Literature DB >> 32767740

The Impact of Shared Decision-Making in Perinatal Care: A Scoping Review.

Michele Megregian1, Cathy Emeis1, Marianne Nieuwenhuijze2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making is considered to be a key aspect of woman-centered care and a strategy to improve communication, respect, and satisfaction. This scoping review identified studies that used a shared decision-making support strategy as the primary intervention in the context of perinatal care.
METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS databases was completed for English-language studies conducted from January 2000 through November 2019 that examined the impact of a shared decision-making support strategy on a perinatal decision (such as choice of mode of birth after prior cesarean birth). Studies that only examined the use of a decision aid were excluded. Nine studies met inclusion criteria and were examined for the nature of the shared decision-making intervention as well as outcome measures such as decisional evaluation, including decisional conflict, decisional regret, and certainty.
RESULTS: The 9 included studies were heterogeneous with regard to shared decision-making interventions and measured outcomes and were performed in different countries and in a variety of perinatal situations, such as women facing the choice of mode of birth after prior cesarean birth. The impact of a shared decision-making intervention on women's perception of shared decision-making and on their experiences of the decision-making process were mixed. There may be a decrease in decisional conflict and regret related to feeling informed, but no change in decisional certainty. DISCUSSION: Despite the call to increase the use of shared decision-making in perinatal care, there are few studies that have examined the effects of a shared decision-making support strategy. Further studies that include antepartum and intrapartum settings, which include common perinatal decisions such as induction of labor, are needed. In addition, clear guidance and strategies for successfully integrating shared decision-making and practice recommendations would help women and health care providers navigate these complex decisions.
© 2020 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision support techniques; patient-centered communication; pregnancy; shared decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32767740     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  6 in total

1.  Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Perinatal Outcomes of Placental Abruption-Detailed Annual Data and Clinical Perspectives from Polish Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Monika Bączkowska; Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska; Magdalena Zgliczyńska; Robert Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha; Beata Rebizant; Michał Ciebiera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Induction of labor or expectant management? Birth outcomes for nulliparous individuals choosing midwifery care.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Joanne M Bailey; Shanti D Colo; Nicole S Carlson; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.081

Review 3.  How is patient-centred care conceptualized in obstetrical health? comparison of themes from concept analyses in obstetrical health- and patient-centred care.

Authors:  Kelly Dong; Bismah Jameel; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  Impact of COVID-19 on perinatal care: Perceptions of family physicians in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica Taylor Goldstein; Aimee R Eden; Melina K Taylor; Andrea Dotson; Tyler Barreto
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.081

5.  Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care.

Authors:  Anja Alexandra Schulz; Markus Antonius Wirtz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  A case study on the use of Public Narrative as a leadership development approach for Patient Leaders in the English National Health Service.

Authors:  Emilia Aiello; Kathryn Perera; Mo Ade; Teresa Sordé-Martí
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.