Literature DB >> 32770472

How do different types of energy technological progress affect regional carbon intensity? A spatial panel approach.

Wei Gu1, Zhongzhu Chu1, Chen Wang2.   

Abstract

This paper investigated the spatial effects of two types of technological progress, namely renewable energy technology patents (RET patents) and energy conservation and emission reduction technology patents (ECERT patents), on carbon intensity of 30 provinces in China. Based on the 2005-2017 provincial panel dataset of China, this paper used the spatial Durbin model to analyze the spatial dependence and the spillover effects of surrounding provinces. The results first proved the existence of the spatial correlation in the carbon intensity across different provinces in China. Second, we found that the energy conservation and emission reduction technological progress can effectively reduce the province's own carbon intensity; however, this role is not significantly reflected by the progress in renewable energy technologies. Nonetheless, both types of technological progress have negative indirect and total effects on carbon intensity, thereby indicating that, geographically, they have technology diffusion effects. At the same time, the results demonstrated that technology patents play a negative role in carbon intensity. Third, by taking the interaction item between energy consumption and renewable energy technology patents into consideration, it was observed that the progress in renewable energy technologies can reduce the carbon intensity, owing to its role in optimizing the energy consumption structure of the province, but increase the carbon intensity of the surrounding provinces. Finally, based on the abovementioned findings, this paper put forward corresponding policy proposals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon intensity; Energy conservation and emission reduction technology patents; Renewable energy technology patents; Spatial Durbin model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32770472     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10327-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic Threshold Effect of Directed Technical Change Suppress on Urban Carbon Footprint in China.

Authors:  Xiaojun Lyu; Haiqian Ke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The impact of high-tech product export trade on regional carbon performance in China: the mediating roles of industrial structure supererogation, low-carbon technological innovation, and human capital accumulation.

Authors:  Miao Han; Yan Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Study on the extension of the dynamic benchmark system of per capita carbon emissions in China's county.

Authors:  Fengmei Yang; Longyu Shi; Xiaotong Wang; Lijie Gao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  How to Efficiently Reduce the Carbon Intensity of the Heavy Industry in China? Using Quantile Regression Approach.

Authors:  Bin Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Does Technological Innovation Promote Green Development? A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China.

Authors:  Senlin Hu; Gang Zeng; Xianzhong Cao; Huaxi Yuan; Bing Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.