| Literature DB >> 32771003 |
Cristina Marchetti1, Paolo Borghetti1, Antonio Cacchioli1, Luca Ferrari2, Federico Armando1, Attilio Corradi1, Anna Maria Cantoni1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on gamma-delta (γδ) T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of dogs are scant, related only to healthy pure breed dogs and limited to a restricted age range. The aim of the study was to investigate the modulation of the γδ T lymphocyte (TCRγδ+) subpopulation in peripheral blood of crossbreed healthy dogs according to five identified stages of life: Puppy, Junior, Adult, Mature, Senior and to determine its implication in aging. A rigorous method of recruitment was used to minimize the influence of internal or external pressure on the immune response. Twenty-three intact female and twenty-four intact male dogs were enrolled. Blood samples were collected and immunophenotyping of peripheral blood T lymphocytes and γδ T cell subpopulations was performed.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Breed; Dog; Stage of life; γδ T lymphocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32771003 PMCID: PMC7414535 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02504-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Data of recruited dogs according to age, sex, weight and clinical examination
| Dog | Age | Sex | Weight | Clinical examination | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | Months | Female (F) / Male (M) | Kg | VTH or VTH partners | |
| 1 | 13 | 0 | F | 29.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 3 * |
| 2 | 13 | 2 | F | 30.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 2 |
| 3 | 7 | 2 | F | 36.0 | Routine check-up |
| 4 | 5 | 3 | F | 5.0 | Neutering |
| 5 | 12 | 6 | M | 12.0 | Orthopedic follow-up; Periodontitis stage 2 |
| 6 | 5 | 4 | F | 31.0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 7 | 2 | 4 | M | 22.5 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 8 | 9 | 2 | F | 25.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 2 |
| 9 | 9 | 5 | F | 27.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 2 |
| 10 | 8 | 3 | M | 38.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 2 |
| 11 | 1 | 6 | M | 16.4 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 12 | 6 | 4 | M | 18.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 2 |
| 13 | 0 | 11 | F | 18.0 | Neutering |
| 14 | 9 | 0 | M | 8.6 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 3 * |
| 15 | 3 | 8 | M | 57.0 | Orthopedic follow-up |
| 16 | 5 | 0 | M | 43.0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 17 | 5 | 2 | F | 44.0 | Neutering |
| 18 | 5 | 5 | M | 46.0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 19 | 0 | 11 | F | 13.0 | Neutering |
| 20 | 1 | 6 | M | 22.0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 21 | 4 | 6 | F | 48.5 | Orthopedic follow-up |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | M | 36.0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 23 | 2 | 11 | M | 25.0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 24 | 2 | 6 | F | 25.0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 25 | 0 | 8 | F | 42.0 | Neutering |
| 26 | 1 | 4 | M | 37.6 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | M | 39.5 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 28 | 0 | 8 | F | 16.5 | Neutering |
| 29 | 12 | 9 | M | 35.0 | Orthopedic follow-up; Periodontitis stage 3 |
| 30 | 10 | 1 | M | 32.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 3 |
| 31 | 0 | 9 | F | 5.7 | Neutering |
| 32 | 0 | 9 | M | 8.0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 33 | 0 | 9 | F | 18.5 | Neutering |
| 34 | 2 | 3 | F | 31.9 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 35 | 0 | 7 | F | 30.0 | Neutering |
| 36 | 0 | 7 | F | 17.5 | Neutering |
| 37 | 3 | 10 | F | 37.8 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 38 | 1 | 3 | M | 42,0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 39 | 2 | 11 | M | 28,0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 40 | 0 | 4 | M | 17.0 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 41 | 0 | 6 | M | 31.6 | Ophthalmic follow-up |
| 42 | 2 | 7 | M | 18.0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 43 | 8 | 0 | F | 31.0 | Routine check-up * |
| 44 | 2 | 3 | F | 39.0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 45 | 1 | 6 | M | 17.0 | Microfilaria and antigen testing |
| 46 | 13 | 3 | F | 32.0 | Routine check-up; Periodontitis stage 2 * |
| 47 | 10 | 5 | M | 23.0 | Orthopedic follow-up; Periodontitis stage 3 * |
VTH Veterinary Teaching Hospital; * dogs recruited from private veterinary practice VTH partners
Definition of dog groups according to stage of life, also indicating sex and describing weight range and clinical features
| N | Sex | Age | Weight | Clinical Examination | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group P (Puppies) | 11 healthy dogs | 8 Females 3 males | From 4 to 11 months | From 5.7 to 42.0 Kg | 2 males ophthalmological follow-up; 1 male microfilaria antigen-testing; all female referred for neutering |
| Group J (Junior) | 14 healthy dogs | 3 females 11 males | From 1 to 2 years | From 16.4 to 42.0 Kg | 1 female and 5 males ophthalmological follow-up; 2 females and 6 males microfilaria antigen testing |
| Group A (Adult) | 8 healthy dogs | 5 females 3 males | From 3 to 5 years | From 5.0 to 57.0 Kg | 2 females referred for neutering; 2 females and 2 males ophthalmological follow-up; 1 female orthopedic follow up; 1 male surgical stabilization after Cranial Cruciate Ligament rupture |
| Group M (Mature) | 7 healthy dogs | 4 females 3 males | From 6 to 9 years | From 8.6 to 38.0 Kg | All dogs for routine check-up, 6 showed periodontal disease: 3 females and 2 males stage 2 and 1 male stage 3 |
| Group S (Senior) | 7 healthy dogs | 3 females 4 males | From 10 to 13 years | From 12.0 to 35.0 Kg | 3 females and 1 male routine check-up; 3 male follow-up post traumatic arthropathy. All the dogs affected by periodontal disease: 2 females and 1 male stage2; 1 female and 3 males stage 3 |
Fig. 1Representative flow cytometry dot plot of canine PBMC, showing lymphocyte gating (A) and density plots of TCRγδ+ cells (left upper quadrant, S1) and unspecific secondary antibody staining (left upper quadrant, Q1)
White blood cells (WBC), total lymphocytes, counts and percentages of CD3+ T lymphocytes and TCRγδ+ T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of dogs expressed as cell count and percentage mean values ± standard deviation (SD) and percentage range values (minimum and maximum) according to the stage of life
| WBC | Lymphocytes | T lymphocytes (CD3+) | γδ T lymphocytes (TCRγδ+) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage of life | mean ± SD | range | mean ± SD | range | mean ± SD | range | mean ± SD | range | mean ± SD | range | mean ± SD | range |
| (cells/μl) | (cells/μl) | (%) | (cells/μl) | (%) | (cells/μl) | |||||||
| 6509 ± 2502 | 1600–11,000 | 3745 ± 294 | 3400–4400 | 55.27 ± 15.92 | 25.60–84.84 | 2049 ± 523 | 964–2944 | 2.92 ± 2.27 | 1.15–6.94 | 133 ± 86 | 40–278 | |
| 9700 ± 3696 | 4300–18,700 | 2950 ± 429 | 2400–3500 | 62.99 ± 13.69 | 22.69–83.64 | 1839 ± 433 | 775–2630 | 2.49 ± 1.29 | 0.74–3.97 | 78 ± 50 | 18–180 | |
| 10,775 ± 1652 | 7800–13,600 | 2968 ± 629 | 2100–3900 | 67.35 ± 24.46 | 14.25–91.60 | 2037 ± 741 | 477–2805 | 2.46 ± 1.66 | 1.15–6.30 | 94 ± 53 | 43–176 | |
| 8271 ± 996 | 7000–9500 | 2771 ± 502 | 1800–3500 | 45.56 ± 34.18 | 8.62–88.70 | 1180 ± 860 | 229–2449 | 1.36 ± 0.65 | 0.13–2.32 | 33 ± 24 | 2–81 | |
| 7514 ± 358 | 7000–8000 | 2475 ± 162 | 2300–2700 | 43.05 ± 21.88 | 6.80–65.70 | 1056 ± 529 | 159–1707 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.34–0.58 | 10 ± 3 | 8–16 | |
Fig. 2Counts of total lymphocytes and CD3+ T lymphocytes (upper left) and γδ T lymphocytes (lower left) in the peripheral blood of crossbreed dogs in relation to age. Absolute counts are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). Percentage values of γδ T lymphocytes of each individual dog are shown in relation to the age expressed as months after birth (upper right) as well as to the stage of life (lower right) (P: Puppy, J: Junior, A: Adult, M: Mature, S: Senior)
Fig. 3Course of TCRγδ+ cells in peripheral blood of dogs according to stages of life. Representative flow cytometry density plots of canine lymphocyte-gated TCRγδ+ cells (left upper quadrant, S1) are shown according to the five age groups identified in the study (Puppy, Junior, Adult, Mature, Senior). Data are reported as percentage values
Tamhane’s T2 all-pairs comparison test for normally distributed data with unequal variances stage of life vs. stages of life for percentages of TCRγδ+ cells (significant difference when P ≤ 0.05)
| Stage of life | Stages of life | P |
|---|---|---|
| Puppy vs. | Junior | 1.000 |
| Adult | 0.761 | |
| Mature | 0.251 | |
| Junior vs. | Puppy | 1.000 |
| Adult | 0.679 | |
| Adult vs. | Puppy | 0.761 |
| Junior | 0.679 | |
| Mature | 0.632 | |
| Mature vs. | Puppy | 0.251 |
| Adult | 0.632 | |
| Senior | 0.297 | |
| Senior vs. | ||
| Mature | 0.297 |
Stage of life of the dogs associated with a P value for statistical significance are highlighted in bold characters
Information relative to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the variables considered in the dogs enrolled in the study
| INCLUSION CRITERIA | EXCLUSION CRITERIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Granted | Not granted | |
| Mixed breed | Pure breed | |
| Healthy life-style in close contact with the owners | Less than 2 h of exercise each day | |
| Not required for Puppy | ||
| Commercial standard pet food specific for each stage of life Regular meal time each day | Immunonutrient supplementation (especially zinc ions) | |
| Irregular feeding routine | ||
| Over- or under-feeding | ||
| Competitive eating | ||
| Junior, Adult, Mature, Senior: BCS 4 or 5 out of 9 | Puppy in poor body conditions | |
| Regularly performed “vaccination plan” b (certified only by an electronic medical record) | Any dogs with vaccination status not in line with inclusion criteria Data not certified by an electronic medical record | |
| Test performed after 3 weeks post-vaccination | ||
| After 2 months from: | Data not certified by an electronic medical record Immunomodulant or immunosuppressive therapies Medications, surgeries, trauma and stressors | |
| medications, surgeries, trauma and stressors | ||
| X-rays exposure or computed tomography (CT) | ||
| Entire female or male | Female: pregnant, in estrus, any pathological status of the reproductive tract | |
| Male: cryptorchidism, any pathological status of the reproductive tract | ||
| Endo/ecto-parasites free | Presence of endo/ecto-parasites or therapies in the last 3 weeks | |
| Stages 1, 2, 3 | Stage 4 and/or other inflammatory/ulcerative diseases | |
| Joints had to be free from any pathological status | Acute and chronic pathological conditions |
a A Body Condition Score (BCS) 9-point scale system according to the 2011 World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) Nutritional Assessment Guidelines was adopted [37]: 1, 2, 3 = under ideal; 4, 5 = ideal; 6, 7, 8, 9 = over ideal
b According to the 2011 American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) Canine Vaccination Guidelines [38]
c Periodontal disease was scored according to a periodontal 4-point scale system provided by the Merck Veterinary Manual [39]