Jian Ye1, Karen Myung2, Senthil Packiasabapathy1, Jeffrey S Yu3, Joseph E Jacobson2, Stephanie C Whittaker1, Peter Castelluccio4, Meghan Drayton Jackson5, Senthilkumar Sadhasivam1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Indianapolis, IN. 3. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Ind.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is extremely painful, with no superior single analgesic modality. We introduced a methadone-based multimodal analgesia protocol, aiming to decrease the length of hospital stay (LOS), improve pain control, and decrease the need for additional opioids. METHODS: We analyzed 122 idiopathic scoliosis patients with posterior instrumented spinal fusion. They were matched by age, sex, surgeon, and the number of levels fused before and after the implementation of the new protocol. This analysis included 61 controls (intrathecal morphine, gabapentin, intravenous opioids, and adjuncts) and 61 patients on the new protocol (scheduled methadone, methocarbamol, ketorolac/ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and oxycodone with intravenous opioids as needed). The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, total opioid use (morphine milligram equivalents), time to a first bowel movement, and postdischarge phone calls. RESULTS: New protocol patients were discharged earlier (median LOS, 2 days) compared with control patients (3 days; P < 0.001). Total inpatient morphine consumption was lower in the protocol group (P < 0.001). Pain scores were higher in the protocol group on the day of surgery, similar on postoperative day (POD) 1, and lower by POD 2 (P = 0.01). The new protocol also reduced the median time to first bowel movement (P < 0.001), and the number of postdischarge pain-related phone calls (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Methadone-based multimodal analgesia resulted in significantly lower LOS compared with the conventional regimen. It also provided improved pain control, reduced total opioid consumption, and early bowel movement compared with the control group.
INTRODUCTION: Posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is extremely painful, with no superior single analgesic modality. We introduced a methadone-based multimodal analgesia protocol, aiming to decrease the length of hospital stay (LOS), improve pain control, and decrease the need for additional opioids. METHODS: We analyzed 122 idiopathic scoliosis patients with posterior instrumented spinal fusion. They were matched by age, sex, surgeon, and the number of levels fused before and after the implementation of the new protocol. This analysis included 61 controls (intrathecal morphine, gabapentin, intravenous opioids, and adjuncts) and 61 patients on the new protocol (scheduled methadone, methocarbamol, ketorolac/ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and oxycodone with intravenous opioids as needed). The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, total opioid use (morphine milligram equivalents), time to a first bowel movement, and postdischarge phone calls. RESULTS: New protocol patients were discharged earlier (median LOS, 2 days) compared with control patients (3 days; P < 0.001). Total inpatient morphine consumption was lower in the protocol group (P < 0.001). Pain scores were higher in the protocol group on the day of surgery, similar on postoperative day (POD) 1, and lower by POD 2 (P = 0.01). The new protocol also reduced the median time to first bowel movement (P < 0.001), and the number of postdischarge pain-related phone calls (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Methadone-based multimodal analgesia resulted in significantly lower LOS compared with the conventional regimen. It also provided improved pain control, reduced total opioid consumption, and early bowel movement compared with the control group.
Authors: Glenn S Murphy; Joseph W Szokol; Michael J Avram; Steven B Greenberg; Torin D Shear; Mark A Deshur; Jeffery S Vender; Jessica Benson; Rebecca L Newmark Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Neil R Singhal; John Jones; Janet Semenova; Amber Williamson; Katelyn McCollum; Dennis Tong; Jonathan Jerman; David M Notrica; Hayden Nguyen Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Vidya Chidambaran; Xue Zhang; Lisa J Martin; Lili Ding; Matthew T Weirauch; Kristie Geisler; Bobbie L Stubbeman; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Hong Ji Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med Date: 2017-05-09
Authors: Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Blessed W Aruldhas; Senthil Packiasabapathy; Brian R Overholser; Pengyue Zhang; Yong Zang; Janelle S Renschler; Ryan E Fitzgerald; Sara K Quinney Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 6.627
Authors: Blessed W Aruldhas; Sara K Quinney; Brian R Overholser; Michael A Heathman; Andrea R Masters; Reynold C Ly; Hongyu Gao; Senthil Packiasabapathy; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2021-08-26
Authors: Senthil Packiasabapathy; Blessed W Aruldhas; Pengyue Zhang; Brian R Overholser; Sara K Quinney; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 2.533