| Literature DB >> 32766199 |
Jitendra Kumar Singh1, Dilaram Acharya2,3, Rajan Paudel4, Salila Gautam5, Mandira Adhikari6, Shambhu Prasad Kushwaha7, Ji-Hyuk Park2, Seok-Ju Yoo2, Kwan Lee2.
Abstract
Introduction: Public health interventions such as text messaging are commonly evaluated in high-income countries and that the evaluation reports of the effectiveness of community health volunteers in low-income countries like Nepal is scarce. This study aimed to determine whether female community health volunteer (FCHV) capacity building and text messaging to expectant mother increases gestational weights and hemoglobin levels of pregnant women living in southern Nepal.Entities:
Keywords: capacity building; community health volunteers; gestational weight gain; hemoglobin changes; text messaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 32766199 PMCID: PMC7379845 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Study CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 2Schematic of the intervention study design.
Personal characteristics of the intervention and control groups.
| ≤19 years | 94 (22.8) | 43 (20.1) | 51 (25.6) | |
| 20–34 years | 285 (69.0) | 147 (68.7) | 138 (69.3) | |
| ≥35 years | 34 (8.2) | 24 (11.2) | 10 (5.0) | |
| Dalit | 68 (16.5) | 35 (16.4) | 33 (16.6) | |
| Aadibasi/Janajati | 91 (22.0) | 43 (20.1) | 48 (24.1) | |
| Upper caste group | 254 (61.5) | 136 (63.5) | 118 (59.3) | |
| Hindu | 379 (91.8) | 198 (92.5) | 181 (91.0) | |
| Muslim | 25 (6.1) | 11 (5.1) | 14 (7.0) | |
| Buddhist/Christian | 9 (2.2) | 5 (2.4) | 4 (2.0) | |
| No education | 104 (25.2) | 50 (23.4) | 54 (27.1) | |
| Primary | 148 (35.8) | 83 (38.8) | 65 (32.7) | |
| Secondary | 78 (18.9) | 45 (21.0) | 33 (16.6) | |
| Higher | 83 (20.1) | 36 (16.8) | 47 (23.6) | |
| No work/household works | 112 (27.1) | 60 (28.0) | 52 (26.1) | |
| Agriculture/farming | 130 (31.5) | 70 (32.7) | 60 (30.2) | |
| Service/salaried | 33 (8.0) | 15 (7.0) | 18 (9.0) | |
| Sales/business | 59 (14.3) | 22 (10.3) | 37 (18.6) | |
| Manual/waged labor | 79 (19.1) | 47 (22.0) | 32 (16.1) | |
| 1st quintile | 121 (29.3) | 70 (32.7) | 51 (25.6) | |
| 2nd quintile | 99 (24.0) | 48 (22.4) | 51 (25.6) | |
| 3rd quintile | 79 (19.1) | 37 (17.3) | 42 (21.1) | |
| 4th quintile | 59 (14.3) | 27 (12.6) | 32 (16.1) | |
| 5th quintile | 55 (13.3) | 32 (15.0) | 23 (11.6) | |
| Primiparous | 161 (39.0) | 70 (32.7) | 91 (45.7) | |
| Multiparous | 252 (61.0) | 144 (67.3) | 108 (54.3) | |
Relatively disadvantaged;
relatively advantaged.
Body weights and hemoglobin levels of members of the intervention and control groups at baseline and after intervention.
| Weight (kg) | 45.80 (5.72) | 45.93 (5.90) | 45.66 (5.52) | |
| Hemoglobin level (g/dl) | 11.12 (1.07) | 11.20 (1.08) | 11.0 (1.15) | |
| Weight (kg) | 51.68 (6.13) | 52.36 (6.28) | 50.94 (5.90) | |
| Hemoglobin level (g/dl) | 11.28 (1.01) | 11.43 (1.00) | 11.11(1.10) | |
SD, standard deviation; kg, Kilogram; g/dl, gram/decilitre; n, numbers; baseline hemoglobin level (gm/dl), intervention hemoglobin level (gm/dl).
Gestational weight gains in the intervention and control groups.
| Total weight gain, kg (95% CI) | 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) | 5.2 (5.0, 5.5) | <0.0001 |
| Mean difference, kg (95% CI) | 1.2 (1.0, 1.6) | Reference | |
| Rates of weight gain, kg/week (95% CI) | 0.42 (0.32, 0.47) | 0.32 (0.31,0.43) | <0.0001 |
| Total weight gain, kg (95% CI) | 6.9 (6.2, 7.7) | 5.8 (5.2, 5.9) | <0.0001 |
| Mean difference, kg (95% CI) | 1.1 (1.0, 1.9) | Reference | |
| Rates of weight gain, kg/week (95% CI) | 0.50 (0.37, 0.52) | 0.39 (0.36, 0.46) | <0.0001 |
CI, confidence interval; Kg, kilogram;
n represents the number of participants/measurements; COR, crude odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio
adjusted for age, caste/ethnicity, religion, education, occupation, wealth quintile, and parity.
Changes in serum hemoglobin levels in intervention and control groups.
| Total Hb change, gm/dl (95% CI) | 0.23 (0.17,0.29) | 0.11 (0.2, 0.18) | 0.016 |
| Mean difference, gm/dl (95% CI) | 0.12 (0.08, 0.21) | Reference | |
| Rates of Hb change, gm/dl/week (95% CI) | 0.015 (0.011, 0.07) | 0.006 (0.003, 0.009) | <0.0001 |
| Total Hb change, gm/dl (95% CI) | 0.21 (0.13,0.22) | 0.10 (0.07, 0.13) | <0.0001 |
| Mean difference, gm/dl (95% CI) | 0.11 (0.09, 0.15) | Reference | |
| Rates of Hb change, gm/dl/week (95% CI) | 0.02 (0.01, 0.09) | 0.004 (0.002, 0.12) | <0.0001 |
CI, Confidence interval; Hb, hemoglobin; gm, gram;
n represents the number of participants/measurements; COR, crude odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio
adjusted for age, caste/ethnicity, religion, education, occupation, wealth quintile, and parity.
Changes in weight and serum hemoglobin levels in intervention and control group at baseline and after intervention by caste/ethnicity.
| Upper caste group | At baseline | Intervention | 136 | 45.85 (5.30) | 0.218 | 82 | 11.25 (1.01) | 0.288 |
| Control | 118 | 46.65 (5.06) | 63 | 11.07 (1.08) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 136 | 52.13 (5.56) | 0.821 | 70 | 11.50 (0.99) | 0.023 | |
| Control | 118 | 51.97 (5.57) | 54 | 11.09 (0.93) | ||||
| Aadibasi/Janajati | At baseline | Intervention | 43 | 46.98 (7.96) | 0.104 | 26 | 11.08 (0.90) | 0.605 |
| Control | 48 | 44.60 (5.74) | 26 | 11.22 (1.16) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 43 | 53.72 (8.06) | 0.018 | 21 | 11.22 (0.93) | 0.586 | |
| Control | 48 | 50.17 (5.97) | 22 | 11.37 (0.94) | ||||
| Dalit | At baseline | Intervention | 35 | 45.00 (5.09) | 0.320 | 25 | 11.12 (1.15) | 0.412 |
| Control | 33 | 43.64 (6.11) | 26 | 10.81 (1.29) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 35 | 51.63 (6.39) | 0.038 | 21 | 11.42 (1.14) | 0.184 | |
| Control | 33 | 48.39 (6.16) | 24 | 10.92 (1.19) | ||||
N, number; SD, standard deviation; kg, Kilogram; g/dl, gram/decilitre.
Changes in weight and serum hemoglobin levels in intervention and control group at baseline and after intervention by educational status.
| No education | At baseline | Intervention | 50 | 45.46 (6.07) | 0.528 | 31 | 11.21 (1.11) | 0.222 |
| Control | 54 | 44.65 (6.93) | 33 | 10.85 (1.25) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 50 | 52.68 (6.60) | 0.020 | 23 | 11.44 (1.24) | 0.179 | |
| Control | 54 | 49.46 (7.18) | 31 | 10.99 (1.17) | ||||
| Primary | At baseline | Intervention | 83 | 46.84 (6.60) | 0.124 | 54 | 11.20 (1.03) | 0.691 |
| Control | 65 | 45.37 (4.44) | 31 | 11.10 (1.15) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 83 | 52.78 (6.85) | 0.043 | 49 | 11.42 (0.97) | 0.257 | |
| Control | 65 | 50.74 (4.81) | 25 | 11.15 (0.92) | ||||
| Secondary | At baseline | Intervention | 45 | 45.13 (5.69) | 0.609 | 25 | 10.82 (0.81) | 0.429 |
| Control | 33 | 45.70 (3.99) | 16 | 11.05 (1.06) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 45 | 50.60 (6.18) | 0.760 | 20 | 10.96 (0.64) | 0.294 | |
| Control | 33 | 50.97 (4.46) | 13 | 11.21 (0.70) | ||||
| Higher | At baseline | Intervention | 36 | 45.50 (3.78) | 0.134 | 23 | 11.57 (0.87) | 0.160 |
| Control | 47 | 47.19 (5.81) | 35 | 11.18 (1.09) | ||||
| After intervention | Intervention | 36 | 53.17 (3.97) | 0.818 | 20 | 11.89 (0.90) | 0.012 | |
| Control | 47 | 52.89 (6.16) | 31 | 11.16 (1.02) | ||||
SD, standard deviation; kg, Kilogram; g/dl, gram/decilitre.