| Literature DB >> 32771040 |
Vadym Krasnovyd1, Lukáš Vetešník2, Andrea Šimková3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Host specificity is one of the outputs of the coevolution between parasites and their associated hosts. Several scenarios have been proposed to explain the pattern of parasite distribution in parental and hybrid genotypes ranging from hybrid resistance to hybrid susceptibility. We hypothesized that host-parasite co-adaptation limits the infection of host-specific parasites in hybrid genotypes even under the condition of the high frequency of hybrids. The experimental monogenean infection in pure breeds of Blicca bjoerkna and Abramis brama and cross-breeds (the F1 generation of hybrids) under the condition of similar frequencies of pure and hybrid genotypes was investigated. We also examined the potential effect of the maternal origin of hybrids (potential co-adaptation at the level of mitochondrial genes) on monogenean abundance.Entities:
Keywords: Coadaptation; Cyprinid fish; Host specificity; Hybridization; Monogenean infection
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32771040 PMCID: PMC7414675 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04271-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Intensity of monogenean infection (MI, mean ± standard deviation), range of intensity of infection (I, minimum-maximum), and prevalence (P, in %) for each monogenean species in A. brama and B. bjoerkna captured from nature
| Parasite species | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | I | P | MI | I | P | |
| 1.67 ± 1.16 | 1–3 | 38 | – | – | – | |
| 4.00 ± 2.65 | 1–6 | 38 | – | – | – | |
| 9.80 ± 8.90 | 2–22 | 63 | – | – | – | |
| 1.67 ± 0.58 | 1–2 | 38 | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | 2.00 ± 1.41 | 1–3 | 29 | |
| – | – | – | 4.75 ± 4.35 | 1–9 | 57 | |
| – | – | – | 1.75 ± 1.5 | 1–4 | 57 | |
| – | – | – | 1.50 ± 0.71 | 1–2 | 29 | |
| 1 | – | 13 | – | – | – | |
| 2 | 2 | 63 | – | – | – | |
Fig. 1Total monogenean abundance (a) and Dactylogyrus abundance (b) in breed lines of B. bjoerkna, A. brama and hybrids. Abbreviations: AB, Abramis brama; BB, Blicca bjoerkna; ABBB, hybrids with maternal A. brama; BBAB, hybrids with maternal B. bjoerkna
Intensity of monogenean infection (MI, mean ± standard deviation), range of intensity of infection (I, minimum-maximum), and prevalence (P, in %) for each monogenean species in pure A. brama, pure B. bjoerkna and hybrids
| Parasite species | F1 hybrids with maternal origin of | F1 hybrids with maternal origin of | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | I | P | MI | I | P | MI | I | P | MI | I | P | |
| 1 | 1 | 10 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |
| 4.00 ± 3.00 | 1–10 | 55 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |
| 7.93 ± 8.93 | 1–33 | 70 | – | – | – | 7.36 ± 8.24 | 1–24 | 31 | 4.90 ± 5.59 | 1–19 | 32 | |
| 6.13 ± 5.50 | 1–18 | 75 | – | – | – | 2.78 ± 2.77 | 1–8 | 25 | 2.30 ± 1.25 | 1–4 | 32 | |
| – | – | – | 11.83 ± 9.34 | 1–31 | 79 | 7.08 ± 7.02 | 1–27 | 69 | 9.80 ± 10.38 | 1–41 | 48 | |
| – | – | – | 3.53 ± 2.61 | 1–9 | 38 | 1.73 ± 1.27 | 1–4 | 31 | 2.75 ± 2.49 | 1–8 | 26 | |
| – | – | – | 5.77 ± 5.78 | 1–19 | 33 | 3.36 ± 2.95 | 1–10 | 25 | 3.73 ± 4.05 | 1–15 | 35 | |
| 1 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | – | 3 | 3.40 ± 4.28 | 1–11 | 16 | |
| – | – | – | 5.50 ± 4.13 | 1–13 | 41 | 1 | – | 3 | 1.33 ± 0.58 | 1–2 | 10 | |
Fig. 2Asymmetrical distribution of parental-specific parasites in hybrids with different maternal origins. Abundance (a) and species richness (b) of A. brama-specific parasites (indicated as AB in parentheses on the x-axis) and B. bjoerkna -specific parasites (indicated as BB in parentheses on the x-axis) in hybrids with A. brama maternal origin (AB hybrids) and hybrids with B. bjoerkna maternal origin (BB hybrids)