Literature DB >> 32769451

The Evolution of Assessment: Thinking Longitudinally and Developmentally.

Eric S Holmboe1, Kenji Yamazaki2, Stanley J Hamstra3.   

Abstract

Becoming a physician or other health care professional is a complex and intensely developmental process occurring over a prolonged period of time. The learning path for each medical student, resident, and fellow varies due to different individual learner abilities and curricular designs, clinical contexts, and assessments used by the training program. The slow and uneven evolution to outcomes-based medical education is partly the result of inadequate approaches to programmatic assessment that do not fully address all essential core competencies needed for practice or account for the developmental nature of training. Too many assessments in medical education still focus on single point-in-time performance or function as indirect proxies for actual performance in clinical care for patients and families.Milestones are a modest first step of providing predictive, longitudinal data on a national scale. Longitudinal Milestones data can facilitate the continuous improvement efforts of programs in assessment. However, Milestone judgments are only as good as the assessment data and group processes that inform them. Programmatic assessment should be longitudinally focused and provide all learners with comprehensive and actionable data to guide their professional development and support creation of meaningful individualized action plans. Efforts are urgently needed to rebalance programmatic assessment away from an overreliance on assessment proxies toward more effectively using developmentally focused work-based assessments, routinely incorporate clinical performance and patient experience data, and partner with learners through iterative coproduced assessment activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32769451     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Concordance of Narrative Comments with Supervision Ratings Provided During Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments.

Authors:  Andrew S Parsons; Kelley Mark; James R Martindale; Megan J Bray; Ryan P Smith; Elizabeth Bradley; Maryellen Gusic
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  A Validity Framework for Effective Analysis and Interpretation of Milestones Data.

Authors:  Stanley J Hamstra; Kenji Yamazaki
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Workplace-based licensing assessments: an idea worth considering?

Authors:  Rose Hatala; Walter Tavares
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2022-08-26

4.  An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Emma Whitelock-Wainwright; Jia Wei Koh; Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright; Stella Talic; David Rankin; Dragan Gašević
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  "When a Measure Becomes a Target, It Ceases to be a Good Measure".

Authors:  Christopher Mattson; Reamer L Bushardt; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-13

6.  Longitudinal Reliability of Milestones-Based Learning Trajectories in Family Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Yoon Soo Park; Stanley J Hamstra; Kenji Yamazaki; Eric Holmboe
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.