| Literature DB >> 32767286 |
Tina Kienitz1, Stefanie Hahner2, Stephanie Burger-Stritt2, Marcus Quinkler1.
Abstract
Adrenal insufficiency (AI) requires life-long treatment with glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Over- or under-substitution carries the risk of increased morbidity in the form of side effects or adrenal crises. Glucocorticoid replacement therapy needs to be flexible with dose adaptation in special situations. This could not be managed by medical personnel on a daily basis, but requires an educated patient who has a good knowledge of the disease, understands his medical therapy and is able to perform situational dose adaptation. The rarity of the disease in combination with the need to respond to stressful situations with rapid glucocorticoid dose adjustment underlines that a well-trained patient is crucial for optimal management of the disease.In this literature review we provide background information further clarifying the need of education in patients with AI including the current shortcomings of medical therapy and of the treatment of patients with AI. We outline the aims of therapeutic patient education, present the concept of structured patient education in Germany, and discuss available results of patient group education programs. Furthermore, we propose strategies how therapeutic patient education for adrenal insufficiency can be organized under COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Thieme. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32767286 PMCID: PMC8043669 DOI: 10.1055/a-1217-7208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ISSN: 0947-7349 Impact factor: 2.949
Fig. 1Endocrine centers in Germany and neighboring countries who were instructed with the structured patient education program of the section “Nebenniere, Steroide und Hypertonie” of the German Endocrine Society (DGE) by end of 2018, and who offer a standardized patient education program on a regular (black) or an irregular (light grey) basis (with friendly permission of Smadar Pahl, Oldenburg, Germany).
Fig. 2Patients’ self-assessment of the information status on AI (n=44) before, after, and 6-9 months after standardised patient education. The scale ranges from “very good” to “very bad”. Chi-Square test was performed to compare rating “very well”+”well” versus rating “satisfactory”+”badly”+”very badly”.
Fig. 3Percentage of patients with secondary AI (n=44) who would dare to perform a self-injection before, directly after, and 6-9 months after patient education. Chi-Square test was performed to compare percentage of self-injection.