Literature DB >> 32769746

Double standard: why electrocardiogram is standard care while electroencephalogram is not?

Yun Li1,2, Christian Bohringer2, Hong Liu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) significantly affect the surgical outcomes. Electrocardiogram (ECG) has been a standard intraoperative monitor for 30 years. Electroencephalogram (EEG) can provide valuable information about the anesthetized state and guide anesthesia management during surgery. Whether EEG should be a standard intraoperative monitor is discussed in this review. RECENT
FINDINGS: Deep anesthesia has been associated with postoperative delirium, especially in elderly patients. Intraoperative EEG monitoring has been demonstrated to reduce total anesthesia drug use during general anesthesia and postoperative delirium.
SUMMARY: Unlike ECG monitoring, the EEG under general anesthesia has not been designated as a standard monitor by anesthesiologist societies around the world. The processed EEG technology has been commercially available for more than 25 years and EEG technology has significantly facilitated its intraoperative use. It is time to consider EEG as a standard anesthesia monitor during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32769746     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  2 in total

1.  Processed EEG monitoring in critical care: a black swan or a shining star?

Authors:  Francisco A Lobo; Chiara Robba; Massimo Lamperti; Stefano Romagnoli; Frank A Rasulo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 1.977

2.  Peri-operative multimodal monitoring: a real need or a luxury?

Authors:  Zahra Moaiyeri; Flávia Duarte; Massimo Lamperti; Francisco A Lobo
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 1.977

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.