| Literature DB >> 32765807 |
Diego Fernando Batista1, Bertha Furlan Polegato1, Renata Candido da Silva1, Renan Turini Claro1, Paula Shmidt Azevedo1, Ana Angélica Fernandes2, Katashi Okoshi1, Sergio Alberto Rupp de Paiva1, Marcos Ferreira Minicucci1, Leonardo Antônio Mamede Zornorff1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of different modalities and intensities of exercise training on cardiac remodeling started early after experimental myocardial infarction (MI). Male Wistar rats, weighing 200-250 g, were subjected to experimental MI. After 5 days, the animals were allocated into three experimental groups and observed for three months: S (sedentary control animals), C (animals subjected to continuous low-intensity training), and HIT (animals subjected to high-intensity interval training). Low-intensity exercise training was performed at a treadmill speed corresponding to 40% VO2 max, which was kept unchanged throughout the entire session (i.e., continuous low-intensity training). High-intensity interval training was performed in such a way that rats run during 3 min at 60% VO2 max, followed by 4-minute intervals at 85% VO2 max (i.e., high-intensity interval training). After the follow-up period, we studied hypertrophy and ventricular geometry, functional alterations in vivo and in vitro, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and cardiac energetic metabolism. Our data showed that both high-intensity interval and continuous low-intensity modalities improved cardiac energetic metabolism variables in comparison with sedentary infarcted animals. In addition, high-intensity interval training decreased cardiac oxidative stress, associated with improved diastolic function. On the other hand, the continuous low-intensity group showed impairment of cardiac function. Therefore, altogether, our data suggest that high-intensity interval training could be the best modality for early physical exercise after MI and should be better studied in this clinical scenario.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32765807 PMCID: PMC7387991 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5041791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Experimental timeline. MI: myocardial infarction; echo: echocardiogram; VO2 max: maximum oxygen uptake; BA: biochemical analysis.
Echocardiographic data.
| Variables | S ( | C ( | HHIT ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVDD (mm) | 10.4 ± 0.9 | 10.6 ± 1.1 | 10.3 ± 1.2 |
| LVSD (mm) | 7.85 ± 1.0 | 8.21 ± 1.4 | 8.53 ± 0.2 |
| EF (%) | 0.57 ± 0.1 | 0.53 ± 0.1 | 0.50 ± 0.1 |
| FAC (%) | 36.5 ± 11.1 | 30.7 ± 13.4 | 33.9 ± 14.5 |
| Tei index | 0.56 (0.47-0.65) | 0.69 (0.59-0.84)∗ | 0.60 (0.55-0.66) |
| LVWT (mm/s) | 29.7 ± 5.7 | 19.3.±6.7 | 27.9 ± 7.4 |
| EDT | 43.3 ± 7.6 | 47.4 ± 8.7 | 37.3 ± 10.8# |
| IRT/RR0.5 | 57.3 ± 8.8# | 66.2 ± 9.1 | 57.2 ± 14.3# |
|
| 3.10 ± 0.48 | 2.79 ± 0.35 | 3.09 ± 0.56 |
|
| 3.29 ± 1.19 | 3.46 ± 0.86 | 4.69 ± 1.15∗# |
S: sedentary control animals; C: continuous moderate intensity training; HIT: high-intensity interval training; LVDD: left ventricular diastolic diameter; LVSD: left ventricular systolic diameter; LVWT: posterior wall shortening velocity; FAC: fractional area change; IRT/RR0.5: isovolumetric relaxation time normalized to the heart rate. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or medians (including the lower quartile and upper quartile). ∗P < 0.05 versus S; #P < 0.05 versus C.
Isolated heart data.
| Variables | S ( | C ( | HIT ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| +dP/dt (mmHg/s) | 1825 ± 496 | 1541 ± 557 | 1750 ± 337 |
| –dP/dt (mmHg/s) | 1375 ± 423 | 1208 ± 437 | 1200 ± 357 |
| SP (mmHg) | 100 ± 23.5 | 80 ± 12.1 | 93 ± 14.1 |
S: sedentary control animals; C: continuous moderate intensity training; HIT: high-intensity interval training; +dP/dt: maximum LV pressure development rate; –dP/dt: maximum LV pressure decrease rate; SP: systolic pressure. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. P > 0.05.
Cardiac oxidative stress enzyme activity.
| Variables | S ( | C ( | HIT ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| LH (nmol/mg of tissue) | 251 ± 30.9 | 249 ± 55.7 | 186 ± 39.9∗# |
| CAT ( | 80.4 ± 11.5 | 86.5 ± 9.7 | 119 ± 15.7∗# |
| GSH-Px (nmol/mg) | 22.5 ± 4.9 | 33.1 ± 2.9∗ | 41.1 ± 7.7∗# |
S: sedentary control animals; C: continuous moderate intensity training; HIT: high-intensity interval training; LH: lipid hydroperoxide; CAT: catalase; GSH-Px: glutathione peroxidase. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05 versus S; #P < 0.05 versus C.
Cardiac energy metabolism.
| Variables | S ( | C ( | HIT ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (nmol/g) | 198 ± 39.5 | 165 ± 20.1 | 217 ± 35.4# |
| Lactate dehydrogenase (nmol/g) | 101 ± 9.4 | 89.6 ± 9.5∗ | 80.4 ± 8.0∗ |
|
| 18.1 ± 4.1 | 19.5 ± 4.6 | 24.2 ± 4.8∗# |
| Citrate synthase (nmol/g) | 27.0 ± 7.0 | 35.4 ± 9.0 | 74.7 ± 9.9∗# |
| Complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) (nmol/mg) | 3.2 (1.8-4.1) | 5.1 (4.3-6.4)∗ | 5.1 (3.9-6.0)∗ |
| ATP synthase (nmol/mg) | 33.5 ± 7.2 | 60.1 ± 8.1∗ | 61.8 ± 6.8∗ |
S: sedentary control animals; C: continuous moderate intensity training; HIT: high-intensity interval training. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or medians (including the lower quartile and upper quartile). ∗P < 0.05 versus S; #P < 0.05 versus C.