| Literature DB >> 32771027 |
Jenna M Sullivan1,2, Curt Mazur3, Daniel A Wolf1, Laura Horky1, Nicolas Currier1, Bethany Fitzsimmons4, Jacob Hesterman2, Rachel Pauplis2, Scott Haller5, Berit Powers4, Leighla Tayefeh4, Bea DeBrosse-Serra4, Jack Hoppin2, Holly Kordasiewicz4, Eric E Swayze4, Ajay Verma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The intrathecal (IT) dosing route introduces drugs directly into the CSF to bypass the blood-brain barrier and gain direct access to the CNS. We evaluated the use of convective forces acting on the cerebrospinal fluid as a means for increasing rostral delivery of IT dosed radioactive tracer molecules and antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) in the monkey CNS. We also measured the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) volume in a group of cynomolgus monkeys.Entities:
Keywords: Antisense oligonucleotide; CT imaging; Convective forces; Intrathecal; Lumbar puncture; PET imaging; SPECT imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32771027 PMCID: PMC7414676 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02461-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Whole body CSF volume determined in cynomolgus monkeys using MRI image analysis
| Animal # | Sex | Body weight (kg) | Total CSF volume (cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1001 | Male | 3.7 | 14.4 |
| A1002 | Female | 3.1 | 8.8 |
| A1003 | Male | 3.3 | 11.0 |
| A1004 | Female | 3.3 | 10.0 |
| A1005 | Male | 3.7 | 10.3 |
| A1006 | Female | 4.1 | 11.8 |
| A1007 | Female | 3.8 | 11.9 |
| A1008 | Male | 4.2 | 11.7 |
| A1009 | Female | 3.1 | 12.6 |
| A1010 | Male | 3.4 | 12.4 |
| A1011 | Female | 2.8 | 10.4 |
| A1012 | Male | 3.7 | 13.2 |
| A1013 | Female | 3.2 | 10.6 |
| A1014 | Male | 3.1 | 10.4 |
| A1015 | Female | 4.0 | 12.3 |
| A1016 | Male | 4.2 | 11.1 |
| A1017 | Female | 4.1 | 10.9 |
| A1018 | Male | 3.2 | 11.5 |
| A1019 | Male | 4.3 | 14.9 |
| A1020 | Female | 3.4 | 11.0 |
Fig. 1a Imaging rejection criteria for poor technical injections in the 64Cu-DOTA experiment. The PET/CT scan on the left is indicative of a successful IT injection where the radioisotope is mostly contained in the neuraxial compartments. The PET/CT scan on the right illustrates an unsuccessful IT injection where a high radioisotope signal can be seen in the kidneys, ureters and bladder. Sites of injection of the 64Cu-DOTA are indicated by arrows. PET images were smoothed with a 2.5 mm Gaussian filter and scaled from 0 to 2% ID/g indicated by the color scale bar. b Graph of the ASO tissue concentrations in µg/g tissue in the lumbar spinal cords of all the animals. Animals with lumbar spinal cord tissue concentrations below 3 µg/g tissue were considered probable missed injections due to technical reasons. There were two animals in both low volume (0.8 mL) groups and one animal in each high dose volume (2.4 mL) group that had lumbar spinal cord concentrations below 3 µg/g
Fig. 2Area under the curve analysis (AUC) of the radioactivity concentration versus time curves from the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical spinal regions and the cranial region of the PET scans. AUC values are in units of %ID/g h. a Image of 64Cu-DOTA PET imaging in the cynomolgus monkey. b Image of the regions of interest superimposed on the CT scan of a cynomolgus monkey. c Comparisons of low (0.4 mL) versus high (1.8 mL) injection volume in the different CNS tissues. d Comparisons between low injection volume versus low injection volume with percussive wrap treatment in the different CNS tissues. e Comparisons between high injection volume and high injection volume with percussive wrap treatment in the different CNS tissues. Data displayed are individual values with a horizontal bar depicting the mean for each group. The P values resulting from the two-sided Welch’s T test are written above each graph and a star (*) designates a P value less than 0.05
Fig. 3Co-registered maximum intensity projection SPECT and CT images at 40-min post-injection from representative animals from the low (0.8 mL) volume (a), low volume plus percussive wrap (b), high (2.4 mL) volume (c), or high volume plus percussive wrap (d) treatment groups. The 99mTc-DTPA tracer incorporated into the dosing solution appears as bright areas within the spinal and cranial areas. SPECT images are scaled from 0 to 1% injected dose/g indicated by the color scale bar. Bright artefacts seen on the images are pulse oximeter sensors placed on the ear
Fig. 4Graphs of the CNS tissue concentrations in µg/g tissue and of the expression levels of MALAT1 RNA for the animals in the different groups illustrating the specific comparisons made in the experiment. The CNS tissues are arranged from the tissues closest to the injection site on the left of each graph (lumbar spinal cord) to the most distal from the injection site (frontal cortex) on the right of each graph. Graphs a–c have the ASO tissue concentration data and d–f displays the Malat1 RNA expression values as percent of naïve expression. Graphs a and d display the comparisons between high and low volumes with no percussive wraps; graphs b and e display the comparisons between low volume with and without percussive wraps; graphs c and f display the comparisons between high volume with and without percussive wraps. Graphs g–j display the comparisons between the different treatment paradigms and the naïve Malat1 gene expression levels. The key to the different symbols is on the right of the figure. * P < 0.05 for the specific comparison using a Dunnett’s T-test
P values for Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for ASO concentration results
| Comparisons | Adjusted P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumbar spinal cord | Thoracic spinal cord | Cervical spinal cord | Frontal cortex | |
| Low volume no wrap vs. high volume no wrap | 0.9818 | 0.8036 | 0.7176 | 0.1114 |
| Low volume no wrap vs. low volume + wrap | 0.8994 | 0.4168 | 0.9976 | 0.7696 |
| High volume no wrap vs. high volume + wrap | 0.1791 | 0.9998 | 0.9807 | 0.4357 |
P values for Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for Malat1 RNA expression results
| Comparison | Adjusted P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumbar spinal cord | Thoracic spinal cord | Cervical spinal cord | Frontal cortex | |
| Naive vs. low volume no wrap | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | 0.0008* | 0.463 |
| Naive vs. low volume + wrap | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* |
| Naive vs. high volume no wrap | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* |
| Naive vs. high volume + wrap | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* |
| Low volume no wrap vs. high volume no wrap | 0.9877 | 0.9916 | 0.6978 | 0.0018* |
| Low volume no wrap vs. low volume + wrap | 0.9731 | 0.9976 | 0.9477 | 0.0014* |
| High volume no wrap vs. high volume + wrap | > 0.9999 | > 0.9999 | > 0.9999 | 0.9086 |
*indicates a P < 0.05
Fig. 5Imaging the spinal cord and frontal cortex ASO distribution and pharmacology. Representative images from MALAT1 ISH (left three columns) and ASO IHC (two columns on the right) in representative animals from the naïve animal, the low (0.8 mL) volume no wrap, and high (2.4 mL) volume no wrap groups. Images are arranged top to bottom with the proximal (lumber spinal cord) to distal (frontal cortex) areas from the injection site. In the spinal cord pictures, white matter is designated by WM and gray matter by GM. The tissue concentrations in ug/g tissue measured by LC–MS in the adjacent tissues are displayed in the ASO IHC pictures. The MALAT1 RNA expression values (percent of naïve control) as measured by PCR from the adjacent spinal cord tissues are written on the ASO treated MALAT1 ISH pictures. Horizontal black bars are scale bars representative of 100 µm
Fig. 6Effect of injection volume on the CNS distribution and pharmacology of an ASO specific to the MAPT gene. a Graphs of the tissue concentrations (µg/g tissue) of the MAPT ASO in the lumbar and thoracic spinal cord, and frontal cortex for the animals treated with low (0.8 mL, gray) or high (2.0 mL, red) dose volume. b Graphs for the MAPT mRNA expression for the low (gray) versus high (red) volume treatments as a percentage of the vehicle treated (black) animals. At the top of each graph is the P value for the comparison of the low versus high volume treatment as calculated with two tailed Welch’s T-test. A star (*) designates a P value less than 0.05. Data is depicted as individual values with horizontal bar depicting the mean value for the group