.3–7.2)< 0.001
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)&0.27 (0.02–87)0.1 (0.01–39)0.002

CRP C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin-6, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, Lymc lymphocyte count, Neuc neutrophil count, NLCR neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio, TPE therapeutic plasma exchange, WBC white blood cell. Results were given as percentage, mean ± sd, and median (quartiles or min-max). &Minimum and maximum values. Paired sample and Wilcoxon tests were used for the statistical analysis

Comparisons of patients groups AKI acute kidney injury, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, BMI body mass index, CCI Charlson comorbidity index, C dynamic compliance, CRP C-reactive protein, HFOT high-flow oxygen therapy, ICU intensive care unit, IL-6 interleukin-6, IMV invasive mechanical ventilation, LOS length of stay, Lymc lymphocyte count, NIMV non-invasive mechanical ventilation, NLCR neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio, PSM propensity score matching, SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment, TPE therapeutic plasma exchange, WBC white blood cell. Results were given as percentage, mean ± sd, and median (IQR or min-max). &Minimum and maximum values. Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis Comparisons of laboratory parameters in pre and post-TPE procedure CRP C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin-6, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, Lymc lymphocyte count, Neuc neutrophil count, NLCR neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio, TPE therapeutic plasma exchange, WBC white blood cell. Results were given as percentage, mean ± sd, and median (quartiles or min-max). &Minimum and maximum values. Paired sample and Wilcoxon tests were used for the statistical analysis Some patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have a high risk of thrombosis leading to worse outcomes. Therefore, monitoring d-dimer levels is crucial. In these groups of patients, TPE seems to be a treatment which may improve outcomes by effectively removing FDPs and restoring coagulation status. We are aware that TPE may not be routinely required in these patients [6]. However, we think that it should be featured as a part of the treatment especially in COVID-19 pneumonia patients with a high risk of thrombosis.
  6 in total

1.  The molecular weights, mass distribution, chain composition, and structure of soluble fibrin degradation products released from a fibrin clot perfused with plasmin.

Authors:  J B Walker; M E Nesheim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  The efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily Rimmer; Brett L Houston; Anand Kumar; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Carol Friesen; John C Marshall; Gail Rock; Alexis F Turgeon; Deborah J Cook; Donald S Houston; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julie Helms; Charles Tacquard; François Severac; Ian Leonard-Lorant; Mickaël Ohana; Xavier Delabranche; Hamid Merdji; Raphaël Clere-Jehl; Malika Schenck; Florence Fagot Gandet; Samira Fafi-Kremer; Vincent Castelain; Francis Schneider; Lélia Grunebaum; Eduardo Anglés-Cano; Laurent Sattler; Paul-Michel Mertes; Ferhat Meziani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Therapeutic plasma exchange as a routine therapy in septic shock and as an experimental treatment for COVID-19: we are not sure.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Aude Mugisha; Luc Kugener; Sebastien Redant; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Assessing efficacy of CytoSorb haemoadsorber for prevention of organ dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients with infective endocarditis: REMOVE-protocol for randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mahmoud Diab; Stephanie Platzer; Albrecht Guenther; Christoph Sponholz; Andre Scherag; Thomas Lehmann; Ilia Velichkov; Stefan Hagel; Michael Bauer; Frank M Brunkhorst; Torsten Doenst
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Litao Zhang; Xinsheng Yan; Qingkun Fan; Haiyan Liu; Xintian Liu; Zejin Liu; Zhenlu Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 16.036

  6 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive impact of COVID-19: looking beyond the short term.

Authors:  Scott Miners; Patrick G Kehoe; Seth Love
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 2.  The use of therapeutic plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019: A critical appraisal of the current evidence.

Authors:  Wen Lu; Walter Kelley; Deanna C Fang; Sarita Joshi; Young Kim; Monika Paroder; Yvette Tanhehco; Minh-Ha Tran; Huy P Pham
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.605

3.  The association between therapeutic plasma exchange and the risk of mortality among patients critically ill with COVID-19: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shinta Oktya Wardhani; Jonny Karunia Fajar; Gatot Soegiarto; Laksmi Wulandari; Helnida Anggun Maliga; Muhammad Ilmawan; Risna Merysa; Arlentina Bentivolia Simamora; Qurrata Aini; Komang Noviantari; Ayu Widya Lestari; Maria Yoheni Harnila; Imam Syafi'i; Jane Andrea Christiano Djianzonie; Nenci Siagian; Sri Nining; Risyda Zakiyah Hanim; Wahyuni Wahyuni; Fitri Aulia; Juliansyah Juliansyah; Reflin Mahmud; Fredo Tamara; Aditya Indra Mahendra; Amanda Cininta Wowor; Fikri Baladraf; Ponda Hernest Hadinata; Adhityari Ikkeputri; Hana Nadya; Dessy Aprilia Kartini; Milda Husnah; Firzan Nainu; Harapan Harapan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-12-14

4.  Therapeutic plasma exchange followed by convalescent plasma transfusion in severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: A single centre non-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alexandru Noris Novacescu; Georgiana Duma; Bettina Buzzi; Luminita Mirela Baditoiu; Ovidiu Bedreag; Marius Papurica; Dorel Sandesc; Teodora Sorescu; Daliborca Vlad; Monica Licker
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Pathogenesis and Treatment of Cytokine Storm Induced by Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Xi-Dian Tang; Tian-Tian Ji; Jia-Rui Dong; Hao Feng; Feng-Qiang Chen; Xi Chen; Hui-Ying Zhao; De-Kun Chen; Wen-Tao Ma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Application of extracorporeal therapies in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Zhifeng Zhou; Huang Kuang; Yuexian Ma; Ling Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021 Sept 15       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Blood purification could tackle COVID-19?

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamada; Shigeru Ohtsuru
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-12-11

Review 8.  "MATH+" Multi-Modal Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19 Infection: Clinical and Scientific Rationale.

Authors:  Pierre Kory; Ginfranco Umberto Meduri; Jose Iglesias; Joseph Varon; Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani; Paul E Marik
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2022-02-24

9.  Harnessing Type I IFN Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2 with Early Administration of IFN-β.

Authors:  Donald C Vinh; Laurent Abel; Paul Bastard; Matthew P Cheng; Antonio Condino-Neto; Peter K Gregersen; Filomeen Haerynck; Maria-Pia Cicalese; David Hagin; Pere Soler-Palacín; Anna M Planas; Aurora Pujol; Luigi D Notarangelo; Qian Zhang; Helen C Su; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Isabelle Meyts
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 8.542

10.  TPE seems to be a treatment that may improve outcomes by effectively removing fibrin degradation products and restoring coagulation status: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Leonel Barreto Gutierrez; Luc Kugener; Sebastien Redant; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.