| Literature DB >> 32767970 |
Jin Sun Kim1, Young Mu Kim1, Ha Jung Kim2, Jae Moon Choi2, Yong Beom Kim3, Jae Seok Song4, Hong Seuk Yang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperthermia is relatively rare during general anesthesia; however, a few studies have been conducted on hyperthermia and the neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by rocuronium, and the reversal of NMB by sugammadex. We investigated the effect of hyperthermia status on the NMB induced by rocuronium, and its reversal by sugammadex, in isolated phrenic nerve hemidiaphragm (PNHD) preparations of the rat.Entities:
Keywords: Antagonist; Hyperthermia; Neuromuscular blockade; Rocuronium; Sugammadex
Year: 2020 PMID: 32767970 PMCID: PMC7412831 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01114-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
The mean size and weight of the phrenic nerve-diaphragm tissue
| Group | Rat body weight(g) | Hemi-diaphragm mass (mg) | Hemi-diaphragm length (mm) | Hemi-diaphragm width (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36 °C( | 245.7 (65.3) | 168.8 (49.3) | 10.2 (1.3) | 19.3 (2.7) |
| 38 °C(n = 11) | 256.8 (34.2) | 163.9 (29.6) | 9.6 (0.9) | 20.1 (3.4) |
| 40 °C(n = 11) | 238 (18.9) | 152 (25.3) | 8.8 (1.1) | 17.2 (2.1) |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD
Fig. 1Cumulative concentration-response curves of rocuronium in the three groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. T1 height (%) exhibited a significant decline in the 450 μg- 750 μgphase of administration; especially the 36 °C and 40 °C groups showed clear differences in all areas (P = 0.019). aP < 0.05 vs. 36 °C (Bonferroni corrected); b P < 0.05 vs. 38 °C (Bonferroni corrected)
Comparisons of effective concentration of rocuronium
| 36 °C | 38 °C | 40 °C | 36 vs. 38 | 38 vs. 40 | 36 vs 40 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC5(μg/ | 5.3 (1.3)a | 4.2 (1.2) | 3.1 (1.0)c | 0.0014 | 0.048 | 0.066 | 0.0006 |
| EC10 | 5.8 (1.2) | 4.8 (1.2) | 3.7 (1.0)c | 0.0014 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.0006 |
| EC25 | 6.5 (1.1) | 5.6 (1.1)b | 4.5 (0.9)c | 0.0015 | 0.087 | 0.041 | 0.0006 |
| EC50 | 7.2 (1.0) | 6.4 (1.1)b | 5.3 (0.8)c | 0.0014 | 0.115 | 0.035 | 0.0005 |
| EC75 | 7.9 (0.9) | 7.2 (1.0)b | 6.2 (0.8)c | 0.0014 | 0.167 | 0.035 | 0.0004 |
| EC90 | 8.6 (0.9) | 8.0 (1.0)b | 7.0 (0.7)c | 0.0011 | 0.131 | 0.035 | 0.0003 |
| EC95 | 9.1 (0.8) | 8.5 (1.0)b | 7.6 (0.6)c | 0.0015 | 0.167 | 0.048 | 0.0003 |
Values presented as mean (SD). EC, effective concentration
aP value less than 36 °C vs. 38 °C
bP value less than 38 °C vs. 40 °C
CP value less than 36 °C vs. 40 °C
Fig. 2Changes in the T1 height (%) duration during the 30 min recovery period significantly differed between the groups. The group at 36 °C showed increased recovery than did the groups at 38 °C and 40 °C(P = 0.011, P < 0.001 respectively)
Fig. 3TOFR 0.9 of control exhibited no difference among the groups after administration of equimolar doses of sugammadex
Twitch height and train-of-four ratio after the addition of sugammadex
| 36 °C | 38 °C | 40 °C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum T1 height | 16.1 (3.7) | 16.5 (4.1) | 13.1 (2.6) |
| Dur 25 (%) min | 2.1 (0.8) | 2.7 (0.8) | 5.0 (1.7) |
| Dur 25 ~ 75 (%) min | 3.7 (1.3) | 4.7 (0.8) | 5.1 (1.0) |
| TOFR (%) in 30 min | 97.8 (3.6) | 94.1 (6.0) | 94.9 (5.8) |
| Maximal TOF ratio < 0.9(n) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Values are expressed as mean ± (SD) or number, TOF: train-of-four, T1 height of train-of-four, Dur 25%: time from reversal to recovery of T1 to 25%, Dur 25 to 75%: time to recovery of T1 from 25 to 75%