Hsuan-Chen Liu1, Dixita I Viswanath2, Federica Pesaresi3, Yitian Xu4, Licheng Zhang4, Nicola Di Trani5, Jesus Paez-Mayorga6, Nathanael Hernandez1, Yu Wang1, Donald R Erm1, Jeremy Ho7, Antonia Susnjar1, Xuewu Liu1, Sandra Demaria8, Shu-Hsia Chen4, Bin S Teh9, Edward Brian Butler10, Corrine Ying Xuan Chua11, Alessandro Grattoni12. 1. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Texas A&M University, College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas. 3. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy. 4. Center for Immunotherapy Research, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; ImmunoMonitoring Core, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; University of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS), Beijing, China. 6. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, NL, Mexico. 7. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 8. Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 9. Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas. 11. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: ychua@houstonmethodist.org. 12. Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: agrattoni@houstonmethodist.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mounting evidence demonstrates that combining radiation therapy (RT) with immunotherapy can reduce tumor burden in a subset of patients. However, conventional systemic delivery of immunotherapeutics is often associated with significant adverse effects, which force treatment cessation. The aim of this study was to investigate a minimally invasive therapeutics delivery approach to improve clinical response while attenuating toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used a nanofluidic drug-eluting seed (NDES) for sustained intratumoral delivery of combinational antibodies CD40 and PDL1. To enhance immune and tumor response, we combined the NDES intratumoral platform with RT to treat the 4T1 murine model of advanced triple negative breast cancer. We compared the efficacy of NDES against intraperitoneal administration, which mimics conventional systemic treatment. Tumor growth was recorded, and local and systemic immune responses were assessed via imaging mass cytometry and flow cytometry. Livers and lungs were histologically analyzed for evaluation of toxicity and metastasis, respectively. RESULTS: The combination of RT and sustained intratumoral immunotherapy delivery of CD40 and PDL1 via NDES (NDES CD40/PDL1) showed an increase in both local and systemic immune response. In combination with RT, NDES CD40/PDL1 achieved significant tumor burden reduction and liver inflammation mitigation compared with systemic treatment. Importantly, our treatment strategy boosted the abscopal effect toward attenuating lung metastatic burden. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study demonstrated superior efficacy of combination treatment with RT and sustained intratumoral immunotherapy via NDES, offering promise for improving therapeutic index and clinical response.
PURPOSE: Mounting evidence demonstrates that combining radiation therapy (RT) with immunotherapy can reduce tumor burden in a subset of patients. However, conventional systemic delivery of immunotherapeutics is often associated with significant adverse effects, which force treatment cessation. The aim of this study was to investigate a minimally invasive therapeutics delivery approach to improve clinical response while attenuating toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used a nanofluidic drug-eluting seed (NDES) for sustained intratumoral delivery of combinational antibodies CD40 and PDL1. To enhance immune and tumor response, we combined the NDES intratumoral platform with RT to treat the 4T1 murine model of advanced triple negative breast cancer. We compared the efficacy of NDES against intraperitoneal administration, which mimics conventional systemic treatment. Tumor growth was recorded, and local and systemic immune responses were assessed via imaging mass cytometry and flow cytometry. Livers and lungs were histologically analyzed for evaluation of toxicity and metastasis, respectively. RESULTS: The combination of RT and sustained intratumoral immunotherapy delivery of CD40 and PDL1 via NDES (NDES CD40/PDL1) showed an increase in both local and systemic immune response. In combination with RT, NDES CD40/PDL1 achieved significant tumor burden reduction and liver inflammation mitigation compared with systemic treatment. Importantly, our treatment strategy boosted the abscopal effect toward attenuating lung metastatic burden. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study demonstrated superior efficacy of combination treatment with RT and sustained intratumoral immunotherapy via NDES, offering promise for improving therapeutic index and clinical response.
Authors: Paul E Wallner; Mitchell S Anscher; Christopher A Barker; Michael Bassetti; Robert G Bristow; Yong I Cha; Adam P Dicker; Silvia C Formenti; Edward E Graves; Stephen M Hahn; Tom K Hei; Alec C Kimmelman; David G Kirsch; Kevin R Kozak; Theodore S Lawrence; Brian Marples; William H McBride; Ross B Mikkelsen; Catherine C Park; Joanne B Weidhaas; Anthony L Zietman; Michael Steinberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: John A Thompson; Bryan J Schneider; Julie Brahmer; Stephanie Andrews; Philippe Armand; Shailender Bhatia; Lihua E Budde; Luciano Costa; Marianne Davies; David Dunnington; Marc S Ernstoff; Matthew Frigault; Brianna Hoffner; Christopher J Hoimes; Mario Lacouture; Frederick Locke; Matthew Lunning; Nisha A Mohindra; Jarushka Naidoo; Anthony J Olszanski; Olalekan Oluwole; Sandip P Patel; Sunil Reddy; Mabel Ryder; Bianca Santomasso; Scott Shofer; Jeffrey A Sosman; Momen Wahidi; Yinghong Wang; Alyse Johnson-Chilla; Jillian L Scavone Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Susan M Hiniker; Daniel S Chen; Sunil Reddy; Daniel T Chang; Jennifer C Jones; Joseph A Mollick; Susan M Swetter; Susan J Knox Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Peter Schmid; Sylvia Adams; Hope S Rugo; Andreas Schneeweiss; Carlos H Barrios; Hiroji Iwata; Véronique Diéras; Roberto Hegg; Seock-Ah Im; Gail Shaw Wright; Volkmar Henschel; Luciana Molinero; Stephen Y Chui; Roel Funke; Amreen Husain; Eric P Winer; Sherene Loi; Leisha A Emens Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sandra M M Irenaeus; Dorte Nielsen; Peter Ellmark; Jeffrey Yachnin; Adnan Deronic; Anneli Nilsson; Per Norlén; Niina Veitonmäki; Camilla S Wennersten; Gustav J Ullenhag Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Nicola Di Trani; Fernanda P Pons-Faudoa; Antons Sizovs; Kathryn A Shelton; Mark A Marzinke; Pramod N Nehete; Alessandro Grattoni Journal: Adv Ther (Weinh) Date: 2021-12-26
Authors: Lin Wang; Yitian Xu; Licheng Zhang; Kyeongah Kang; Andriy Kobryn; Kensey Portman; Ronald E Gordon; Ping-Ying Pan; Emanuela Taioli; Stuart A Aaronson; Shu-Hsia Chen; David J Mulholland Journal: Cancer Res Commun Date: 2022
Authors: Simone Capuani; Nathanael Hernandez; Jesus Paez-Mayorga; Prashant Dogra; Zhihui Wang; Vittorio Cristini; Corrine Ying Xuan Chua; Joan E Nichols; Alessandro Grattoni Journal: Mater Today Bio Date: 2022-08-11