Jess A Gwin1, David D Church2, Adrienne Hatch-McChesney3, Emily E Howard1, Christopher T Carrigan3, Nancy E Murphy3, Marques A Wilson3, Lee M Margolis3, John W Carbone4, Robert R Wolfe2, Arny A Ferrando2, Stefan M Pasiakos5. 1. Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Belcamp, MD, USA. 2. Department of Geriatrics, Donald W. Reynolds Institute on Aging, Center for Translational Research in Aging & Longevity, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 3. Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, USA. 4. School of Health Sciences, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA. 5. Military Nutrition Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, USA. Electronic address: stefan.m.pasiakos.civ@mail.mil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Consuming 0.10-0.14 g essential amino acids (EAA)/kg/dose (0.25-0.30 g protein/kg/dose) maximally stimulates muscle protein synthesis (MPS) during energy balance. Whether consuming EAA beyond that amount enhances MPS and whole-body anabolism following energy deficit is unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of standard and high EAA ingestion on mixed MPS and whole-body protein turnover following energy deficit. DESIGN:Nineteen males (mean ± SD; 23 ± 5 y; 25.4 ± 2.7 kg/m2) completed a randomized, double-blind crossover study consisting of two, 5-d energy deficits (-30 ± 4% of total energy requirements), separated by 14-d. Following each energy deficit, mixed MPS and whole-body protein synthesis (PS), breakdown (PB), and net balance (NET) were determined at rest and post-resistance exercise (RE) using primed, constant L-[2H5]-phenylalanine and L-[2H2]-tyrosine infusions. Beverages providing standard (0.1 g/kg, 7.87 ± 0.87 g) or high (0.3 g/kg, 23.5 ± 2.54 g) EAA were consumed post-RE. Circulating EAA were measured. RESULTS: Postabsorptive mixed MPS (%/h) at rest was not different (P = 0.67) between treatments. Independent of EAA, postprandial mixed MPS at rest (standard EAA, 0.055 ± 0.01; high EAA, 0.061 ± 0.02) and post-RE (standard EAA, 0.055 ± 0.01; high EAA, 0.065 ± 0.02) were greater than postabsorptive mixed MPS at rest (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). Change in (Δ postabsorptive) whole-body (g/180 min) PS and PB was greater for high than standard EAA [mean treatment difference (95% CI), 3.4 (2.3, 4.4); P = 0.001 and -15.6 (-17.8, -13.5); P = 0.001, respectively]. NET was more positive for high than standard EAA [19.0 (17.3, 20.7); P = 0.001]. EAA concentrations were greater in high than standard EAA (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that high compared to standard EAA ingestion enhances whole-body protein status during underfeeding. However, the effects of consuming high and standard EAA on mixed MPS are the same during energy deficit. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT03372928, https://clinicaltrials.gov. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Consuming 0.10-0.14 g essential amino acids (EAA)/kg/dose (0.25-0.30 g protein/kg/dose) maximally stimulates muscle protein synthesis (MPS) during energy balance. Whether consuming EAA beyond that amount enhances MPS and whole-body anabolism following energy deficit is unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the effects of standard and high EAA ingestion on mixed MPS and whole-body protein turnover following energy deficit. DESIGN: Nineteen males (mean ± SD; 23 ± 5 y; 25.4 ± 2.7 kg/m2) completed a randomized, double-blind crossover study consisting of two, 5-d energy deficits (-30 ± 4% of total energy requirements), separated by 14-d. Following each energy deficit, mixed MPS and whole-body protein synthesis (PS), breakdown (PB), and net balance (NET) were determined at rest and post-resistance exercise (RE) using primed, constant L-[2H5]-phenylalanine and L-[2H2]-tyrosine infusions. Beverages providing standard (0.1 g/kg, 7.87 ± 0.87 g) or high (0.3 g/kg, 23.5 ± 2.54 g) EAA were consumed post-RE. Circulating EAA were measured. RESULTS: Postabsorptive mixed MPS (%/h) at rest was not different (P = 0.67) between treatments. Independent of EAA, postprandial mixed MPS at rest (standard EAA, 0.055 ± 0.01; high EAA, 0.061 ± 0.02) and post-RE (standard EAA, 0.055 ± 0.01; high EAA, 0.065 ± 0.02) were greater than postabsorptive mixed MPS at rest (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). Change in (Δ postabsorptive) whole-body (g/180 min) PS and PB was greater for high than standard EAA [mean treatment difference (95% CI), 3.4 (2.3, 4.4); P = 0.001 and -15.6 (-17.8, -13.5); P = 0.001, respectively]. NET was more positive for high than standard EAA [19.0 (17.3, 20.7); P = 0.001]. EAA concentrations were greater in high than standard EAA (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that high compared to standard EAA ingestion enhances whole-body protein status during underfeeding. However, the effects of consuming high and standard EAA on mixed MPS are the same during energy deficit. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT03372928, https://clinicaltrials.gov. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Energy deficit; Essential amino acids; Muscle protein synthesis; Protein; Whole-body protein turnover
Authors: Drew E Gonzalez; Matthew J McAllister; Hunter S Waldman; Arny A Ferrando; Jill Joyce; Nicholas D Barringer; J Jay Dawes; Adam J Kieffer; Travis Harvey; Chad M Kerksick; Jeffrey R Stout; Tim N Ziegenfuss; Annette Zapp; Jamie L Tartar; Jeffery L Heileson; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Douglas S Kalman; Bill I Campbell; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.948
Authors: David D Church; Katie R Hirsch; Sanghee Park; Il-Young Kim; Jess A Gwin; Stefan M Pasiakos; Robert R Wolfe; Arny A Ferrando Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Jess A Gwin; David D Church; Adrienne Hatch-McChesney; Jillian T Allen; Marques A Wilson; Alyssa N Varanoske; Christopher T Carrigan; Nancy E Murphy; Lee M Margolis; John W Carbone; Robert R Wolfe; Arny A Ferrando; Stefan M Pasiakos Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Jacob T Mey; Jean-Philippe Godin; Amanda R Scelsi; Emily L Kullman; Steven K Malin; Shengping Yang; Z Elizabeth Floyd; Alexander Poulev; Roger A Fielding; Alastair B Ross; John P Kirwan Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2021-09-25