Luigi Losco1,2, Dicle Aksoyler1, Shih-Heng Chen3, Alberto Bolletta1, Jonathan Velazquez-Mujica1, Giuseppe Di Taranto4, Federico Lo Torto4, Marco Marcasciano5, Emanuele Cigna2, Hung-Chi Chen1. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 5. Unità di Oncologia Chirurgica Ricostruttiva della Mammella, "Spedali Riuniti" di Livorno, Breast Unit Integrata di Livorno Cecina, Piombino Elba, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Leghorn, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A diversion loop provides an alternative pathway for food intake from the bucco-gingival sulcus into the thoracic esophagus. Therefore, the bolus does not pass via pharynx where choking may occur in case of severe dysphagia. The data about outcomes and complications of the diversionary procedure are short and they refer to small cohort with brief follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data of 48 patients, mean aged 34.3 years (range, 22-58 years), undergoing the creation of a diversion loop in two stages. Patients complained of aspiration, choking, and dysphagia. Swallowing disorders were caused by corrosive injury, radiation damage, or neurologic injury, and were investigated through laryngoscopy and esophagography. A diversion loop was created in 45 cases with free jejunal flap and in 3 cases with radial forearm flap. Complications, functional outcomes, and revision rate were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 26.3 months. RESULTS: We reported one failure (2%) and one partial necrosis of the free flaps. The most frequent complication was hematoma (8%). One case of esophagocutaneous fistula (2%) and two cases of stricture (4%) were also observed. Forty-two patients (87%) took all of the daily diet from their mouths through the diversionary conduit. A poor functional outcome was significantly associated with pre-operative radiotherapy (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The diversion loop offers an alternative route for alimentation. Patients are freed from their choking obsession; moreover, they are rehabilitated into society without the drawbacks of permanent jejunostomy feeding. The technique was upgraded with caudal marginal mandibulectomy to improve the outcomes. Patients undergoing a diversionary procedure due to radiation damage should be carefully informed about the expected functional results.
BACKGROUND: A diversion loop provides an alternative pathway for food intake from the bucco-gingival sulcus into the thoracic esophagus. Therefore, the bolus does not pass via pharynx where choking may occur in case of severe dysphagia. The data about outcomes and complications of the diversionary procedure are short and they refer to small cohort with brief follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data of 48 patients, mean aged 34.3 years (range, 22-58 years), undergoing the creation of a diversion loop in two stages. Patients complained of aspiration, choking, and dysphagia. Swallowing disorders were caused by corrosive injury, radiation damage, or neurologic injury, and were investigated through laryngoscopy and esophagography. A diversion loop was created in 45 cases with free jejunal flap and in 3 cases with radial forearm flap. Complications, functional outcomes, and revision rate were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 26.3 months. RESULTS: We reported one failure (2%) and one partial necrosis of the free flaps. The most frequent complication was hematoma (8%). One case of esophagocutaneous fistula (2%) and two cases of stricture (4%) were also observed. Forty-two patients (87%) took all of the daily diet from their mouths through the diversionary conduit. A poor functional outcome was significantly associated with pre-operative radiotherapy (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The diversion loop offers an alternative route for alimentation. Patients are freed from their choking obsession; moreover, they are rehabilitated into society without the drawbacks of permanent jejunostomy feeding. The technique was upgraded with caudal marginal mandibulectomy to improve the outcomes. Patients undergoing a diversionary procedure due to radiation damage should be carefully informed about the expected functional results.