Literature DB >> 32768298

A 30-year analysis of National Institutes of Health-funded cardiac transplantation research: Surgeons lead the way.

Adishesh K Narahari1, J Hunter Mehaffey1, Anirudha S Chandrabhatla1, Pranav K Baderdinni1, Allison Weiderhold1, Ian O Cook1, Robert B Hawkins1, Mark E Roeser1, John A Kern1, Irving L Kron2, Leora T Yarboro1, Gorav Ailawadi1, Nicholas R Teman3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Obtaining National Institutes of Health funding for heart transplant research is becoming increasingly difficult, especially for surgeons. We sought to determine the impact of National Institutes of Health-funded cardiac transplantation research over the past 30 years.
METHODS: National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results was queried for R01s using 10 heart transplant-related terms. Principal Investigator, total grant funding amount, number of publications, and citations of manuscripts were collected. A citation-based Grant Impact Metric was assigned to each grant: sum of citations for each manuscript normalized by the funding of the respective grant (per $100K). The department and background degree(s) (MD, PhD, MD/PhD) for each funded Principal Investigator were identified from institutional faculty profiles.
RESULTS: A total of 321 cardiac transplantation R01s totaling $723 million and resulting in 6513 publications were analyzed. Surgery departments received more grants and more funding dollars to study cardiac transplantation than any other department (n = 115, $249 million; Medicine: n = 93, $208 million; Pathology: 26, $55 million). Surgeons performed equally well compared with all other Principal Investigators with respect to Grant Impact Metric (15.1 vs 20.6; P = .19) and publications per $1 million (7.5 vs 6.8; P = .75). Finally, all physician-scientists (MDs) have a significantly higher Grant Impact Metric compared with nonclinician researchers (non-MDs) (22.3 vs 16.3; P = .028).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-scientists are equally productive and impactful compared with nonsurgeons despite decreasing funding rates at the National Institutes of Health and greater pressure from administrators to increase clinical productivity.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Institutes of Health funding; cardiac surgeons; cardiac transplant; heart transplant

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32768298      PMCID: PMC7782209          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  17 in total

1.  Getting promoted.

Authors:  I L Kron
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Getting funded.

Authors:  I L Kron
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Research incentive program for clinical surgical faculty associated with increases in research productivity.

Authors:  Anneke T Schroen; Monika J Thielen; Florence E Turrentine; Irving L Kron; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Comprehensive National Institutes of Health funding analysis of academic cardiac surgeons.

Authors:  Adishesh K Narahari; Ian O Cook; J Hunter Mehaffey; Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Robert B Hawkins; Zachary Tyerman; Eric J Charles; Curtis G Tribble; Irving L Kron; Nicholas R Teman; Mark E Roeser; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Report of the 2015 Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Practice Survey.

Authors:  David L S Morales; Muhammad S Khan; Joseph W Turek; Reshma Biniwale; Christo I Tchervenkov; Michele Rush; Jeffrey P Jacobs; James S Tweddell; Marshall L Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  The history and development of cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  D J DiBardino
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1999

7.  Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons Achieve High Rates of K Award Conversion Into R01 Funding.

Authors:  Adishesh K Narahari; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Pranav K Baderdinni; Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Curtis G Tribble; Irving L Kron; Mark E Roeser; Dustin M Walters; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Surgeon Scientists Are Disproportionately Affected by Declining NIH Funding Rates.

Authors:  Adishesh K Narahari; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Eric J Charles; Pranav K Baderdinni; Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Joseph W Kocan; R Scott Jones; Gilbert R Upchurch; Irving L Kron; John A Kern; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  The continuing challenges of translational research: clinician-scientists' perspective.

Authors:  Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; Janice Tsui
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  National Institutes of Health Funding for Abdominal Organ Transplantation Research Has Declined: A 30-year Analysis.

Authors:  Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Adishesh K Narahari; J Hunter Mehaffey; Dylan L Schaff; Irving L Kron; Kenneth L Brayman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.385

2.  Longitudinal analysis of National Institutes of Health funding for academic thoracic surgeons.

Authors:  Adishesh K Narahari; J Hunter Mehaffey; Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Robert B Hawkins; Eric J Charles; Mark E Roeser; Christine Lau; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.